Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I believe that the version 3.33 works, but I can't find it anywhere.
i mailed you a copy yesterday (1 meg attachment) but you rmail agent may be to
picky on zip files
Hans
-
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I tried it out before reading that paragraph and I can approve: unless
you have an ancient GS, it doesn't work at all. 3.40 at least does
something even though it crashes.
but i have no problems here with gs 8.51 (all 8 versions worked ok) and pstoedit
3.33, so how recen
Jojo wrote:
>Would you plan to release a Chinese version? I am glad to be a volunteer translate
>for that.
>
>
could be a challenge, remind me later (once the source code of the manual is stable
translation should be no problem)
Hans
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep, it seems to work...it generates metafun.mem in the same directory it
was invoked...
do I have to invoke
texexec --make --alone
in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ?
I have not seen anything like that mentioned in install document...
th
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hi,
but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from
pragma-ade downloading page...
is it not the right place/version?
that is the only authorative(spelling?) place to download... There
are mirrors, but I don't know how uptodate they are.
The output
yep, it seems to work...it generates metafun.mem in the same directory it
was invoked...
do I have to invoke
texexec --make --alone
in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ?
I have not seen anything like that mentioned in install document...
is lattest version of Tex
you are right...mine is 3.1
but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from
pragma-ade downloading page...
is it not the right place/version?
where should I get the lattest?
thanks again !
Jose
> Hi,
>
> try texexec --alone --make metafun
>
> and your texexec is (as far as
