> I'd be happy to tag someone at LGTM, but I don't know who that would be.
I've tagged @jhelie in the past with some success, although it's been a
while so they may no longer be employed there!
Eric
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 at 22:16, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 2:35 PM
On 15/8/21 12:15 am, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 2:35 PM Eric Wieser
mailto:wieser.eric%2bnu...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
This might be worth creating a github issue for simply so we can
tag someone working at LGTM; they've been helpful in the past, and
it's
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 2:35 PM Eric Wieser
wrote:
> This might be worth creating a github issue for simply so we can tag
> someone working at LGTM; they've been helpful in the past, and it's
> possible we just need to fiddle with some configuration to make it work.
>
> It's also worth noting
This might be worth creating a github issue for simply so we can tag
someone working at LGTM; they've been helpful in the past, and it's
possible we just need to fiddle with some configuration to make it work.
It's also worth noting that LGTM runs against C code too; so even if we
disable it for
Hi All,
LGTM on github uses Python 3.7, which causes a problem if we drop 3.7
support. LGTM is nice for pointing to possible code improvements, but we
mostly ignore it anyway. There are probably standalone code analysers that
would serve our needs as well, so dropping it seems the easiest way
Hi all!
Our next Documentation Team meeting will be tomorrow - *Monday, August 16*
at ***4PM UTC***.
All are welcome - you don't need to already be a contributor to join. If
you have questions or are curious about what we're doing, we'll be happy to
meet you!
If you wish to join on Zoom, use
