Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-14 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Indeed, we do something similar in astropy, with a pre-release failure
being considered breakage (rather than ignorable as for -dev):
https://github.com/astropy/astropy/blob/master/.travis.yml#L142
​-- Marten
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-14 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi Nathan,

One very helpful think you could do, is add a Travis-CI matrix entry
where you are testing against the latest numpy nightly builds.

I got a bit lost in your tox setup, but the basic idea is that, for
one test entry, you add the following flags to pip:

-f 
https://7933911d6844c6c53a7d-47bd50c35cd79bd838daf386af554a83.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com
--pre

In that case, you'll pull in the latest nightly build of Numpy.  See
the Scipy .travis.yml setup for an example.

Cheers,

Matthew

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Nathan Goldbaum  wrote:
> OK I guess I missed that announcement.
>
> I wouldn’t mind more than one email with a reminder to test.
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:42 PM Charles R Harris 
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Nathan Goldbaum 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chuck,
>>>
>>> Are you planning on doing an rc release this time? I think the NumPy 1.14
>>> release was unusually bumpy and part of that was the lack of an rc. One
>>> example: importing h5py caused a warning under numpy 1.14 and an h5py
>>> release didn’t come out with a workaround or fix for a couple months. There
>>> was also an issue with array printing that caused problems in yt (although
>>> both yt and NumPy quickly did bugfix releases that fixed that).
>>>
>>> I guess 1.14 was particularly noisy, but still I’d really appreciate
>>> having a prerelease version to test against and some time to report issues
>>> with the prerelease so numpy and other projects can implement workarounds as
>>> needed without doing a release that might potentially break real users who
>>> happen to install right after numpy 1.x.0 comes out.
>>
>>
>> There was a 1.14.0rc1. I was too quick for the full release, just waited
>> three weeks, so maybe four this time. Too few people actually test the
>> candidates and give feedback, so I tend to regard the *.*.0 releases as the
>> true rc :)
>>
>> Chuck
>> ___
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Nathan Goldbaum 
wrote:

> Hi Chuck,
>
> Are you planning on doing an rc release this time? I think the NumPy 1.14
> release was unusually bumpy and part of that was the lack of an rc. One
> example: importing h5py caused a warning under numpy 1.14 and an h5py
> release didn’t come out with a workaround or fix for a couple months. There
> was also an issue with array printing that caused problems in yt (although
> both yt and NumPy quickly did bugfix releases that fixed that).
>
> I guess 1.14 was particularly noisy, but still I’d really appreciate
> having a prerelease version to test against and some time to report issues
> with the prerelease so numpy and other projects can implement workarounds
> as needed without doing a release that might potentially break real users
> who happen to install right after numpy 1.x.0 comes out.
>

There was a 1.14.0rc1
. I was too quick
for the full release, just waited three weeks, so maybe four this time. Too
few people actually test the candidates and give feedback, so I tend to
regard the *.*.0 releases as the true rc :)

Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Request for a -rc seconded (although this time we should be fine for
astropy, as things are working well with -dev).
-- Marten
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


Re: [Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Nathan Goldbaum
Hi Chuck,

Are you planning on doing an rc release this time? I think the NumPy 1.14
release was unusually bumpy and part of that was the lack of an rc. One
example: importing h5py caused a warning under numpy 1.14 and an h5py
release didn’t come out with a workaround or fix for a couple months. There
was also an issue with array printing that caused problems in yt (although
both yt and NumPy quickly did bugfix releases that fixed that).

I guess 1.14 was particularly noisy, but still I’d really appreciate having
a prerelease version to test against and some time to report issues with
the prerelease so numpy and other projects can implement workarounds as
needed without doing a release that might potentially break real users who
happen to install right after numpy 1.x.0 comes out.

Best,
Nathan Goldbaum

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:11 PM Charles R Harris 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> There is a PR for the updated NumPy 1.15.0 release notes
>  . I would appreciate it if
> all those involved in the thatn release would have a look and fix incorrect
> or missing notes.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chuck
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


[Numpy-discussion] Updated 1.15.0 release notes

2018-06-13 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All,

There is a PR for the updated NumPy 1.15.0 release notes
 . I would appreciate it if all
those involved in the thatn release would have a look and fix incorrect or
missing notes.

Cheers,

Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion