Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2010-07-05 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Sunday 07 June 2009 16:55:59 Hans Hagen wrote: Taco Hoekwater wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \,

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-09 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Should there be a difference (perhaps THIN SPACE breakable)? Yes, U+2009 is supposed to be breakable. Arthur ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-09 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: Should there be a difference (perhaps THIN SPACE breakable)? Yes, U+2009 is supposed to be breakable. Ok, but not the case in ConTeXt: \starttext \hsize1pt bla bla \stoptext Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-08 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Hello, This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not: \starttext X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank \stoptext Should this

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: Hello, This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not: \starttext X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank \stoptext Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past?

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past? repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization) ~, by the way, appears not to be respected in math mode; example: \starttext $3\times

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past? repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization) ~, by the way, appears not to be respected in math mode; example:

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past? repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of optimization) ~, by the

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past? repaired in next beta (was unwanted side effect of

Re: [NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-07 Thread Hans Hagen
Taco Hoekwater wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 14:10:10 Hans Hagen wrote: Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:12:11 Hans Hagen wrote: Peter Münster wrote: Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past? repaired in next beta (was unwanted side

[NTG-context] unicode no-break spaces

2009-06-05 Thread Peter Münster
Hello, This used to work with MKIV, but with today's version, it does not: \starttext X X THIN SPACE (U+2009)\blank X X NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE (U+202F)\blank X X NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0)\blank \stoptext Should this work, or should we rather use ~ and \, as in the past? Cheers, Peter -- Contact