http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office-365-service-descriptions.aspx
- although you should look at the description appropriate to your geographic
locality. I certainly won't touch 1 or 2.
3 - there isn't any.
4 - depends on the plan you buy.
5 - after a period of time the data is
I though I read somewhere that the European Union is recommending not to
use American Cloud services?
The US Government is open about going through the data in the cloud.
Kind of a problem for a foreign company...
Jon
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Graeme Carstairs
Biggest problem for a solicitor would be client confidentiality, surely?
And as, according to the Snowden revelations, both the NSA and GCHQ have their
mitts all over 'the cloud'...
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Infrastructure Engineer
Hoople Ltd | Thorn Office Centre | Hereford HR2 6JT
Tel: 01432
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive/2013/08/01/free-ebook-introducing-windows-server-2012-r2-preview-release.aspx
John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352)-244-1610
Cell (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I,
They are all over the Internet it seems not just the Cloud Providers.
tapping the network at the peering points. They can monitor all traffic not
just the Cloud Providers.
Cheers
Ryan
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Randal, Phil
There is a different set of responses from Microsoft to address the EU specific
requirements.
If you start at http://trust.office365.com/ you can then get to the EU Model
Clauses common questions -
The Impression I get from the client (though he hasnt came right out and
said it) is that he is not really wanting to go cloud, but feels, that as
MS have removed Exchange from Small Business Server, and that he is having
to upgrade a working system to new software, that he has to look at the
The announcement of PRISM itself has a been a deal breaker for several folks
I've had considering cloud solutions.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:23 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Swapping a lot of my users HDs to SSDs. I've been doing this after the user
leaves for the day, connecting the drive via SATA, and cloning. ~40GB, and
takes me about 2 hours each.
Need to a way to speed this up. These are all laptops which the user almost
always takes home.
Is there a
Could you? Yes
Should you? Maybe
Consolidation of SQL can be a good thing, but there are a few gotchas:
Some apps that load their own instance of SQL (WebJetAdmin!) can be a problem
working with a remote SQL server
The various apps you have talking to SQL may not all play nice with the same
Do you know your IOPS, memory, and processor requirements?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of David McSpadden
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:40 PM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [NTSysADM] Virtualization of servers in the
Ok.
Good. The apps that are sqlexpress local machine bound I will disregard
until last.
The odbc web to sql or .net to sql type configs I will jump on support
to get them pulled apart.
That way I only have one box for SQL updates and security.
As long as I can get the mom and pop installs
Getting them from the vendors. I have what is being used over the last
30 days but that is serverwide not just SQL. I am getting the vendors
to give me their best guess as to what their software requires.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
thanks damien and glen. i think i'll go ahead with option #2. i already have
the MS tech article on how to rename a sql server so that isn't a concern.
appreciate the insight.
jesse
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on
The only thing that might get you is SPN (Service Principal Names) that might
be registered in AD with the old name and new name that might need cleaned up.
Otherwise, a side by side migration is always the safest.
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, CISA, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
I agree with everyone else, go with option 2. Might be a good time to
research the possibility of updating all of your client ODBC connections to
reference the DB by cname rather than server name.
- Sean
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
Question why not just create the server off network from the old one with the
correct name in the first place migrate the DB's thru intermediate means and
then take the old server out of the picture putting in the new one. All that
would be needed would be joining the domain for the new one
Or use SQL Server aliases (configure in the SQL Server client) instead of CNAMEs
Update the (local) alias on the SQL Server after renaming (if this is still
required for SQL Server 2008 R2)
Cheers
Ken
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of
For anything other than a small environment, this would be a PITA.
a) Building the server and getting services running (and thus being able
to do your system acceptance test) would require AD connectivity
b) After migrating the databases, being able to test the migration would
19 matches
Mail list logo
