[NTG-context] Re: metafun not working

2005-06-29 Thread Mojca Miklavec
luigi.scarso wrote: hmm, try on ctan: ctan/support/pstoedit/windows It should be an older (3.31) but good version . cited from the webpage: New or changed in 3.32: ... workaround to cope with a change introduced since ghostscript 7.04. Some new operators were added to ghostscript's

Re: [NTG-context] Re: metafun not working

2005-06-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Mojca Miklavec wrote: I tried it out before reading that paragraph and I can approve: unless you have an ancient GS, it doesn't work at all. 3.40 at least does something even though it crashes. but i have no problems here with gs 8.51 (all 8 versions worked ok) and pstoedit 3.33, so how

[NTG-context] Re: metafun not working

2005-06-29 Thread Mojca Miklavec
luigi.scarso wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote: I tried it out before reading that paragraph and I can approve: unless you have an ancient GS, it doesn't work at all. 3.40 at least does something even though it crashes. but i have no problems here with gs 8.51 (all 8

Re: [NTG-context] Re: metafun not working

2005-06-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Mojca Miklavec wrote: I believe that the version 3.33 works, but I can't find it anywhere. i mailed you a copy yesterday (1 meg attachment) but you rmail agent may be to picky on zip files Hans -

Re: [NTG-context] Re: metafun manual

2004-08-31 Thread Hans Hagen
Jojo wrote: Would you plan to release a Chinese version? I am glad to be a volunteer translate for that. could be a challenge, remind me later (once the source code of the manual is stable translation should be no problem) Hans

[NTG-context] Re: metafun manual

2004-08-31 Thread Jojo
+++ Hans Hagen [31/08/04 10:25 +0200]: Jojo wrote: Would you plan to release a Chinese version? I am glad to be a volunteer translate for that. could be a challenge, remind me later (once the source code of the manual is stable translation should be no problem) Best wishes!

[NTG-context] Re: metafun manual

2004-08-30 Thread Jojo
+++ Brooks Moses [30/08/04 12:37 -0700]: On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Floris van Manen wrote: I'm going to 'finish' the metafun manual, so if you have topics that need to be covered ... That's Great !! If you'd like volunteers to proofread the finished version, I'd be glad

[NTG-context] Re: metafun

2004-06-23 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, try texexec --alone --make metafun and your texexec is (as far as I can judge) far out of date. TeXExec 4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004 is current Patrick -- texshow-web: http://members.ping.de:8061 ConTeXt wiki: http://members.ping.de:8062

Re: [NTG-context] Re: metafun

2004-06-23 Thread jimarin
you are right...mine is 3.1 but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from pragma-ade downloading page... is it not the right place/version? where should I get the lattest? thanks again ! Jose Hi, try texexec --alone --make metafun and your texexec is (as far as I

[NTG-context] Re: metafun

2004-06-23 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from pragma-ade downloading page... is it not the right place/version? that is the only authorative(spelling?) place to download... There are mirrors, but I don't know how uptodate they are. The output you have sent me

Re: [NTG-context] Re: metafun

2004-06-23 Thread jimarin
yep, it seems to work...it generates metafun.mem in the same directory it was invoked... do I have to invoke texexec --make --alone in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ? I have not seen anything like that mentioned in install document... is lattest version of

[NTG-context] Re: metafun

2004-06-23 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi Jose, do I have to invoke texexec --make --alone in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ? texexec --make --alone bypasses your distribution's way of installing format files (fmtutil in your case I guess). Put the resulting format files (*.fmt, *efmt, *mem) in

Re: [NTG-context] Re: metafun

2004-06-23 Thread Hans Hagen
Patrick Gundlach wrote: Hi, but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from pragma-ade downloading page... is it not the right place/version? that is the only authorative(spelling?) place to download... There are mirrors, but I don't know how uptodate they are. The output

Re: [NTG-context] Re: metafun

2004-06-23 Thread Hans Hagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yep, it seems to work...it generates metafun.mem in the same directory it was invoked... do I have to invoke texexec --make --alone in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ? I have not seen anything like that mentioned in install document...