as due to the many incompatiblities in 1.10 many will likely not be able
to update anytime soon, so I think putting out another 1.9.3 bugfix
release would be a good idea.
I can probably do the release management for it, though I haven't been
keeping up with bugfixes recently so, please comment
Hi,
I'm just building numpy 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 (just released).
In order to get the tests to pass on Python 3.5, I need to cherry pick
commit 7d6aa8c onto the 1.9.2 tag position.
Does anyone object to me uploading a wheel built from this patched
version to pypi as 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 on OSX?
[Tim, ping me if you want to get dropped from the reply chain, as we are
liable to get more into numpy decision-making. I've dropped python-ideas.]
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Robert Kern ]
> >> ...
> >> I'll also recommend
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 01:32:13 -0700
Matthew Brett wrote:
> >>
> >> Does anyone object to me uploading a wheel built from this patched
> >> version to pypi as 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 on OSX? It would help to get
> >> the ball rolling for Python 3.5 binary wheels.
> >
> > Why
I would like to add patches for the mingwpy windows build as well. There is
no Python-3.5 build so far.
Carlkl
2015-09-14 10:46 GMT+02:00 Robert Kern :
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just building numpy 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 (just released).
>
> In order to get the tests to pass on Python 3.5, I need to cherry pick
> commit 7d6aa8c onto the 1.9.2 tag position.
>
> Does anyone object
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:22 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm just building numpy 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 (just released).
>>
>> In order to get the tests to pass on Python
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:26:58 +0100
Robert Kern wrote:
>
> Actually, I meant all of the crap *around* it, the platform-compatibility
> testing to see if you have such a hardware instruction or not, and C++
> template shenanigans in the surrounding code. It's possible that
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:22 AM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Brett
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm just