Re: [Numpy-discussion] (no subject)

2016-04-27 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hi, Welcome! It would be a good exercise to look at the documentation and tutorial for Numpy at http://docs.scipy.org/doc/ Also the lectures at the lectures at www.scipy-lectures.org might be a interesting introduction to scientific python in numpy stack. Hope it helps. Happy learning !

[Numpy-discussion] Regarding taking up project ideas and GSoC 2015

2015-02-02 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hello everyone, I am a third year computer science undergraduate student, from BITS Pilani, India. First of all, I have cross posted to both the mailing lists, since there is a large overlap among contributors of the organisations. Please do mention if there is any objection to do so. I am

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Float view of complex array

2015-01-26 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hi Jens, I don't have enough knowledge about the internal memory layout, but the documentation ndarray.view http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.ndarray.view.html says that: Views that change the dtype size (bytes per entry) should normally be avoided on arrays defined by

Re: [Numpy-discussion] The future of ndarray.diagonal()

2015-01-15 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hello everyone, I just wanted to highlight the point made by Charles, it would be great if he would clarify any mistakes in the points that I put forward. Quoting the documentation, In versions of NumPy prior to 1.7, this function always returned a new,independent array containing a copy of the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] edge-cases of ellipsis indexing

2015-01-05 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hi Anthony, I am not sure whether the following section in documentation is relevant to the behavior you were referring to. When an ellipsis (...) is present but has no size (i.e. replaces zero :) the result will still always be an array. A view if no advanced index is present, otherwise a copy.

[Numpy-discussion] Regarding np.ma.masked_equal behavior

2015-01-03 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hello friends, This is an issue related to the working of *masked_equal* method. I was thinking if anyone related to an old ticket #1851 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/1851, regarding the modification of *masked_equal *function effect on *fill_value *could clarify the situation, since

[Numpy-discussion] Clarifications in numpy.ma module

2014-12-30 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hi all, I have recently been trying out various functions in masked array module of numpy. I have got confused at a places in the *core.py *of *ma *module. 1. In the *masked_equal *method, the docstring doesn't suggest that the *fill_value *gets updated by the *value *parameter of the function,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarifications in numpy.ma module

2014-12-30 Thread Maniteja Nandana
: RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in true_divide ret, rcount, out=ret, casting='unsafe', subok=False) masked_array(data = nan, mask = False, fill_value = 1e+20) Thanks , Maniteja. On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Maniteja Nandana maniteja.modesty...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarifications in numpy.ma module

2014-12-30 Thread Maniteja Nandana
I was just referring to the exception raised in the case where the length of the array is zero. I have not thought if the example provided by @Alexander. I was also wondering if the automatic masking of NaN should be done or not, which is why I asked about the difference in the operating named

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Clarifications in numpy.ma module

2014-12-30 Thread Maniteja Nandana
On 31-Dec-2014 4:53 am, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote: exception? Did you mean warning? If warning, I recall some discussion recently to figure out a way to hide that, but only for masked values (I would want to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Guidance regarding build and testing

2014-12-27 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hello guys, I have filed a pull request 5386, which is my first one. It would be great if someone would lookup at the issue, and suggest any further changes. Waiting in anticipation, Maniteja. ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Guidance regarding build and testing

2014-12-22 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hello everyone, I have tried to solve Issue #5354 in a branch. Now if I try to compare my branch with numpy master, there were some auto generated files in my branch. I have created a pull request #5385 for this, please do suggest if there needs to be any changes in the pull request and the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Guidance regarding build and testing

2014-12-22 Thread Maniteja Nandana
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Maniteja Nandana maniteja.modesty...@gmail.com wrote: I have tried to solve Issue #5354 in a branch. Now if I try to compare my branch with numpy master, there were some auto

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Guidance regarding build and testing

2014-12-22 Thread Maniteja Nandana
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Maniteja Nandana maniteja.modesty...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Maniteja Nandana maniteja.modesty...@gmail.com wrote: I have tried to solve Issue #5354

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Guidance regarding build and testing

2014-12-22 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hi everyone, Sorry for the empty message accidently sent before. I have checked the travis build for the pull request. I have no idea what failure on 'USE WHEEL = 1' option means. It would be great if someone could tell whether this result means the correction in the file caused the build to break

[Numpy-discussion] Guidance regarding build and testing

2014-12-21 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hello everyone, I am a novice in open source. I needed a small guidance in creating a local build of a repository. I was trying to make simple changes in a cloned copy of numpy ( here it was numpy/numoy/ma/core.py ). If I need to see the effect of these changes in actual working, are there any

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Guidance regarding build and testing

2014-12-21 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hello Ralf, On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Maniteja, On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Maniteja Nanda You don't need a virtualenv. If you want to only run the tests and make sure your changes pass the test suite, the easiest option is ``python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Guidance regarding build and testing

2014-12-21 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hello Ralf, Thanks for the help. Now I am able to see the modifications in the interpreter. As I was going through broadcasting and slicing, I was eager to try out different modifications to understand the working. On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Guidance to start contribution to Numpy

2014-11-03 Thread Maniteja Nandana
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion-discussion http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion Hi Maniteja, On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Maniteja Nandana maniteja.modesty...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I'm a third year undergraduate student in Computer Science

[Numpy-discussion] Guidance to start contribution to Numpy

2014-11-02 Thread Maniteja Nandana
Hi everyone, I'm a third year undergraduate student in Computer Science. I have worked in Python libraries for past two years and am interested in getting some open source experience in Numpy and it would be great if anyone could suggest some bugs or issues that are suitable for a beginner to try