Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-13 Thread Adam Lindsay
Hans Hagen said this at Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:38:25 +0200:

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

 OK, I'm answering my own post. The plot thickens. It looks like this  
 has something to do with file names. It only happens when I have a  
 name with a period in it.

 Bug or feature? You decide, Hans!

bug; but does this mean that the old texexec works ok? 

Hang on, could this have to do with the following web2c setting?
 allow_multiple_suffixes = f

(as seen in minstall.pdf...)
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Lancaster University, InfoLab21+44(0)1524/510.514
 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-13 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hmm -- this is getting curioser and curioser... 
I just verified on my linux partition, and I can confirm that 
I don't have the problem there; it's only in OS X. (I'm having 
different problems with my linux install, but that'll be 
another post...). So Adam's educated guess that it must be some
 setting in a config file is more  than probably right. I'll 
keep you posted about this.

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 10:26 +0100, Adam Lindsay wrote:
 Hans Hagen said this at Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:38:25 +0200:
 
 Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
 
  OK, I'm answering my own post. The plot thickens. It looks like this  
  has something to do with file names. It only happens when I have a  
  name with a period in it.
 
  Bug or feature? You decide, Hans!
 
 bug; but does this mean that the old texexec works ok? 
 
 Hang on, could this have to do with the following web2c setting?
  allow_multiple_suffixes = f
 
 (as seen in minstall.pdf...)

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-13 Thread Hans Hagen

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:


OK, I'm back on OS X and checked:

1. created file 01_01_01.tex with this content:
\starttext

\startuseMPgraphic{circle}

draw fullcircle scaled 10 cm ;

\stopuseMPgraphic

\useMPgraphic{circle}

\stoptext

compiled fine; circle was there.

2. copied file to 01.01.01.tex. Compilation does not give errors, but  
there is no visible output.


3. Treid setting allow_multiple_suffixes = t in texmf.cnf - no  
difference.


Puzzled

Thomas


it's a tricky thins: 

in order to determine a suffix programs/scripts assume that in 01.01.01 the last 01 is the suffix (there is no rule that tex is the suffix, it's just the built in fallback); 


someprogram 01.01.01
someprogram 01.01.01.tex 

is different. The multiple suffixes always test for a tex file first but that results in two file searches each time (slows down). 

texexec 01.01.01.tex works ok 
texexec 01.01.01 fails 

newtexexec fails in both cases (i will look into that) 


It's kind of tricky to auto append tex since nowadasy we have xml and other 
variants ..

Hans 





-
 Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
 Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-12 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
OK, I'm answering my own post. The plot thickens. It looks like this  
has something to do with file names. It only happens when I have a  
name with a period in it. Thusly, file 05.11.08.tex will not run MP  
to PDF, when I copy the exact same file to 05_11_08.tex, everything  
works as it should.


This may have something to do with the fact (as I just found out)  
that newtexexec doesn't even want to touch these files. I have two  
identical files in a directory, one called 05.10.18.tex, the other  
05_10_18.tex. Here's what happens when I run newtexexec on them:


TeXExec | processing document '05.10.18.tex'
TeXExec | runtime: 0.006379

(and that's it. No output, no action)

TeXExec | processing document '05_10_18.tex'
TeXExec | tex processing method: context
TeXExec | TeX run 1
TeXExec | tex engine: pdfetex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
TeXExec | progname: context
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.3-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.5)
\write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./05_10_18.tex

ConTeXt  ver: 2005.09.08  fmt: 2005.9.9  int: english  mes: english

[snip]

and so on.

Bug or feature? You decide, Hans!

Best

Thomas

On Sep 12, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

This one hast just cost me two hours, and I'm still baffled. The  
story (in shorthand):  was trying to integrate a positional metafun  
graphic into a presentation. I got no output. I tried making a  
minimal example file to reproduce the problem, and sure enough,  
everything went fine. I rebuilt the entire file, by pasting one  
paragraph of the original file at a time, and I got exactly the  
output I wanted. [Drumroll] I deleted the original file and  
everything associated with it [i.e. all those .tui and .tuo etc.],  
saved the new file from my /tmp directory to my working directory,  
and -- I got no output again. diff shows that both files are  
identical. Looking at the logs, there's only one difference I can  
spot:


 \openout5 = `test-mpgraph.mp'.
---
 \openout5 = `05.11.08-mpgraph.mp'.
205,206c206,207
  [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.1) [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.2)
 [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.3)
---
  [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.1] [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.2]
 [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.3]
211c212
 systems : end file test at line 426
---
 systems : end file 05.11.08 at line 426
213c214
 [flush and process test-mpgraph.mp afterwards] )
---
 [flush and process 05.11.08-mpgraph.mp afterwards] )

The MP to PDF part is missing from the file 05.11.08, which might  
explain why I don't see anything in the resulting pdf. But why? Can  
anybody enlighten me why the same file can behave differently? And  
how I can coax ConTeXt into running this MP to PDF thingy? Thanks


Thomas
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context



___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-12 Thread Taco Hoekwater

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
working directory,  and -- I got no output again. diff shows that both 
files are  identical. Looking at the logs, there's only one difference I 
can spot:


Perhaps it can be that something decides that your file has the
interesting filename extension '11.08-mpgraph.mp' instead of just
'.mp'?

Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-12 Thread Hans Hagen

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

OK, I'm answering my own post. The plot thickens. It looks like this  
has something to do with file names. It only happens when I have a  
name with a period in it. Thusly, file 05.11.08.tex will not run MP  
to PDF, when I copy the exact same file to 05_11_08.tex, everything  
works as it should.


This may have something to do with the fact (as I just found out)  
that newtexexec doesn't even want to touch these files. I have two  
identical files in a directory, one called 05.10.18.tex, the other  
05_10_18.tex. Here's what happens when I run newtexexec on them:


TeXExec | processing document '05.10.18.tex'
TeXExec | runtime: 0.006379

(and that's it. No output, no action)

TeXExec | processing document '05_10_18.tex'
TeXExec | tex processing method: context
TeXExec | TeX run 1
TeXExec | tex engine: pdfetex
TeXExec | tex format: cont-en
TeXExec | progname: context
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.3-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.5)
\write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./05_10_18.tex

ConTeXt  ver: 2005.09.08  fmt: 2005.9.9  int: english  mes: english

[snip]

and so on.

Bug or feature? You decide, Hans!


bug; but does this mean that the old texexec works ok? 

Hans 



-
 Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
 Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-12 Thread Hans Hagen

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

This one hast just cost me two hours, and I'm still baffled. The  
story (in shorthand):  was trying to integrate a positional metafun  
graphic into a presentation. I got no output. I tried making a  
minimal example file to reproduce the problem, and sure enough,  
everything went fine. I rebuilt the entire file, by pasting one  
paragraph of the original file at a time, and I got exactly the  
output I wanted. [Drumroll] I deleted the original file and  
everything associated with it [i.e. all those .tui and .tuo etc.],  
saved the new file from my /tmp directory to my working directory,  
and -- I got no output again. diff shows that both files are  
identical. Looking at the logs, there's only one difference I can spot:


 \openout5 = `test-mpgraph.mp'.
---
 \openout5 = `05.11.08-mpgraph.mp'.
205,206c206,207
  [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.1) [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.2)
 [MP to PDF] (./test-mpgraph.3)
---
  [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.1] [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.2]
 [MP 05.11.08-mpgraph.3]
211c212
 systems : end file test at line 426
---
 systems : end file 05.11.08 at line 426
213c214
 [flush and process test-mpgraph.mp afterwards] )
---
 [flush and process 05.11.08-mpgraph.mp afterwards] )

The MP to PDF part is missing from the file 05.11.08, which might  
explain why I don't see anything in the resulting pdf. But why? Can  
anybody enlighten me why the same file can behave differently? And  
how I can coax ConTeXt into running this MP to PDF thingy? Thanks


So the only difference in the source files is the filename? (should not 
make much of a difference because mp conversion is rather stupid)


Hans  


-
 Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
 Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-12 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Well, at least the old texexec processes the file. However, the  
problem with metafun graphics I described occurs in the old texexec  
(I'm not at all sure if the two problems are related).


Thomas

On Sep 12, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:


bug; but does this mean that the old texexec works ok?
Hans



___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] puzzling metafun graphics

2005-09-12 Thread Hans Hagen

Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:

Well, at least the old texexec processes the file. However, the  
problem with metafun graphics I described occurs in the old texexec  
(I'm not at all sure if the two problems are related).


can you make me a smal test file? 

Hans 


-
 Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
 Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-

___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context