Hi All,
I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC 2009 as it could have. I
think this was mostly due to lack of preparation on our part, we weren't
ready when the students started showing up on the lists. So I would like to
put together a selection of suitable projects and corresponding
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC 2009 as it could have. I
think this was mostly due to lack of preparation on our part, we weren't
ready when the students started showing up on the
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC 2009 as it could have.
I
think this was mostly due to lack of preparation on our
On 21-Oct-09, at 3:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
• Best of breed special functions in cython. These could be part of
a separate numpy extras package where code is restricted to C,
Cython, and Python.
I think a lot of SciPy could be usefully brought over to Cython, as
well (not
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't feel that numpy/scipy did as well in GSOC 2009 as it could have.
I'd be curious to hear why you felt that numpy/scipy didn't do as well
this year. We had more projects than any other year and I think
On 10/21/2009 3:23 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
What exactly *was* the history of that project and what can we learn
from it?
Imo, what really drove this project forward, is that Skipper
was able to interact regularly with someone else who was actively
using and developing on the code base
