On Sunday 07 June 2009 16:55:59 Hans Hagen wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \,
Should there be a difference (perhaps THIN SPACE breakable)?
Yes, U+2009 is supposed to be breakable.
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Should there be a difference (perhaps THIN SPACE breakable)?
Yes, U+2009 is supposed to be breakable.
Ok, but not the case in ConTeXt:
\starttext
\hsize1pt
bla bla
\stoptext
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello,
This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not:
\starttext
X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank
X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank
X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank
\stoptext
Should this
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello,
This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not:
\starttext
X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank
X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank
X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank
\stoptext
Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past?
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past?
repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization)
~, by the way, appears not to be respected in math mode; example:
\starttext
$3\times
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past?
repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization)
~, by the way, appears not to be respected in math mode; example:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past?
repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization)
~, by the
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past?
repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote:
Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Münster wrote:
Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the
past?
repaired in next beta (was unwanted side
Hello,
This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not:
\starttext
X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank
X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank
X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank
\stoptext
Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past?
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact
11 matches
Mail list logo