Dear Gerben or Hans,
I have been away on holiday. So I have lost the result of this thread. Have
you or Hans solved this problem. If so, do I need to upgrade i-tetex or
ConTeXt or both. I would really like to solve this problem and get back to
standard ConTeXt fonts.
TIA
From: Hans Hagen [EMAIL
At 00:05 07/08/2003 +0200, Gerben Wierda wrote:
Yes, this could be. If texexec or any ConTeXt tool does not use texmf.cnf
values but has hardcoded ideas about where to find stuff (texmf), then the
rearranging of the texmf directories could have an influence. Hans can
probably say if this is
On Wednesday, Aug 6, 2003, at 22:21 Europe/Amsterdam, Nigel King wrote:
Hi,
I am posting this message I posted to the 'OS X TeX' group earlier
this year
relating to the same issue that Mathew is raising. I had no luck then
but am
hoping for more success now there are two of us.
Hans says
'this
Hi,
I am posting this message I posted to the 'OS X TeX' group earlier this year
relating to the same issue that Mathew is raising. I had no luck then but am
hoping for more success now there are two of us.
Hans says
'this is under discussion now with thomas/staszek/etc: has to do with urw
Matt,
I just read somewhere that this batch compile won't work unless the source
and destination are the same.
Aha! I found where I read this:
http://www.pragma-ade.com:8080/context/Members/guravage/myways/TexfontExamin
ed.pdf
At 02:37 PM 8/3/03 +0900, you wrote:
Hi:
When I run texfont as
Hi:
When I run texfont as follows:
texfont --en=texnansi --fontroot=/usr/share/texmf/fonts
/usr/share/context/data/type-tmf.dat
texfont reports unknown subpath ../fonts/afm/urw/[font name] for each
font listed in type-tmf.dat. Where should the fonts be found?
Thanks,
Matt
