I'm a lead, and therefore salaried/exempt. My minions are hourly. We
both get the on-call pay, at the same rate.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Durf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, I should have thought to ask whether folks were working salaried,
hourly/fulltime or hourly/contract. I
Oh, yeah. If the person on-call does get a call, and has to show up on
site to take care of it, it's a mandatory minimum of three hours at
time-and-a-half. I have also charged that rate if it's taken more than
hour of working from home. A ticket must be started for each incident,
too.
Kurt
On
That's silly.
You're paid the extra to discourage the company/customer from using
after-hours calls frivolously.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Durf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try $250+. :)
The argument we've been given before against extra compensation is that we
don't want to encourage
I am not on salary as well but I can tell you how it goes in Italy.
It depends on salary level . If you are a low(1-6) level salaried you
get paid for extra hours .If you are level 7 or more every thing is more
flexible, so if you have to complete a task you must do it. But if you
are not so
Salaried, have a rotating on call BB/Pager that we carry for 2 weeks, then
pass it off to the next person. Lets see, there are 4 of us sharing the on
call duties, so I get it about every other month. Rarely have any calls or
emergencies. Compensation is flex time. That being said, I'm not on
Here's an interesting discussion on the topic:
http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1070273page=2
One poster talks about software engineers and why they're not really
engineers, but his points apply to network people just as well:
1) Low barrier to entry into the profession
2) Desire to
Thanks for those who had responded. We were able to get this resolved.
The systems, by the way, were iMacs with ATI chipsets. Microsoft tech support
told us that the particular model in these units could only support extended
displays, not mirrored displays. That didn't make a lot of sense to
In this case, is there a performance hit difference between having 50+
subfolders under the Mailbox vs. having them under the Inbox ? We haave
Symantec¹s Enterprise Vault in place to archive items in the mailbox but
thus far we¹ve been telling users to either create subfolders under the
mailbox or
In the Exchange database, everything is either a folder, or an item. That
part of the schema is very flat.
And often a folder is an item too - when you are performing operations on
that folder.
So, 1,000 or 5,000 items; whatever, in your critical path includes the
folders; but it does NOT
A mix of 3 and 5 for me.
For planned project work, I get paid at an OT rate - however for work that
goes over into out of hours then usually I just get the time back.
Im a full time employee for a IT solutions provider.
Gavin.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Durf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 18 August 2008 12:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: So, Why Do We Do It?
I'm not so much concerned about the specific titles used as I am about
sysadmins, as a group, being paid well for their expertise and time. Call me
When I look at the number of IT people I know-really good people with great
expertise-who put in a ton of hours for mediocre pay, I can't help but conclude
that it's just not that easy to go out and negotiate more pay. My sense is that
jobs like yours are few and far between.
I absolutely
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 18 August 2008 10:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: So, Why Do We Do It?
When I look at the number of IT people I know-really good people with great
expertise-who put in a ton of hours for mediocre pay, I can't help but
13 matches
Mail list logo
