Re: [Numpy-discussion] OK to upload patched 1.9.2 for Python 3.5?

as due to the many incompatiblities in 1.10 many will likely not be able to update anytime soon, so I think putting out another 1.9.3 bugfix release would be a good idea. I can probably do the release management for it, though I haven't been keeping up with bugfixes recently so, please comment

[Numpy-discussion] OK to upload patched 1.9.2 for Python 3.5?

Hi, I'm just building numpy 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 (just released). In order to get the tests to pass on Python 3.5, I need to cherry pick commit 7d6aa8c onto the 1.9.2 tag position. Does anyone object to me uploading a wheel built from this patched version to pypi as 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 on OSX?

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [Python-ideas] Should our default random number generator be secure?

[Tim, ping me if you want to get dropped from the reply chain, as we are liable to get more into numpy decision-making. I've dropped python-ideas.] On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Tim Peters wrote: > > [Robert Kern ] > >> ... > >> I'll also recommend

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OK to upload patched 1.9.2 for Python 3.5?

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 01:32:13 -0700 Matthew Brett wrote: > >> > >> Does anyone object to me uploading a wheel built from this patched > >> version to pypi as 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 on OSX? It would help to get > >> the ball rolling for Python 3.5 binary wheels. > > > > Why

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OK to upload patched 1.9.2 for Python 3.5?

I would like to add patches for the mingwpy windows build as well. There is no Python-3.5 build so far. Carlkl 2015-09-14 10:46 GMT+02:00 Robert Kern : > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Sep 14,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OK to upload patched 1.9.2 for Python 3.5?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just building numpy 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 (just released). > > In order to get the tests to pass on Python 3.5, I need to cherry pick > commit 7d6aa8c onto the 1.9.2 tag position. > > Does anyone object

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OK to upload patched 1.9.2 for Python 3.5?

Hi, On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:22 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm just building numpy 1.9.2 for Python 3.5 (just released). >> >> In order to get the tests to pass on Python

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [Python-ideas] Should our default random number generator be secure?

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:26:58 +0100 Robert Kern wrote: > > Actually, I meant all of the crap *around* it, the platform-compatibility > testing to see if you have such a hardware instruction or not, and C++ > template shenanigans in the surrounding code. It's possible that

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OK to upload patched 1.9.2 for Python 3.5?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Matthew Brett wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:22 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm just