Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2010-07-05 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Sunday 07 June 2009 16:55:59 Hans Hagen wrote: > Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > Alan BRASLAU wrote: > >> On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote: > >>> Alan BRASLAU wrote: > On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: > > Peter Münster wrote: > >> Should this work, or shou

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-09 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: > > Should there be a difference (perhaps "THIN SPACE" breakable)? > > Yes, U+2009 is supposed to be breakable. Ok, but not the case in ConTeXt: \starttext \hsize1pt bla bla \stoptext Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/con

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-09 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> Should there be a difference (perhaps "THIN SPACE" breakable)? Yes, U+2009 is supposed to be breakable. Arthur ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! mail

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-08 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Hans Hagen wrote: > Peter Münster wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not: > > > > \starttext > > X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank > > X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank > > X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank > > \stoptex

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
Taco Hoekwater wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use "~" and "\," as in the past? repaired in next beta (was unwanted s

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use "~" and "\," as in the past? repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimizat

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote: > Alan BRASLAU wrote: > > On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: > >> Peter Münster wrote: > >>> Should this work, or should we rather use "~" and "\," as in the past? > >> > >> repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimizat

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use "~" and "\," as in the past? repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization) "~", by the way, appears not to be respected in math mode; exampl

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: > Peter Münster wrote: > > Should this work, or should we rather use "~" and "\," as in the past? > > repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization) "~", by the way, appears not to be respected in math mode; example: \starttext $

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: Hello, This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not: \starttext X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank \stoptext Should this work, or should we rather use "~" and "\," as in the past?

[NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-05 Thread Peter Münster
Hello, This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not: \starttext X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank \stoptext Should this work, or should we rather use "~" and "\," as in the past? Cheers, Peter -- Cont