Michael Saunders wrote:
\definefontfeature[su][default][sups=yes]%superior
\definefontfeature[nu][default][numr=yes]%numerator
I may be missing something on my side, but I can't get sups=yes
to work at all.
\definefontfeature[default][default][mode=node,script=latn,sups=yes]
Sorry, I meant the first only.
There are two commands \bibitem and \bibsource which are not clear
to me.
When i decode the code (ugly formatting) correct this works:
\starttext
bla \in{book}[knuth:1] bla
bla \bibref[knuth:2]{} bla
bla \bibref[knuth:3]{} bla
On 13-4-2010 12:58, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:41:59PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12-4-2010 9:43, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marco wrote:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer necessary when you have a
opentype font
with the smcp
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I may be missing something on my side, but I can't get sups=yes
to work at all.
\definefontfeature[default][default][mode=node,script=latn,sups=yes]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,11pt]
It may well be that this palatino doesn't have the sups feature. Let
me put it this
On 13-4-2010 12:16, Michael Saunders wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I may be missing something on my side, but I can't get sups=yes
to work at all.
\definefontfeature[default][default][mode=node,script=latn,sups=yes]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,11pt]
It may well be that this palatino
On 13-4-2010 6:20, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 12.04.10 21:53, schrieb Bernhard Rosensteiner:
Hello,
i just updated my minimals and now i get an undefined control sequence
error with my previous working file
attached is the log file. Please help!
Make a minimal example!
should work ok in
Michael Saunders wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I may be missing something on my side, but I can't get sups=yes
to work at all.
\definefontfeature[default][default][mode=node,script=latn,sups=yes]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,11pt]
It may well be that this palatino doesn't have the sups
On 13 avr. 2010, at 04:13, Troy Henderson wrote:
I'm trying to follow
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/rsfs
to get a script L in math mode (to denote Laplace Transform) but to no
avail. I followed the code in the first section, but I get the
following compilation error. Any help is
this is not the place to elaborate on this (more for the usual font bof
session at bachotek) but to some extend it's a packaging issue: why a
full smallcaps embedded but not an italic
Actually, you can do that with OpenType: there is an 'ital' feature,
and using it would allow to embed
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
\setupfootnotes[textcommand=,numbercommand=,style=,bodyfont=]
Thanks, Taco. I tried the following:
\setupfootnotes[textcommand=,numbercommand=,style=,bodyfont=]
\starttext
text1\footnote{1footnote}
\stoptext
and it almost works. The third and fourth '1' look the
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:13:49PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-4-2010 12:58, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:41:59PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12-4-2010 9:43, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Marco wrote:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer
I don't go to TeX conferences, so mailing lists is the only place I can
discuss such stuff, and TeX Gyre fonts don't have a mailing list, AFAIK.
You can write to the TeX Gyre team...
Arthur
___
If your
On Tue, Apr 13 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
\starttext
text1\footnote{1footnote}
\stoptext
This will produce four instances of the numeral '1'. Suppose I want
them all to look exactly alike. In other words, suppose I didn't want
either footnote mark to be rescaled or elevated at all. How
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:48:27PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
this is not the place to elaborate on this (more for the usual font bof
session at bachotek) but to some extend it's a packaging issue: why a
full smallcaps embedded but not an italic
Actually, you can do that with
Am 12.04.10 21:23, schrieb Marco:
With MkIV \cap and \nocap is no longer necessary when you have a
opentype font
with the smcp (smallcapitals) and c2sc (capitals to smallcapitals)
features.
Thanks for your explanation. But why doesn't your example work with the
latin modern fonts? Don't
On Tue, Apr 13 2010, Michael Saunders wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
\setupfootnotes[textcommand=,numbercommand=,style=,bodyfont=]
Thanks, Taco. I tried the following:
\setupfootnotes[textcommand=,numbercommand=,style=,bodyfont=]
\starttext
text1\footnote{1footnote}
\stoptext
On 13-4-2010 12:48, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
this is not the place to elaborate on this (more for the usual font bof
session at bachotek) but to some extend it's a packaging issue: why a
full smallcaps embedded but not an italic
Actually, you can do that with OpenType: there is an 'ital'
italic correction or italic alternates?
Italic alternates.
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_fj.htm#ital
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
On 13-4-2010 1:03, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Fontforge in script mode does not require X, mingw is enough, and AFAIK
latest FF CVS can be compiled under mingw without patching. One can
always run FF under some virtual machine etc. But to run Windows I need
a Windows license which I cannot afford.
On 13-4-2010 1:54, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
italic correction or italic alternates?
Italic alternates.
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_fj.htm#ital
interesting is that combining them in one font can help kerning although
kerning in cjk is not much of an issue
Peter M?nster wrote:
\setupfootnotes[numbercommand=, textcommand=, style=, textstyle=,
bodyfont=]
Thanks, Peter. With some experimentation I got what I wanted. For
the record, I'm using:
\definefontfeature[su][body][sups=yes,ordn=yes]%superior
Hi,
in MKII the following code produces the wrong result ('* x;')
\usemodule[verb-c]
\starttext
\startC
int* x;
\stopC
\stoptext
I know that I should use \definetyping[C][option=C] instead of
\usemodule.
The fact is, what I am actually loading is a customized verb-c file that
I've put inside
On 13-4-2010 12:41, Otared Kavian wrote:
On 13 avr. 2010, at 04:13, Troy Henderson wrote:
I'm trying to follow
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/rsfs
to get a script L in math mode (to denote Laplace Transform) but to no
avail. I followed the code in the first section, but I get the
following
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 23:53, Matija Šuklje wrote:
In the document's bibliography then it could be rendered something like
this:
Wikipedia: ConTeXt; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ConTeXt; as seen on the
day: 12th of April 2010 at 13:45
With http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ConTeXt; being a
Dne torek 13. aprila 2010 ob 18:36:13 je Mojca Miklavec napisal(a):
It's a nice idea, though in my opinion not something that should be
enabled by default, but maybe being easily accesible with some keyword
combination should do. (You probably need to create your own style for
citing web pages
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:00:39PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 13-4-2010 1:03, Khaled Hosny wrote:
They already shipped glyphs with such poor artistic value, being in the
Ghostscript fonts is not an excuse, they could have resorted to the
original URW fonts, which were released under GPL, from
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
I don't go to TeX conferences, so mailing lists is the only place I can
discuss such stuff, and TeX Gyre fonts don't have a mailing list, AFAIK.
You can write to the TeX Gyre team...
And their contact info is listed in...
On Apr 13, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
BTW, I just checked ghostscript fonts shipped with my distro and they
don't have any of the crappy Greek glyphs TeX Gyre have (neither do the
files linked from TeX Gyre web page), so I don't know from where TeX
Gyre got those.
I contacted
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
I don't go to TeX conferences, so mailing lists is the only place I can
discuss such stuff, and TeX Gyre fonts don't have a mailing list, AFAIK.
You can write to the TeX Gyre team...
And their contact
And their contact info is listed in... ?
The TeX Gyre page starts with a list of names. And the first paper in
the Readings section lists e-mail addresses. Have you tried
contacting them?
Arthur
___
If
Le 13 avril 2010 à 01:24, Peter Münster a écrit:
Hello,
See here:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100413.111638.965cf779.en.html
and here:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Reference/en/setupfootnotes
It's not a detailed documentation of \setupfootnotes but at least you get
an
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 07:33:22PM +0200, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Apr 13, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
BTW, I just checked ghostscript fonts shipped with my distro and they
don't have any of the crappy Greek glyphs TeX Gyre have (neither do the
files linked from TeX Gyre
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 07:37:04PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
I don't go to TeX conferences, so mailing lists is the only place I can
discuss such stuff, and TeX Gyre fonts don't have a mailing list,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 07:51:48PM +0200, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
And their contact info is listed in... ?
The TeX Gyre page starts with a list of names. And the first paper in
the Readings section lists e-mail addresses. Have you tried
contacting them?
Apparently not, again for some
Am 13.04.10 19:52, schrieb Sebastien Mengin:
Sorry, a bit off topic, but: is \setupfootnotes[] a synonym for
\setupnote[footnote][] ?
Yes, it is.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
Sebastien Mengin:
Sorry, a bit off topic, but: is \setupfootnotes[] a synonym for
\setupnote[footnote][] ?
Besides
\setupfootnotes[]
and
\setupnote[footnote][]
there are:
\setupenumerations[footnote][]
and
\setupfootnotedefinition[]
and maybe more.
I have no idea how they are related or even
Sebastien Mengin wrote:
Le 13 avril 2010 à 01:24, Peter Münster a écrit:
Hello,
See here:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100413.111638.965cf779.en.html
and here:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Reference/en/setupfootnotes
It's not a detailed documentation of \setupfootnotes but at
Apparently not, again for some reason I'd always the feeling that they
are not interested in feedback
I wonder how you got that feeling if you never made contact with
them...
(I also usually try to provide fixes with
my bug reports, but I can't really do
Le 13 avril 2010 à 08:13, Taco Hoekwater a écrit:
Sorry, a bit off topic, but: is \setupfootnotes[] a synonym for
\setupnote[footnote][] ?
Yes, the actual definition is:
\def\setupfootnotes {\setupnote [\v!footnote]}
Thanks a lot.
which reminds me: at some point we should add wiki
Sebastien Mengin wrote:
which reminds me: at some point we should add wiki redirects or
stub pages for
Reference/en/startitemize = Reference/en/startenumeration
So I guess there is a list of all those synonyms available?
Not readily, they follow from \define.. commands in the source
Hello,
What happened with bold math?
\mathbf does not have any effect.
\setupbodyfont[mscore,rm,12pt]
\starttext
$${\mathbf x}'(t) = f({\mathbf x}(t), {\mathbf u}(t), t)$$
\stoptext
Regards,
Vyatcheslav
\setupbodyfont[mscore,rm,12pt]
\starttext
$${\mathbf x}'(t) = f({\mathbf x}(t),
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.lists at gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 21:24, Willi Egger wrote:
I just updated the latest beta in a completely new tree:
I get now the following message:
.../lua60/tex/texmf-osx-intel/bin/context: line 2: 1634 Bus error
mtxrun --script
Michael Green wrote:
I hit a similar problem on a ppc mac. So it's probably not an intel-only
thing.
The .firstsetup script crashes. It worked fine through at least March
23, for what it's worth.
Here's a transcript
I have a crash log too, if that would help.
Does that contain a stack
43 matches
Mail list logo
