Gerben Wierda schrieb am 05.04.2020 um 12:27:
On 5 Apr 2020, at 11:34, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/5/2020 12:29 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
I have a series of startMPpage—stopMPpage pairs (with MP code inbetween). These
now become separate pages in a single PDF. But I need them to become separate
> On 5 Apr 2020, at 12:27, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
> Alternatively, I could have a step before this to turn the input XML into
> many separate XMLs and have many ConTeXt runs. Probably that is the best way
> to do it. Each generated XML would have all of the original XML except it
> would onl
> On 5 Apr 2020, at 11:34, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> On 4/5/2020 12:29 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>> I have a series of startMPpage—stopMPpage pairs (with MP code inbetween).
>> These now become separate pages in a single PDF. But I need them to become
>> separate PDF’s each during my ConTeXt run,
On 4/5/2020 12:29 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
I have a series of startMPpage—stopMPpage pairs (with MP code inbetween). These
now become separate pages in a single PDF. But I need them to become separate
PDF’s each during my ConTeXt run, with a name of my own choosing. Is this
possible? I guess t
I have a series of startMPpage—stopMPpage pairs (with MP code inbetween). These
now become separate pages in a single PDF. But I need them to become separate
PDF’s each during my ConTeXt run, with a name of my own choosing. Is this
possible? I guess this will be problematic, but one can hope (ma
