Am 26.01.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\startbuffer[demo]
doc
pThis context is not ConTeXt./p
/doc
\stopbuffer
\starttext
\startxmlsetups xml:initialize
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{p|doc}{xml:*}
\stopxmlsetups
Am 26.01.2015 um 16:19 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es:
On 01/26/2015 02:40 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
[...]
Hans uses for the documentation of the Lua code logo label=context/
to print the ConTeXt logo, to do so the following setup is used (copied
from x-ldx.mkiv):
On 01/26/2015 04:33 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
[...]
To replace text in your input you can try to use the translate module.
\usemodule[translate]
\translateinput[ConTeXt][\CONTEXT]
\starttext
This document was produced with ConTeXt.
\enableinputtranslation
This document was
On 01/26/2015 02:40 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
[...]
Hans uses for the documentation of the Lua code logo label=context/
to print the ConTeXt logo, to do so the following setup is used (copied
from x-ldx.mkiv):
\startxmlsetups ldx:logo
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 21:52, Xan wrote:
So it has transparent background, but why gimp says that eps does not
support transparency? Strange. Really strange.
At least in older versions of (E)PS you cannot use transparent blue
or transparent red to fill shapes for example. But the background
En/na Aditya Mahajan ha escrit:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Xan wrote:
Yes, Wolfgang. Now I understand it.
The actually process is:
texexec prova.tex -- prova.pdf and prova-mpgraph.1 (eps file)
generated.
and I see what you said.
So it has transparent background, but why gimp says that eps does
En/na Mojca Miklavec ha escrit:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 21:52, Xan wrote:
So it has transparent background, but why gimp says that eps does not
support transparency? Strange. Really strange.
At least in older versions of (E)PS you cannot use transparent blue
or transparent red to fill
Xan wrote:
Mojca, how is this script for converting pdf file to (newest) eps? For
seeing if newest eps supports transparency.
This has nothing to do with 'newest eps'. It is to do with the appalling
support for the eps format in the gimp. Eps has had transparant
backgrounds since day one (a
En/na Taco Hoekwater ha escrit:
Xan wrote:
Mojca, how is this script for converting pdf file to (newest) eps?
For seeing if newest eps supports transparency.
This has nothing to do with 'newest eps'. It is to do with the appalling
support for the eps format in the gimp. Eps has had
En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit:
Am 14.03.2009 um 14:50 schrieb Xan:
How can I get the background were transaparent? (not white)
What do you mean, the background is already transparent.
Wolfgang
__
Wolfgang, when I run texexec prova.tex I obtain prova.pdf and
prova-mpgraph.1 Both files
logo.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Am 14.03.2009 um 16:45 schrieb Xan:
Wolfgang, when I run texexec prova.tex I obtain prova.pdf and prova-
mpgraph.1 Both files have background white and not transparent
background. I don't know how explain it.
Perhaps this
En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit:
Am 14.03.2009 um 16:45 schrieb Xan:
Wolfgang, when I run texexec prova.tex I obtain prova.pdf and
prova-mpgraph.1 Both files have background white and not transparent
background. I don't know how explain it.
Perhaps this
Am 14.03.2009 um 17:15 schrieb Xan:
Eh? Green? I think in transparent.
I tried to show you the included pdf had a transparent background, the
color is unimportant.
I transform your logo.pdf with GIMP and applying transparency in
green color. The result I save as png file (gimp says me
En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit:
Am 14.03.2009 um 17:15 schrieb Xan:
Eh? Green? I think in transparent.
I tried to show you the included pdf had a transparent background, the
color is unimportant.
Eh? Can you explain with more details this fact?. I see green the
blackground. Why do you
Am 14.03.2009 um 20:22 schrieb Xan:
I tried to show you the included pdf had a transparent background,
the color is unimportant.
Eh? Can you explain with more details this fact?. I see green the
blackground. Why do you say that it's not important and transparent?
Let me explain this on
En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit:
Am 14.03.2009 um 20:22 schrieb Xan:
I tried to show you the included pdf had a transparent background,
the color is unimportant.
Eh? Can you explain with more details this fact?. I see green the
blackground. Why do you say that it's not important and
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Xan wrote:
Yes, Wolfgang. Now I understand it.
The actually process is:
texexec prova.tex -- prova.pdf and prova-mpgraph.1 (eps file) generated.
and I see what you said.
So it has transparent background, but why gimp says that eps does not support
transparency? Strange.
Dne torek 5. februarja 2008 je Matija Šuklje napisal(a):
No, it was a presentation in Cyberpipe (video will be available on
http://video.kiberpipa.org in a few days/weeks) ;)
Actually, here it is already:
http://video.kiberpipa.org/media/POT_Mojca_Miklavec-ConTeXt-Latex_v_novi_preobleki/raw.html
The Content-Type is wrong :-D (Actually, missing altogether ...)
p.s. the presentation is in Slovene, but you can still admire the costume and
the cowfont ;)
Grml, missing Theora codecs somehow
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
http://video.kiberpipa.org/media/POT_Mojca_Miklavec-ConTeXt-Latex_v_novi_preobleki/raw.html
The Content-Type is wrong :-D (Actually, missing altogether ...)
p.s. the presentation is in Slovene, but you can still admire the costume
and
the cowfont ;)
Le 06 février à 18:12:30 Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
|
http://video.kiberpipa.org/media/POT_Mojca_Miklavec-ConTeXt-Latex_v_novi_preobleki/raw.html
|
|The Content-Type is wrong :-D (Actually, missing altogether ...)
|
| p.s. the presentation
Am 06.02.2008 um 19:00 schrieb Jean Magnan de Bornier:
Le 06 février à 18:12:30 Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
| http://video.kiberpipa.org/media/POT_Mojca_Miklavec-ConTeXt-
Latex_v_novi_preobleki/raw.html
|
|The Content-Type is wrong :-D
Dne sreda 6. februarja 2008 je Steffen Wolfrum napisal(a):
Where is the cowfont actually ?
In the titles/sections of the slides ;)
Cheers,
Matija
--
gsm: +386 41 849 552
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://matija.suklje.name
aim: hookofsilver
icq: 110183360
jabber/g-talk: [EMAIL
Are you preparing the new T-shirts? ;o)
Steffen
Am 05.02.2008 um 16:18 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
Hello Taco (or other cow fans),
What's the easiest way to get the ConTeXt logo with the cow font
(possibly in mkiv, but not neccessary)? Do I need to use low-level
(Lua) or is there already some
Steffen == Steffen Wolfrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steffen Are you preparing the new T-shirts? ;o) Steffen
I want one :-D
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Zagreb, Croatia | GPG key: C6E7162D
pgpvUS0XtNgNC.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi Mojca,
Mojca Miklavec schrieb:
Hello Taco (or other cow fans),
What's the easiest way to get the ConTeXt logo with the cow font
(possibly in mkiv, but not neccessary)? Do I need to use low-level
(Lua) or is there already some kind of \getglyph{C_o_n_T_e_X_t}
already available?
I
Dne torek 5. februarja 2008 je Steffen Wolfrum napisal(a):
Are you preparing the new T-shirts? ;o)
No, it was a presentation in Cyberpipe (video will be available on
http://video.kiberpipa.org in a few days/weeks) ;)
Cheers,
Matija
--
gsm: +386 41 849 552
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello Taco (or other cow fans),
What's the easiest way to get the ConTeXt logo with the cow font
(possibly in mkiv, but not neccessary)? Do I need to use low-level
(Lua) or is there already some kind of \getglyph{C_o_n_T_e_X_t}
already available?
\usesymbols[cow]
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
All (and especially Hans...),
where is \CONTEXT (the logo) defined? Looking at the output I get, I
wonder if it doesn't need a bit of kerning between Con and the
following T; there's quite a gap between these two letters (at least in
the font I'm using).
Have a
Wonderful, thanks Taco! I see that somebody had played around with
kerning the \TeX-part, there was a commented line. I tried a somewhat
higher value than the default 0.667em, and it seems to be looking
better now!
Best
Thomas
On Dec 4, 2005, at 3:18 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thomas A.
Idris Samawi Hamid said this at Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:07:10 -0600:
\definetypeface [palatino] [rm] [serif] [palatino] [default] [encoding=ec]
\switchtotypeface[palatino]
\starttext
I love \Context\ very much!
\stoptext
===
And the logo remains in lmr. I can work around this:
31 matches
Mail list logo
