On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.comwrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 4:49 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
Travis: do you already have a place on the NumPy Development
Wikihttp://wiki.numpy.org/where you're (b)logging your design decisions?
Seems like a good way
I'm a potential user of the C-API and therefore I'm very interested in
the outcome.
In the previous discussion
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/37409)
many different views on what the new C-API should be were expressed.
Naturally, I wonder if the new C-API will be
Wed, 26 May 2010 06:57:27 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
[clip: doxygen]
It is yet another format to use inside C sources (I don't think doxygen
supports rest), and I would rather have something that is similar,
ideally integrated into sphinx. It also generates rather ugly doc by
default,
Wed, 26 May 2010 10:50:19 +0200, Sebastian Walter wrote:
I'm a potential user of the C-API and therefore I'm very interested in
the outcome.
In the previous discussion
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/37409) many
different views on what the new C-API should be were
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Wed, 26 May 2010 10:50:19 +0200, Sebastian Walter wrote:
I'm a potential user of the C-API and therefore I'm very interested in
the outcome.
In the previous discussion
Hi,
I want to read binary data from a file using fromfile. This works as
long as I use a file name as argument to fromfile. With a file object
the data is wrong!
Consider the following example:
from numpy import *
fname='file.bin'
fname2='file2.bin'
a = arange(1, 30)
print type(a[0])
print
ke, 2010-05-26 kello 14:07 +0200, Christoph Bersch kirjoitti:
f = open(fname2, 'w')
[clip]
Am I doing something substantially wrong or is this a bug?
You are opening files in text mode. Use mode 'wb' instead.
--
Pauli Virtanen
___
NumPy-Discussion
Pauli Virtanen schrieb:
ke, 2010-05-26 kello 14:07 +0200, Christoph Bersch kirjoitti:
f = open(fname2, 'w')
[clip]
Am I doing something substantially wrong or is this a bug?
You are opening files in text mode. Use mode 'wb' instead.
That was it, thank you!
Linux does not seem to care about
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
Seems like a bug to me. Certain branches in _array_richcompare return
False to fail rather than Py_NotImplemented, which means the
string-understanding comparison fallbacks don't run. Attached is a (simple)
patch
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Wed, 26 May 2010 06:57:27 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
[clip: doxygen]
It is yet another format to use inside C sources (I don't think doxygen
supports rest), and I would rather have something that is similar,
ideally
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
Seems like a bug to me. Certain branches in _array_richcompare return
False to fail rather than Py_NotImplemented, which means the
Hi,
i try to implement a real-time convolution module refreshed by head
listener location (angle from a reference point).The result of the
convolution by binaural flters(HRTFs) allows me to spatialize a monophonic
wavfile. I got trouble with this as long as my convolution doesnt seem to
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Padma TAN ta...@gis.a-star.edu.sg wrote:
Hi,
Can I just install numpy and scipy without ATLAS? And what does this means
gnu: no Fortran 90 compiler found?
Yes you can install without ATLAS. And BLAS and LAPACK were found so you
should be fine. Did you
On May 25, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Tony S Yu tsy...@gmail.com wrote:
I got bit again by this bug with unsigned integers. (My original changes got
overwritten when I updated from svn and, unfortunately, merged conflicts
without
Wed, 26 May 2010 07:15:08 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Wed, 26 May 2010 06:57:27 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: [clip:
doxygen]
It is yet another format to use inside C sources (I don't think
doxygen supports rest), and
Greetings,
Google provides a product called App Engine. The description from
their site follows,
Google App Engine enables you to build and host web apps on the same
systems that power Google applications.
App Engine offers fast development and deployment; simple
administration, with no need to
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Gael Varoquaux
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:33:09PM -0700, Brent Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Gael Varoquaux
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org wrote:
Memmapped arrays don't pickle right. I know that to get
Christopher Hanley wrote:
Greetings,
Google provides a product called App Engine. The description from
their site follows,
Google App Engine enables you to build and host web apps on the same
systems that power Google applications.
App Engine offers fast development and deployment;
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:19, Christopher Hanley chan...@stsci.edu wrote:
Greetings,
Google provides a product called App Engine. The description from
their site follows,
Google App Engine enables you to build and
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
Christopher Hanley wrote:
Greetings,
Google provides a product called App Engine. The description from
their site follows,
Google App Engine enables you to build and host web apps on the same
systems
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:19, Christopher Hanley chan...@stsci.edu wrote:
Greetings,
Google provides a product called App Engine. The description from
their site follows,
Google App Engine enables you to build and host web apps on the same
systems that power Google applications.
App
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Christopher Hanley chan...@stsci.eduwrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
Christopher Hanley wrote:
Greetings,
Google provides a product called App Engine. The description from
their site
2010/5/25 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
Awesome! Since github now supports SVN interaction, and all the core
devs use Git, now might be a good time to move the entire numpy source
tree? It will certainly make it easier to merge the refactor changes!
I would love to move numpy to
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jarrod Millman mill...@berkeley.eduwrote:
2010/5/25 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
Awesome! Since github now supports SVN interaction, and all the core
devs use Git, now might be a good time to move the entire numpy source
tree? It will certainly
And in 2.0.0.dev8437.
More hints:
Assume has shape (N, Da) and b has shape (N, Db)
* There is a problem wben N = 1, Db=1 and Da 1.
* There is no problem when N = 1, Da=1 and Db 1.
* The first row is OK, but for all others, there is one error per row,
appearing in first column, then
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jarrod Millman mill...@berkeley.eduwrote:
2010/5/25 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
Awesome! Since github now supports SVN interaction, and all the core
devs use
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Jarrod Millman mill...@berkeley.edu
wrote:
2010/5/25 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
Awesome! Since github now supports SVN interaction, and all the core
devs use
Hello,
I changed the subject line for this thread, since I didn't want to
hijack another thread. Anyway, I am not proposing that we actually
decide whether to move to git and github now, but I am just curious
how people would feel. We had a conversation about this a few years
ago and it was
On May 26, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Sebastian Walter wrote:
I'm a potential user of the C-API and therefore I'm very interested in
the outcome.
In the previous discussion
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/37409)
many different views on what the new C-API should be were
On May 26, 2010, at 5:31 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
Wed, 26 May 2010 10:50:19 +0200, Sebastian Walter wrote:
I'm a potential user of the C-API and therefore I'm very interested
in
the outcome.
In the previous discussion
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/37409)
On May 26, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Sebastian Walter wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote:
Wed, 26 May 2010 10:50:19 +0200, Sebastian Walter wrote:
I'm a potential user of the C-API and therefore I'm very
interested in
the outcome.
In the previous discussion
On May 26, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote:
Hello,
I changed the subject line for this thread, since I didn't want to
hijack another thread. Anyway, I am not proposing that we actually
decide whether to move to git and github now, but I am just curious
how people would feel. We had a
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
I think we are ready for such a move. Someone should think about the
implications, though (with Trac integration, check-in mailings, etc.) and
make sure we get something we all like. Somebody probably has
Hi,
I think the main problem has been windows compatibility. Git is best from
the command line whereas the windows command line is an afterthought.
Another box that needs a check-mark is the buildbot. If svn clients are
supported then it may be that neither of those are going to be a problem.
On 26 May 2010 16:12, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
I changed the subject line for this thread, since I didn't want to
hijack another thread. Anyway, I am not proposing that we actually
decide whether to move to git and github now, but I am just curious
how people would feel.
Ping?
On 5/13/2010 6:34 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
Ok, let's try sending this message again, since it looks like I can't
send from gmane...
(See discussion on python-list at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.general/661328 for context)
numpy.zeros_like contains the following code:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think the main problem has been windows compatibility. Git is best from
the command line whereas the windows command line is an afterthought.
Another box that needs a check-mark is the buildbot. If svn clients
Hi,
there is no such thing as a nice bash shell for a windows user.
I have no idea how to use one.
It is a nice bash shell. You may not want a nice bash shell ;)
I can't imagine you'd object to one though. It's just a useful place
to type git commands, with file / directory path
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:25 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think the main problem has been windows compatibility. Git is best
from
the command line whereas the windows command line is an afterthought.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
there is no such thing as a nice bash shell for a windows user.
I have no idea how to use one.
It is a nice bash shell. You may not want a nice bash shell ;)
I can't imagine you'd object to one though.
2010/5/26 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
On 26 May 2010 16:12, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
I changed the subject line for this thread, since I didn't want to
hijack another thread. Anyway, I am not proposing that we actually
decide whether to move to git and github
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
there is no such thing as a nice bash shell for a windows user.
I have no idea how to use one.
It is a nice bash shell.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bruce Southey bsout...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/5/26 Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
On 26 May 2010 16:12, Travis Oliphant oliph...@enthought.com wrote:
I changed the subject line for this thread, since I didn't want to
hijack another thread. Anyway, I am
Hi Jarrod,
I'm in favour of the switch, though I don't use Windows. I find git
far more convenient to use than SVN; I've been using git-svn, and in
spite of the headaches it's caused me I still prefer it to raw SVN.
It seems to me that git's flexibility in how people collaborate means
we can do
I wouldn't call myself a developer, but I have been wanting to contribute
recently. I learned source control with svn, so I am much more comfortable
with it. My one attempt at using git for a personal project ended in
failure.
Then I discovered this guide, Git-SVN Crash Course:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
there is no such thing as a nice bash shell for a windows user.
I have no idea how to use one.
It is a nice bash shell.
Hi,
Any shell on windows is a pain, if only because of the spaces in the
filenames.
When I'm using git, or bzr or svn I use the windows shell which I'm
very familiar with ,and allows standard copy-paste and has quotes.
But since, I think, there are no numpy developers on Windows, and I'm
Hi,
It seems to me that git's flexibility in how people collaborate means
we can do a certain amount of figuring out after the switch.
This is very well said and true to our recent experience with nipy and ipython:
http://github.com/ipython/ipython
http://github.com/nipy/nipy
My
experience
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Heh. Can you to try the svn interface to github using your favorite svn ap.
I suppose we need to set up a test account there. Is it possible to have a
multiple user git account on github, or is it all push and
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the model we've gone for in nipy and ipython too. We wrote it
up in a workflow doc project. Here are the example docs giving the
git workflow for ipython:
https://cirl.berkeley.edu/mb312/gitwash/
and in
How do I determine if an array's (or column in a structured array) dtype is
a number or a string. I see how to determine the actual dtype but all I want
to know is if it is a string or a number.
*Vincent Davis
720-301-3003 *
vinc...@vincentdavis.net
my blog http://vincentdavis.net |
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
there is no such thing as a nice bash shell for
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Jarrod Millman mill...@berkeley.eduwrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's the model we've gone for in nipy and ipython too. We wrote it
up in a workflow doc project. Here are the example docs giving the
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
I wouldn't call myself a developer, but I have been wanting to contribute
recently. I learned source control with svn, so I am much more comfortable
with it. My one attempt at using git for a personal project ended in
On 27 May 2010 01:22, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Jarrod Millman mill...@berkeley.edu
wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's the model we've gone for in nipy and ipython too. We
Hi,
Linux has Linus, ipython has Fernando, nipy has... well, I'm sure it is
somebody. Numpy and Scipy no longer have a central figure and I like it that
way. There is no reason that DVCS has to inevitably lead to a central
authority.
I think I was trying to say that the way it looks as if it
On 27 May 2010 01:55, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Linux has Linus, ipython has Fernando, nipy has... well, I'm sure it is
somebody. Numpy and Scipy no longer have a central figure and I like it that
way. There is no reason that DVCS has to inevitably lead to a central
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Anne Archibald aarch...@physics.mcgill.ca
wrote:
On 27 May 2010 01:55, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Linux has Linus, ipython has Fernando, nipy has... well, I'm sure it is
somebody. Numpy and Scipy no longer have a central figure and
On 05/27/2010 02:16 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Anne Archibald
aarch...@physics.mcgill.ca mailto:aarch...@physics.mcgill.ca wrote:
On 27 May 2010 01:55, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
mailto:matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
No, at this point we don't have a release manager, we haven't since 1.2. We
have people who do the builds and put them up on sourceforge, but they
aren't release managers, they don't decide what is in the release or
organise the effort. We haven't had a central figure since Travis got a
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:28 PM, David da...@silveregg.co.jp wrote:
On 05/27/2010 02:16 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Anne Archibald
aarch...@physics.mcgill.ca mailto:aarch...@physics.mcgill.ca wrote:
On 27 May 2010 01:55, Matthew Brett
On 05/27/2010 02:34 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
An automatic gatekeeper is pretty much a
central repository, as I was suggesting.
I don't understand how centraly repository comes into this discussion -
nobody has been arguing against it. The question is whether we would
continue to push
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
No, at this point we don't have a release manager, we haven't since 1.2.
We
have people who do the builds and put them up on sourceforge, but they
aren't release managers, they don't decide what is in the
Hi,
No, I am saying we need at least five people who can commit to the main
repo. That is the central repository model.
Excellent - yes - that's reasonable. Then if you also agree to this:
No development in the main repo. Merges only.
then we're all in full agreement.
Review is fine,
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
No, I am saying we need at least five people who can commit to the main
repo. That is the central repository model.
Excellent - yes - that's reasonable. Then if you also agree to this:
No development in
65 matches
Mail list logo
