[Nuke-users] ftrack/Annex Pro happy hour Tuesday at Siggraph
Hi, Just a quick note to anyone who wants an early afternoon drink, ftrack and Annex Pro are co-hosting an informal happy hour at Siggraph on Tuesday August 12th from 4-6pm at The Rouge Kitchen Wetbar at the Convention Center. We'll have a sneak peak of ftrack V3 featuring additional Nuke/Hiero integration to show and all the beers you can drink. details RSVP here: ftrack Happy Hour at SIGGRAPH 2014 ftrack Happy Hour at SIGGRAPH 2014 Join colleagues and friends for the ftrack Happy Hour at Rogue Convention Centre [kitty-corner from Convention Centre entrance] 4pm - 6pm, Tuesday, August 12 Joi... View on ftrack-happy-hour.even... Preview by Yahoo ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] STMap produces line where right and left image edge join
Make sure the centre of the uv map is 0.5 for each pixel not 0 Ie (x+0.5)/width, (y+0.5)/height I think I have the right expression at work. Howard On 6 Aug 2014, at 08:12 pm, Patrick Heinen mailingli...@patrickheinen.com wrote: Hey Ryan, the UV map I have is created in Nuke and even not filtering it doesn't get rid of that one line :( And blurring only makes it worse in my case. Appreciate your help though. cheers, Patrick Ryan O'Phelan wrote on 04.08.2014 21:27: When you render uv maps, don't filter or antialias them, and you will not have edging issues. Adding bilateral or gaussian blur to everything but the edges helps too. Hope that helps. R On Aug 3, 2014 3:12 PM, Patrick Heinen mailingli...@patrickheinen.com mailto:mailingli...@patrickheinen.com wrote: I'm generating the STMap with (x+0.5)/width and (y+0.5/height). It doesn't seem to be off by a pixel, as everything but that one pixel line is spot on. As for filtering, I have a case where it shouldn't filter at all as pixels are getting mapped one to one. I attached an example script that shows the issue. Thanks for your help! On 03.08.2014, at 02:51, marlor.l...@gmail.com mailto:marlor.l...@gmail.com wrote: couldn't it be a filtering or multisample problem? I also had similar problems using STMap for tiling an image, and I ended up using UVTile On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Deke Kincaid d...@thefoundry.co.uk mailto:d...@thefoundry.co.uk wrote: How are you generating the STMap?It might be off by a pixel depending how you generated it. -- Deke Kincaid Creative Specialist The Foundry Skype: dekekincaid Tel: (310) 399 4555 tel:%28310%29%20399%204555 - Mobile: (310) 883 4313 Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/ Email: d...@thefoundry.co.uk mailto:d...@thefoundry.co.uk On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Patrick Heinen mailingli...@patrickheinen.com mailto:mailingli...@patrickheinen.com wrote: Hey everyone, I'm using an STMap where the original left and right edge of the image touch each other in the image center. When the filtering is set to cubic on the STMap I get a one pixel line at that edge, that I don't get if I ran through the transforms without an STMap. Switching the filtering to Impulse, the line disappears, but obviously everything else looks crappy. I checked the values of the STMap and the source and destination pixels seem to be correct. Has anyone had this problem before? Or has someone maybe an idea, what could cause this? Thanks and enjoy your weekend! Patrick ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk , http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk , http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk , http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk , http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] STMap produces line where right and left image edge join
Jep Howard, that's what I got. I now sent it to support and they said it's a
bug, logged as Bug 8655.
And for everyone to try at home ;):
set cut_paste_input [stack 0]
version 8.0 v3
CheckerBoard2 {
inputs 0
format 1024 1024 0 0 1024 1024 1 square_1K
name CheckerBoard4
selected true
xpos 10177
ypos -129
}
set N62265a0 [stack 0]
push $N62265a0
push $N62265a0
push $N62265a0
push $N62265a0
push $N62265a0
SphericalTransform {
inputs 6
input Cube
format 2048 1024 0 0 2048 1024 1 2k1k
fix true
name SphericalTransform7
selected true
xpos 10177
ypos -47
}
set Ncb640c0 [stack 0]
Expression {
expr0 (0.5+x)/width
expr1 (0.5+y)/height
expr2 0
expr3 1
name Expression1
selected true
xpos 10098
ypos 4
}
SphericalTransform {
input Lat Long map
ry 180
format 2048 1024 0 0 2048 1024 1 2k1k
fix true
name SphericalTransform21
selected true
xpos 10098
ypos 44
}
push $Ncb640c0
STMap {
inputs 2
uv rgb
name STMap3
selected true
xpos 10197
ypos 44
}
push $Ncb640c0
SphericalTransform {
input Lat Long map
ry 180
format 2048 1024 0 0 2048 1024 1 2k1k
fix true
name SphericalTransform22
selected true
xpos 10318
ypos 50
}
Merge2 {
inputs 2
operation difference
name Merge6
selected true
xpos 10282
ypos 118
}
Howard Jones wrote on 06.08.2014 15:14:
Make sure the centre of the uv map is 0.5 for each pixel not 0
Ie (x+0.5)/width, (y+0.5)/height I think
I have the right expression at work.
Howard
On 6 Aug 2014, at 08:12 pm, Patrick Heinen mailingli...@patrickheinen.com
wrote:
Hey Ryan,
the UV map I have is created in Nuke and even not filtering it doesn't get
rid
of that one line :(
And blurring only makes it worse in my case.
Appreciate your help though.
cheers,
Patrick
Ryan O'Phelan wrote on 04.08.2014 21:27:
When you render uv maps, don't filter or antialias them, and you will not
have edging issues. Adding bilateral or gaussian blur to everything but the
edges helps too.
Hope that helps.
R
On Aug 3, 2014 3:12 PM, Patrick Heinen mailingli...@patrickheinen.com
mailto:mailingli...@patrickheinen.com wrote:
I'm generating the STMap with (x+0.5)/width and (y+0.5/height). It doesn't
seem to be off by a pixel, as everything but that one pixel line is spot
on.
As for filtering, I have a case where it shouldn't filter at all as pixels
are getting mapped one to one. I attached an example script that shows the
issue.
Thanks for your help!
On 03.08.2014, at 02:51, marlor.l...@gmail.com
mailto:marlor.l...@gmail.com wrote:
couldn't it be a filtering or multisample problem?
I also had similar problems using STMap for tiling an image, and I ended
up
using UVTile
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Deke Kincaid d...@thefoundry.co.uk
mailto:d...@thefoundry.co.uk wrote:
How are you generating the STMap?It might be off by a pixel depending
how you generated it.
--
Deke Kincaid
Creative Specialist
The Foundry
Skype: dekekincaid
Tel: (310) 399 4555 tel:%28310%29%20399%204555 - Mobile: (310) 883
4313
Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/
Email: d...@thefoundry.co.uk mailto:d...@thefoundry.co.uk
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Patrick Heinen
mailingli...@patrickheinen.com mailto:mailingli...@patrickheinen.com
wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm using an STMap where the original left and right edge of the image
touch each other in the image center. When the filtering is set to cubic
on the STMap I get a one pixel line at that edge, that I don't get if I
ran through the transforms without an STMap. Switching the filtering to
Impulse, the line disappears, but obviously everything else looks
crappy.
I checked the values of the STMap and the source and destination pixels
seem to be correct.
Has anyone had this problem before? Or has someone maybe an idea, what
could cause this?
Thanks and enjoy your weekend!
Patrick
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk ,
http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk ,
http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk ,
http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] STMap produces line where right and left image edge join
Dialate ? Long long shot but better then blur for uv map. On Aug 6, 2014 3:12 PM, Patrick Heinen mailingli...@patrickheinen.com wrote: Hey Ryan, the UV map I have is created in Nuke and even not filtering it doesn't get rid of that one line :( And blurring only makes it worse in my case. Appreciate your help though. cheers, Patrick Ryan O'Phelan wrote on 04.08.2014 21:27: When you render uv maps, don't filter or antialias them, and you will not have edging issues. Adding bilateral or gaussian blur to everything but the edges helps too. Hope that helps. R On Aug 3, 2014 3:12 PM, Patrick Heinen mailingli...@patrickheinen.com mailto:mailingli...@patrickheinen.com wrote: I'm generating the STMap with (x+0.5)/width and (y+0.5/height). It doesn't seem to be off by a pixel, as everything but that one pixel line is spot on. As for filtering, I have a case where it shouldn't filter at all as pixels are getting mapped one to one. I attached an example script that shows the issue. Thanks for your help! On 03.08.2014, at 02:51, marlor.l...@gmail.com mailto: marlor.l...@gmail.com wrote: couldn't it be a filtering or multisample problem? I also had similar problems using STMap for tiling an image, and I ended up using UVTile On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Deke Kincaid d...@thefoundry.co.uk mailto:d...@thefoundry.co.uk wrote: How are you generating the STMap?It might be off by a pixel depending how you generated it. -- Deke Kincaid Creative Specialist The Foundry Skype: dekekincaid Tel: (310) 399 4555 tel:%28310%29%20399%204555 - Mobile: (310) 883 4313 Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/ Email: d...@thefoundry.co.uk mailto:d...@thefoundry.co.uk On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Patrick Heinen mailingli...@patrickheinen.com mailto:mailingli...@patrickheinen.com wrote: Hey everyone, I'm using an STMap where the original left and right edge of the image touch each other in the image center. When the filtering is set to cubic on the STMap I get a one pixel line at that edge, that I don't get if I ran through the transforms without an STMap. Switching the filtering to Impulse, the line disappears, but obviously everything else looks crappy. I checked the values of the STMap and the source and destination pixels seem to be correct. Has anyone had this problem before? Or has someone maybe an idea, what could cause this? Thanks and enjoy your weekend! Patrick ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk mailto: Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk , http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk mailto: Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk , http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk mailto: Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk , http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk mailto: Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk , http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users ___ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Re: [Nuke-users] add specular only
but I need to mask out the spec and pipe through the diffuse texture
On 05/08/14 20:30, Ron Ganbar wrote:
Just don't connect anything to the input of the Specular and you
should be fine.
Ron Ganbar
email: ron...@gmail.com mailto:ron...@gmail.com
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
+972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx fr...@ohufx.com
mailto:fr...@ohufx.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to figure out how to add a specular component to the
default shading behaviour, but every time I add a Specular shader,
the object gets self illuminated, even when the light is behind
the object.
The same is true for any kind of shader node.
When I don't use any shader I get the result I want (object is
black when the light is behind it). All I need is specular on top
of that.
What am I missing?
Cheers,
frank
set cut_paste_input [stack 0]
version 8.0 v5
Camera2 {
inputs 0
focal 45
haperture 90
vaperture 90
far 10
name Camera3
selected true
xpos 915
ypos -677
}
Light2 {
inputs 0
falloff_type Quadratic
translate {{curve x1 -1 x50 0.1060127839 x100 1} {curve x1 -1 x50
0.370048 x100 -1} {curve x1 -2 x50 -0.1226326749 x100 -2}}
depthmap_slope_bias 0.01
name Light2
selected true
xpos 921
ypos -819
}
push $cut_paste_input
Roto {
output alpha
replace true
curves {{{v x3f9a}
{f 0}
{n
{layer Root
{f 512}
{t 0}
{a}
{curvegroup Bezier1 512 bezier
{{cc
{f 8192}
{p
{x42d4 x433a}
{x43cf x44bdc000}
{xc2d4 xc33a}
{xc381 x4294}
{x440b8000 x438d}
{x4381 xc294}
{xc308 xc2fc}
{x44cac000 x433a}
{x4308 x42fc}
{x4200 xc36a}
{x44f94000 x44468000}
{xc200 x436a}
{x42cc xc316}
{x44f3c000 x44c34000}
{xc2cc x4316}
{x4352 xc240}
{x44c04000 x44f7c000}
{xc352 x4240}}}
{cc
{f 8192}
{p
{x42d4 x433a}
{}
{xc2d4 xc33a}
{xc381 x4294}
{}
{x4381 xc294}
{xc308 xc2fc}
{}
{x4308 x42fc}
{x4200 xc36a}
{}
{xc200 x436a}
{x42cc xc316}
{}
{xc2cc x4316}
{x4352 xc240}
{}
{xc352 x4240
{t x44a84000 x4483c000}
{a osw x4120 osf 0 str 1 spx x4480 spy x4480 sb 1
ltn x42a6 ltm x42a6 tt x4080}}
toolbox {selectAll {
{ selectAll str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 }
{ createBezier str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 tt 4 }
{ createBezierCusped str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createBSpline str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createEllipse str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createRectangle str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createRectangleCusped str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ brush str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ eraser src 2 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ clone src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ reveal src 3 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ dodge src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ burn src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ blur src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ sharpen src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ smear src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
} }
toolbar_brush_hardness 0.20003
toolbar_source_transform_scale {1 1}
toolbar_source_transform_center {1024 1024}
colorOverlay {0 0 0 0}
lifetime_type all frames
lifetime_start 83
lifetime_end 83
motionblur_shutter_offset_type centred
source_black_outside true
createNewTrack {{-1} -1\t(none)\t-1 1000\tNew Track Layer\t1000}
name Roto3
selected true
xpos 915
ypos -1752
}
CheckerBoard2 {
inputs 0
name CheckerBoard1
selected true
xpos 1073
ypos -1824
}
Copy {
inputs 2
from0 rgba.alpha
to0 rgba.alpha
bbox A
name Copy2
selected true
xpos 1073
ypos -1752
}
Premult {
name Premult2
selected true
xpos 1073
ypos -1641
}
set N55ec630 [stack 0]
Dot {
name Dot5
selected true
xpos 886
ypos -1637
}
Erode {
size 1
name Erode4
selected true
xpos 852
ypos -1587
}
Erode {
size 1
name Erode5
selected true
xpos 852
ypos -1549
}
Re: [Nuke-users] add specular only
Ah, using the secondary inputs is fine, just not the first pipe which is
meant to take the upstream texture or shader.
If I leave that unconnected and use MergeMat to plus the specular on top
of my texture instead I get what I wanted.
Cryptic...
Thanks!
frank
On 05/08/14 20:30, Ron Ganbar wrote:
Just don't connect anything to the input of the Specular and you
should be fine.
Ron Ganbar
email: ron...@gmail.com mailto:ron...@gmail.com
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
+972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx fr...@ohufx.com
mailto:fr...@ohufx.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to figure out how to add a specular component to the
default shading behaviour, but every time I add a Specular shader,
the object gets self illuminated, even when the light is behind
the object.
The same is true for any kind of shader node.
When I don't use any shader I get the result I want (object is
black when the light is behind it). All I need is specular on top
of that.
What am I missing?
Cheers,
frank
set cut_paste_input [stack 0]
version 8.0 v5
Camera2 {
inputs 0
focal 45
haperture 90
vaperture 90
far 10
name Camera3
selected true
xpos 915
ypos -677
}
Light2 {
inputs 0
falloff_type Quadratic
translate {{curve x1 -1 x50 0.1060127839 x100 1} {curve x1 -1 x50
0.370048 x100 -1} {curve x1 -2 x50 -0.1226326749 x100 -2}}
depthmap_slope_bias 0.01
name Light2
selected true
xpos 921
ypos -819
}
push $cut_paste_input
Roto {
output alpha
replace true
curves {{{v x3f9a}
{f 0}
{n
{layer Root
{f 512}
{t 0}
{a}
{curvegroup Bezier1 512 bezier
{{cc
{f 8192}
{p
{x42d4 x433a}
{x43cf x44bdc000}
{xc2d4 xc33a}
{xc381 x4294}
{x440b8000 x438d}
{x4381 xc294}
{xc308 xc2fc}
{x44cac000 x433a}
{x4308 x42fc}
{x4200 xc36a}
{x44f94000 x44468000}
{xc200 x436a}
{x42cc xc316}
{x44f3c000 x44c34000}
{xc2cc x4316}
{x4352 xc240}
{x44c04000 x44f7c000}
{xc352 x4240}}}
{cc
{f 8192}
{p
{x42d4 x433a}
{}
{xc2d4 xc33a}
{xc381 x4294}
{}
{x4381 xc294}
{xc308 xc2fc}
{}
{x4308 x42fc}
{x4200 xc36a}
{}
{xc200 x436a}
{x42cc xc316}
{}
{xc2cc x4316}
{x4352 xc240}
{}
{xc352 x4240
{t x44a84000 x4483c000}
{a osw x4120 osf 0 str 1 spx x4480 spy x4480 sb 1
ltn x42a6 ltm x42a6 tt x4080}}
toolbox {selectAll {
{ selectAll str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 }
{ createBezier str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 tt 4 }
{ createBezierCusped str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createBSpline str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createEllipse str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createRectangle str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createRectangleCusped str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ brush str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ eraser src 2 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ clone src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ reveal src 3 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ dodge src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ burn src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ blur src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ sharpen src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ smear src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
} }
toolbar_brush_hardness 0.20003
toolbar_source_transform_scale {1 1}
toolbar_source_transform_center {1024 1024}
colorOverlay {0 0 0 0}
lifetime_type all frames
lifetime_start 83
lifetime_end 83
motionblur_shutter_offset_type centred
source_black_outside true
createNewTrack {{-1} -1\t(none)\t-1 1000\tNew Track Layer\t1000}
name Roto3
selected true
xpos 915
ypos -1752
}
CheckerBoard2 {
inputs 0
name CheckerBoard1
selected true
xpos 1073
ypos -1824
}
Copy {
inputs 2
from0 rgba.alpha
to0 rgba.alpha
bbox A
name Copy2
selected true
xpos 1073
ypos -1752
}
Premult {
name Premult2
selected true
xpos 1073
ypos -1641
}
set N55ec630 [stack 0]
Dot {
name Dot5
selected true
xpos 886
ypos -1637
Re: [Nuke-users] add specular only
Spoke to soon. MergeMat produces artifacts like crazy, so back to plan B
(using two ScanelineRender nodes and mergeing speculat and diffuse in 2D
- booo).
On 07/08/14 15:41, Frank Rueter|OHUfx wrote:
Ah, using the secondary inputs is fine, just not the first pipe which
is meant to take the upstream texture or shader.
If I leave that unconnected and use MergeMat to plus the specular on
top of my texture instead I get what I wanted.
Cryptic...
Thanks!
frank
On 05/08/14 20:30, Ron Ganbar wrote:
Just don't connect anything to the input of the Specular and you
should be fine.
Ron Ganbar
email: ron...@gmail.com mailto:ron...@gmail.com
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
+972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx fr...@ohufx.com
mailto:fr...@ohufx.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to figure out how to add a specular component to the
default shading behaviour, but every time I add a Specular
shader, the object gets self illuminated, even when the light is
behind the object.
The same is true for any kind of shader node.
When I don't use any shader I get the result I want (object is
black when the light is behind it). All I need is specular on top
of that.
What am I missing?
Cheers,
frank
set cut_paste_input [stack 0]
version 8.0 v5
Camera2 {
inputs 0
focal 45
haperture 90
vaperture 90
far 10
name Camera3
selected true
xpos 915
ypos -677
}
Light2 {
inputs 0
falloff_type Quadratic
translate {{curve x1 -1 x50 0.1060127839 x100 1} {curve x1 -1
x50 0.370048 x100 -1} {curve x1 -2 x50 -0.1226326749 x100 -2}}
depthmap_slope_bias 0.01
name Light2
selected true
xpos 921
ypos -819
}
push $cut_paste_input
Roto {
output alpha
replace true
curves {{{v x3f9a}
{f 0}
{n
{layer Root
{f 512}
{t 0}
{a}
{curvegroup Bezier1 512 bezier
{{cc
{f 8192}
{p
{x42d4 x433a}
{x43cf x44bdc000}
{xc2d4 xc33a}
{xc381 x4294}
{x440b8000 x438d}
{x4381 xc294}
{xc308 xc2fc}
{x44cac000 x433a}
{x4308 x42fc}
{x4200 xc36a}
{x44f94000 x44468000}
{xc200 x436a}
{x42cc xc316}
{x44f3c000 x44c34000}
{xc2cc x4316}
{x4352 xc240}
{x44c04000 x44f7c000}
{xc352 x4240}}}
{cc
{f 8192}
{p
{x42d4 x433a}
{}
{xc2d4 xc33a}
{xc381 x4294}
{}
{x4381 xc294}
{xc308 xc2fc}
{}
{x4308 x42fc}
{x4200 xc36a}
{}
{xc200 x436a}
{x42cc xc316}
{}
{xc2cc x4316}
{x4352 xc240}
{}
{xc352 x4240
{t x44a84000 x4483c000}
{a osw x4120 osf 0 str 1 spx x4480 spy x4480 sb
1 ltn x42a6 ltm x42a6 tt x4080}}
toolbox {selectAll {
{ selectAll str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 }
{ createBezier str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 tt 4 }
{ createBezierCusped str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createBSpline str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createEllipse str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createRectangle str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ createRectangleCusped str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ brush str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ eraser src 2 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ clone src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ reveal src 3 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ dodge src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ burn src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ blur src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ sharpen src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
{ smear src 1 str 1 ssx 1 ssy 1 sf 1 sb 1 }
} }
toolbar_brush_hardness 0.20003
toolbar_source_transform_scale {1 1}
toolbar_source_transform_center {1024 1024}
colorOverlay {0 0 0 0}
lifetime_type all frames
lifetime_start 83
lifetime_end 83
motionblur_shutter_offset_type centred
source_black_outside true
createNewTrack {{-1} -1\t(none)\t-1 1000\tNew Track Layer\t1000}
name Roto3
selected true
xpos 915
ypos -1752
}
CheckerBoard2 {
inputs 0
name CheckerBoard1
selected true
xpos 1073
ypos -1824
}
Copy {
inputs 2
from0 rgba.alpha
to0 rgba.alpha
bbox A
name Copy2
selected true
xpos 1073
