[Numpy-discussion] CI: testing of musllinux

In https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/17630 we're seeing some issues (amongst others) with the scipy test suite that uses numpy==1.24.0 on musllinux. I was wondering if numpy would like to add a musllinux CI entry? This would help prepare for a musllinux wheel. I propose that something akin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:30 AM Stanley Seibert > wrote: > >> Another minor annoyance is that the link on the Github "Checks" page that >> says "View More Details on Azure Pipelines" takes you to a login page, >> which then forwards

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:30 AM Stanley Seibert wrote: > Another minor annoyance is that the link on the Github "Checks" page that > says "View More Details on Azure Pipelines" takes you to a login page, > which then forwards you to the public (no login required) pipeline build > results page.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Another minor annoyance is that the link on the Github "Checks" page that says "View More Details on Azure Pipelines" takes you to a login page, which then forwards you to the public (no login required) pipeline build results page. As a result, people might not realize you can view the build

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the security model here. The onboarding wizard makes it pretty easy to get started, but the UI afterwards has a lot of complexity for managing fine grained permissions. As I understand it, I made a "numba" project with my Microsoft account, but I can add

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Hi Allan, That's pretty cool -- I should follow-up on the CI part of it! Tyler On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 20:18, Allan Haldane wrote: > On 09/12/2018 08:14 PM, Tyler Reddy wrote: > > Would also be cool to have native ppc64 arch in CI, but I checked > > briefly with IBM and no such integration

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On 09/12/2018 08:14 PM, Tyler Reddy wrote: Would also be cool to have native ppc64 arch in CI, but I checked briefly with IBM and no such integration exists with github as far as the contact knew. Hi Tyler, ppc64 CI is available through OSUOSL. Earlier this year I requested a ppc64be test

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:30 PM Stanley Seibert wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM Stanley Seibert >> wrote: >> >>> If you go beyond the free tier, you can connect self-managed build >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:32 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM Stanley Seibert > wrote: > >> If you go beyond the free tier, you can connect self-managed build >> workers to the same system, but the build agent is written in C#, so I'm >> not sure how portable it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM Stanley Seibert wrote: > I just finished adding support to the Numba repo for Azure Pipelines: > > https://github.com/numba/numba/pull/3303 > > The "free for open source" tier is 10 concurrent jobs that can run up to > 60 minutes each (although the website says 30

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Also, if anyone is curious what the CI interface looks like for the results of a finished build, here's the Numba build from that PR: https://dev.azure.com/numba/numba/_build/results?buildId=34=logs On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Stanley Seibert wrote: > I just finished adding support to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

I just finished adding support to the Numba repo for Azure Pipelines: https://github.com/numba/numba/pull/3303 The "free for open source" tier is 10 concurrent jobs that can run up to 60 minutes each (although the website says 30 minutes), and no limit on minutes per month. Like the other CI

Re: [Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Could initially try just adding some "bonus" jobs (that are useful / nice, but we can't afford to add to current CI load) as a trial maybe, and if the free version or a deal / offer on better services proves more expedient than what we currently have then progressively migrate if / as appropriate.

[Numpy-discussion] CI Testing

Hi All, We might want to take a look at testing/building on AZURE . Probably worth exploring, although it is hard to find all information. IIRC, we got an offer from Microsoft along these lines a couple of years