Hi,
Could someone remind me of the current state of numpy with regards to
honoring KeyboardInterrupts !?
I think KeyboardInterrupt is the exception that would have to be used
to do this kind of thing - right !? E.g. by pressing Ctrl-C
Another question, and not quite numpy specific, is how to
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Sebastian Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another question, and not quite numpy specific, is how to generate
this exception from another thread -- effectively injecting it into
the calling stack !? I ask this, because I'm using wxPython, which
makes things
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Andrew Dalke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 2008, at 12:00 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
There is some inconsistency though, for example one can override A() +
A(), but one cannot override 1 + 1. This could (should) be fixed
somehow.
That will never, ever
Stéfan,
Again, thanks to you and Thomas.
cheers,
Barry
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/12 Barry Wark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefan,
I'm sorry I dropped the ball on this one. I didn't have time to get
things working again before I left town
Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 21:55, Anne Archibald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/17 Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I suggested that we move it to a branch for the time being so we
can
play with it and come up with
Charles R Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]...
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Stéfan van der Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
2008/8/17 Robert Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I suggested that we move it to a branch for the time being so we can
play with it and come up
this should definitely be in the Numpy for Matlab users
page, http://www.scipy.org/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users, right
after the line:
Matlab Numpy Notes
Good form is to make that change yourself when you get
useful advice. But I did it this time.
Cheers,
Alan Isaac
The good news is that the patch just uses of the existing code to deal with
all the tricky issues (this is why the patch is so short). By the way, sort
could be implemented with the proposed specifications, its signature would be
(i)-(i). I agree that it would be nice if that code could
David Cournapeau wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:59 PM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm slowly coming to the conviction that there should be no C-ABI changes in
1.2.
It does not make
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:21 PM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:59 PM, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Charles R Harris
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The good news is that the patch just uses of the existing code to deal
with all the tricky issues (this is why the patch is so short). By the way,
sort could be implemented with the proposed specifications, its
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Charles R Harris wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:21 PM, David Cournapeau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:59 PM, David Cournapeau
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 22:03 -0700, Fernando Perez wrote:
Hi all,
[ please keep all replies to this only on the numpy list. I'm cc'ing
the scipy ones to make others aware of the topic, but do NOT reply on
those lists so we can have an organized thread for future reference]
In the
Andrew Dalke:
Any chance of someone reviewing my suggestions for
making the import somewhat faster still?
http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/874
Travis E. Oliphant:
In sum: I think 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 can be done immediately. 1) and
4) could be O.K. but 1) does break code and 4
Hi,
with Andrew's permission, I am starting a new thread, where our
discussion is ontopic. :)
My original question was, that I would like to override 1+1 to return
MyClass(1, 1) or something.
Robert said it would break other libraries and Andrew said this:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:23 PM,
Andrew Dalke wrote:
Andrew Dalke:
Any chance of someone reviewing my suggestions for
making the import somewhat faster still?
http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/874
Travis E. Oliphant:
In sum: I think 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 can be done immediately. 1) and
4) could be
On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
with Andrew permission, I am starting a new thread, where our
discussion is ontopic. :)
Though I want to point out that without specific proposals
of how the implementation might look, this thread will
not go anywhere as it will be too distant
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Andrew Dalke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
with Andrew permission, I am starting a new thread, where our
discussion is ontopic. :)
Though I want to point out that without specific proposals
of how the
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Ok, in the current state, you don't know either what's going to
happen. If you write
In [1]: x/2*3/4
you have no idea what the result is going to be, you need to analyze
x.__div__() and start from there. But if you write
In [2]: 1/2*3/4
currently you know it
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Ok, in the current state, you don't know either what's going to
happen. If you write
In [1]: x/2*3/4
you have no idea what the result is going to be, you need to analyze
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 15:04, Travis E. Oliphant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I say go ahead including changing #1 and #4. Let's leave 5 for the moment.
I think we can just delete all of the test() and bench() functions
except for numpy.{bench,test}(). That way, there is no code
duplication.
--
On Aug 18, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Example syntax (rough idea):
type(1.0)
type 'float'
with float as from decimal import Decimal
type(1.0)
class 'decimal.Decimal'
When would this with float ... considered valid?
For example, could I define things before asking
for a
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:21, Charles R Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Hochberg proposed using the call operator for matrix multiplication,
i.e.,
A(B(C))
Which has the advantage of using an existing operator. It looks like
function composition, which isn't that far off the mark if
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Ok, in the current state, you don't know either what's going to
happen. If you write
In [1]: x/2*3/4
you have no idea what the result is going to be, you
Andrew Dalke wrote:
When would this with float ... considered valid?
[long posting]
Oh h... what have I done ... *g*
Slow down, please. For now there are no concrete plans what-so-ever to
implement the feature in the near future. Some developers have expressed
their interest in a way to
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Dalke wrote:
When would this with float ... considered valid?
[long posting]
Oh h... what have I done ... *g*
Slow down, please. For now there are no concrete plans what-so-ever to
implement the feature in
2008/8/18 Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I say go ahead including changing #1 and #4. Let's leave 5 for the moment.
I ran several benchmarks and made sure that these imports take a
minimal amount of time. Wouldn't we want users to have access with
the doc framework without doing
On Aug 19, 2008, at 1:06 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
[long posting]
Oh h... what have I done ... *g*
*shrug* I write long emails. I've been told that
by several people. It's probably a bad thing.
The ideas needs a good PEP. You are definitely up to something. You
also
came up with a
Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
2008/8/18 Travis E. Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I say go ahead including changing #1 and #4. Let's leave 5 for the moment.
I ran several benchmarks and made sure that these imports take a
minimal amount of time. Wouldn't we want users to have access with
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:57:20AM +0200, Andrew Dalke wrote:
BTW, it's *fun* to modify an existing language and
afterwards it you know a secret - that programming
languages are just flimsy facades held together by
a shared hallucination. Like in a dream, change
things too much or leave
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 04:28:55PM -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote:
That said, what kind of problems do you have in mind?
A lot of software still don't deal well with unicode (wxPython's unicode
situation under windows, for instance, in interesting). But wht I am
most worried about is not being able
On Aug 18, 2008, at 6:57 PM, Andrew Dalke wrote:
...
BTW, it's *fun* to modify an existing language and
afterwards it you know a secret - that programming
languages are just flimsy facades held together by
a shared hallucination. Like in a dream, change
things too much or leave gaps and
2008/8/18 Andrew Dalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How do users know that those are present? How do users
view those docs? You're the one who added that directory, yes?,
so you've probably got the most experience with it. I
couldn't figure out it, and the README in the doc/ directory
wasn't
2008/8/18 Gael Varoquaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I actually think PEP 225 is pretty good. I have not big opinion about ~
vs @.
Both of these already have meanings (boolean not and decorator),
so it's pretty much a toss-up for me. In a way, the concept of a
decorator could still apply:
@* takes the
34 matches
Mail list logo
