Re: [Numpy-discussion] assert_almost_equal bug?

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Keith Goodman wrote: > assert_almost_equal() and assert_array_almost_equal() raise a > ValueError instead of an AssertionError when the array contains > np.inf: That's a bug, is fixed in 45269ee1. assert_array_compare was checking for nans but not for infs. Chee

[Numpy-discussion] memory layout, K vs C order (was: Numpy 1.6 schedule)

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > > Ufuncs don't necessarily return arrays in C-order, but instead > try to keep the memory layout of the original if it seems > advantageous vs. memory access. > > Before: > np.sin(np.zeros((5,5,5)).transpose(1,2,0)).strides > (200, 40, 8

[Numpy-discussion] Structured array copying by field name (was: Numpy 1.6 schedule)

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > > Structured array copying copies by field name. > > Commit 22d96096bf7d5fb199ca80f2fcd04e8d27815476 > > Before: > x = np.array([(0, 1)], dtype=[('a', int), ('b', int)]) y = np.array([(2, 3)], dtype=[('a', int), ('b', int)]) y

[Numpy-discussion] broadcasting behavior for 1.6 (was: Numpy 1.6 schedule)

I'm just going through the very long 1.6 schedule thread to see what is still on the TODO list before a 1.6.x branch can be made. So I'll send a few separate mails, one for each topic. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Francesc Alted wrote: > A Sunday 06 March 2011 06:47:34 Mark Wiebe escrigué: >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C API freeze and review

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In pre

[Numpy-discussion] Intel C Compiler users: please test

Hi, In commit dede2691 I've committed a change to the 32-bit Intel C compiler (adding -fPIC) and added a 64-bit "intelem" compiler. Please test, if there's any issue the 32-bit flag change can be reverted. Thanks, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for a bit more info on structured arrays in the "basics" page

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I filed #1758. >>>>> >>>>>

[Numpy-discussion] C API freeze and review

Hi all, In preparation for making a 1.6.x branch, I just updated the C API version. Please do not add any more functions before the branch is created. Over 70 new functions and types were added, we should also review if all those are necessary and if they are documented. Below is a list of all ne

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for a bit more info on structured arrays in the "basics" page

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Skipper Seabold wrote: >>>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Inaccuracy in documentation of np.linalg.pinv

Hi Hao, On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Hao Xiong wrote: > I think the documentation for np.linalg.pinv contains some inaccuracies. Thanks for your comments. Are you interested to make some improvements yourself? It's quite easy to do on the numpy doc wiki: http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [ANN] Bento 0.0.5, a packaging solution for python software

Hi David, On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:07 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > Hi, > >    I am pleased to announce a new release of bento, a packaging > solution for > python which aims at reproducibility, extensibility and simplicity. Looks great! Out of curiosity, do you have a timeline in mind for add

Re: [Numpy-discussion] deprecations for 1.6; assert_almost_equal

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:39:20 -0500, josef.pktd wrote: Doc update committed in f527b49a. >> Why does assert_allclose have atol=0, while np.allclose has rtol=1.e-5, >> atol=1.e-8 ? > > Probably no reason, it should be fixed. I'm guessing that w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] problems w/ fortran compiler when compiling 1.5.1 on RHEL5

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:18 AM, John Cartwright wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm trying to compile 1.5.1 on a RHEL5 system and I'm specifying: > >  python setup.py config_fc --fcompiler=gnu95 build > > when doing the build. I see the message "Found executable /usr/bin/gfortran" > - so far so good.  Ho

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for a bit more info on structured arrays in the "basics" page

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote: >>> The page <http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/basics.rec.html> >>> >>> g

[Numpy-discussion] deprecations for 1.6; assert_almost_equal

Hi, I went through the current deprecations, and removed a number of things that have been deprecated for a long time, see https://github.com/rgommers/numpy/commits/deprecations-1.6. I'll commit that unless anyone objects. If anyone has new deprecations they want to put in for 1.6, discussing the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for a bit more info on structured arrays in the "basics" page

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > The page > > gives a good introduction to structured arrays. However, it says nothing > about how to set a particular element (all fields at once) from a > collection of data. > > For in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule (was: Numpy 2.0 schedule)

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Christoph Gohlke >>> wrote: Most packages don't have any apparent problems

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule (was: Numpy 2.0 schedule)

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 3/4/2011 1:00 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > I tested the 32 and 64 bit msvc9/MKL builds for Python 2.7 and 3.2. > There are few test failures (listed below) that look familiar. > > I also ran tests and/or examples of a few 3rd part

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule (was: Numpy 2.0 schedule)

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 3/3/2011 10:54 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> Before the first beta can be released I think #1748 should be fixed. >> Before the first RC the Solaris segfaults should be investigated, and >> documentation f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule (was: Numpy 2.0 schedule)

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southey wrote: >> On 02/28/2011 02:00 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Travis Oliphant   >>> wrote: >>>

[Numpy-discussion] polynomial: polypow et al not exported

Hi Charles, Is it intentional that chebpow/legpow/polypow are not in __all__? That is breaking crosslinks in the docs and it looks to me like it's just an oversight. Cheers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Small typo in fromregex

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Matthieu Brucher wrote: > Hi, > I'm sorry I didn't file a bug, I have some troubles getting my old trac > account back :| > In lib/npyio.py, there is a mistake line 1029. > Instead on fh.close(), it should have been file.close(). If fromregex opens > the file, it

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule (was: Numpy 2.0 schedule)

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southey wrote: >> It would be great to do some 'housekeeping' and try to address some of >> the old tickets dealt with before numpy 2.0. For example, I think ticket >>

[Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.6 schedule (was: Numpy 2.0 schedule)

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Southey wrote: > On 02/28/2011 02:00 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Travis Oliphant   >> wrote: >>> The reason for a NumPy 1.6 suggestion, is that Mark (and others it would >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 2.0 schedule

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > The other thing that needs to be done is some (more) documentation of > new features. Einsum and the new iterator seem to be well documented, > but not described in the release notes. Hmm, I take that back. Just saw that np.newite

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 2.0 schedule

Hi, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > The reason for a NumPy 1.6 suggestion, is that Mark (and others it would > seem) have additional work and features that do not need to wait for the > NumPy 2.0 ABI design to finalize in order to get out there. > If someone is willing t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Adding `offset` argument to np.lib.format.open_memmap and np.load

Hi Jon, Thanks for the patch, and sorry for the slow reply. On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Jon Olav Vik wrote: > https://github.com/jonovik/numpy/compare/master...offset_memmap > > The `offset` argument to np.memmap enables memory-mapping a portion of a file > on disk to a memory-mapped Numpy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems with installation (wrong Python version)

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Dumka Dumka wrote: > Dear numpy Community, > I try to install numpy on my Windows 7. I take the code from here: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/  (I click on "Download > numpy-1.5.1-win32-superpack-python2.6.exe (5.4 MB)"). > After I start the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy docs dependency problem in Ubuntu

Hi Barry, On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I hope this message is on-topic for this mailing list! > > I'm working on the packaging for python-numpy 1.5 in the next version of > Ubuntu (11.04 - Natty), and I'm hitting an issue that I'm hoping you can > help > me with. > > No

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy docs dependency problem in Ubuntu

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:40:57 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > [clip] > > Neither will be acceptable I think. Prebuilt by upstream won't fly > > for Debian because they'd want the source and build process, and I > > don't see a feasible way for t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 2.0 schedule

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Ralf Gommers < >> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> The PIL test can s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 2.0 schedule

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Ralf Gommers < >> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 2.0 schedule

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Travis Oliphant >> wrote: >> >>> >>> It may make sense for a NumPy 1.6 to come out in March / April in the >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] How can I install numpy on Python 3.1 in Ubuntu?

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:22 PM, cool-RR wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have Ubuntu 10.10 server on EC2. I installed Python 3.1, and now I want > to install NumPy on it. How do I do it? I tried `easy_install-3.1 numpy` but > got this error: > Just do "python3.1 setup.py install". That's always a be

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64 bit Windows installers for NumPy?

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Peter < numpy-discuss...@maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Peter > > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:02 PM

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64 bit Windows installers for NumPy?

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Peter < numpy-discuss...@maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > I believe the problem has been been 64 bit fortran for ATLAS, the mingw > > version has/had problems. A plain build using the MS compilers works

Re: [Numpy-discussion] compatibility for supporting more than 2 versions of numpy

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:27 AM, wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Bruce Southey > wrote: > > > > Scipy release notes usually state the supported numpy version eg from > > the current 0.8.0 release notes > > "This release requires Python 2.4 - 2.6 and NumPy 1.4.1 or greater." > > Conseq

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Prime size FFT: bluestein transform vs general chirp/z transform ?

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:46 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > Hi, > > I finally took the time to clean up my code to speed up prime-size FFT > (which use a O(N^2) algo in both numpy and scipy). The code is there: > https://github.com/cournape/numpy/tree/bluestein (most of the code is > tests, because

Re: [Numpy-discussion] segfault on complex array on solaris x86

I've opened http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1713 so this doesn't get lost. Ralf On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:27 AM, John Hunter wrote: > johnh@udesktop253:~> gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath) > Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.5.1 - Mac - with Activestate Python 3

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Sebastian Haase wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Chris Barker > wrote: > > On 1/12/2011 12:57 PM, David Cortesi wrote: > >> I have installed ActiveState's Python 3 packages on Mac OS X 10.6.6. > > > >> When I run the Mac OS installer it shows all disks as

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X binaries.

On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Gideon wrote: > I noticed that 1.5.1 was released, and sourceforge is suggesting I use > the package numpy-1.5.1-py2.6-python.org-macosx10.3.dmg. However, I > have an OS X 10.6 machine. > > Can/should I use this binary? > Yes you can. The naming scheme correspond

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Links to doc guidelines broken

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Fernando Perez wrote: > Howdy, > > In the ipython doc guide (and many other places) we point to the numpy > coding guidelines (especially for documentation), but today while > conducting a sprint at the Scipy India conference, I noticed this > link is now dead: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy and Python3

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Katharina wrote: > Hello everyone, > > first, I'm really apologise for my English-skills. But I have only one > simple questions. Does NumPy work on Python3 now. > I read so many articles on the Internet, but you can only read some > speculation and not a clear st

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Refactor fork uses the ./configure, make, make install process.

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Jason McCampbell < > jmccampb...@enthought.com> wrote: > >> Sorry for the late reply... I missed this thread. Thanks to Ilan for >> pointing it out. A variety of comments below... >> >> On Sat, Dec 4,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Friedrich Romstedt < friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > 2010/12/5 Ralf Gommers : > > It does look like a complete set. And it was named correctly and in sync > > with python.org for a single week. From pythonmac list: >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: > On 11/20/10 11:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce the availability of NumPy 1.5.1. >> > > Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/nu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [PATCH] gfortran under macports

any people because the latter was issues. Cheers, Ralf Paul > > 4. des.. 2010 15.04 "Ralf Gommers" : > > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Fabian Pedregosa < > fabian.pedreg...@inria.fr> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec ... > > I would prefer to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [PATCH] gfortran under macports

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Fabian Pedregosa wrote: > On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Gael Varoquaux > wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 10:25:52AM +0100, Fabian Pedregosa wrote: > >> The correct command is "sudo gcc_select mp-gcc45" which effectively > >> does all the symbolic links for yo

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of NumPy 1.5.1. This bug-fix release comes almost 3 months after the 1.5.0 release, it contains no new features compared to 1.5.0. Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/. Thank you to everyon

Re: [Numpy-discussion] pyc and pyo files in dmg and other python3 questions also a dmg for python3.1 to try

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > The questions below regard the osx dmg installer, not sure about how > this applies to other installers. > > I noticed that pyc and pyo files are included in the binaries. Is > there a reason for this? I have removed them in the dmg for pytho

Re: [Numpy-discussion] bzr mirror

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> While cleaning up the numpy wiki start page I came across a bzr m

[Numpy-discussion] bzr mirror

Hi, While cleaning up the numpy wiki start page I came across a bzr mirror that still pointed to svn, https://launchpad.net/numpy, originally registered by Jarrod. It would be good to either point that to git or delete it. I couldn't see how to report or do anything about that on Launchpad, but th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > 2010/11/9 Sébastien Barthélemy : >> On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> That will require renaming those files in the source tree from *.txt >>> to *.rst, otherwise there's no way to have github re

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-compiler options

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Dan Yamins wrote: > Hi: > I'm trying to build numpy with python27, 64-bit, on OSX 10.5.8. > When I run  python setup.py build,   only 32-bit binaries get built.   I can > see what is happening is that not 64-bit flags are getting passed to the c > compiler (I don't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Python2.7 version check for OSX numpy installer (please Test)

Hi Vincent, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > No need to actualy install, You should get an error right away if you do not > have both. > /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/python2.7 > /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/python2.7-32 > If

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move

2010/11/9 Sébastien Barthélemy : > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> That will require renaming those files in the source tree from *.txt >> to *.rst, otherwise there's no way to have github render them >> properly. Unless I missed something. Would that be fin

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1 release candidate 2

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate of NumPy 1.5.1. This is a bug-fix release with no new features compared to 1.5.0. Please test and report any issues on the numpy mailing list. If no new issues are reported, the final 1.5.1 release will follow in a week.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] updated 1.5.1 release schedule

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Since we weren't able to stick to the original schedule for 1.5.1, >> here's a short note about the current status

Re: [Numpy-discussion] updated 1.5.1 release schedule

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Since we weren't able to stick to the original schedule for 1.5.1, >> here's a short note about the c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:00:47 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> I just noticed that the Trac wiki is not displaying updates to files >> kept in the source tree, for example >> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/TestingGuid

[Numpy-discussion] updated 1.5.1 release schedule

Hi, Since we weren't able to stick to the original schedule for 1.5.1, here's a short note about the current status. There are two changes that need to go in before RC2: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/9 If no one has time for a review I'll commit those t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Matlab IO Warning in mio5.py

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Luc Dekoninck wrote: > > > Hello, > > Got the same error, working on windows 7, 64 bit... > > Does this help? > Is there  a solution available? > It's not an error but a harmless (although confusing) warning message. You should be able to filter it by adding the f

[Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move

Hi, I just noticed that the Trac wiki is not displaying updates to files kept in the source tree, for example http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/TestingGuidelines is stuck at an older version. Can one of the admins point the ReST plugin to github? Ralf _

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-User] please test/review: Scipy on OS X with Python 2.7

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> >> Hi Vincent, >> >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Vincent Davis >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Ok I am a l

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-User] please test/review: Scipy on OS X with Python 2.7

Hi Vincent, On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Vincent Davis wrote: > > > Ok I am a little more awake now and not in zombi mode. That is  correct osx > 10.6 c++4.2, Doing it again and maybe correctly with python-2.7-macosx10.5 > and c++4.0. > full scipy test results here > https://gist.github.com/6

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ~2**32 byte tofile()/fromfile() limit in 64-bit Windows?

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 11/3/2010 1:13 AM, Martin Spacek wrote: >> I just opened a new ticket (http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1660), >> but I >> thought I'd bring it up here as well. I can't seem to get tofile() or save() >> to >> write anything m

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-User] please test/review: Scipy on OS X with Python 2.7

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> If you had an issue recently trying to compile scipy on OS X, can you >> please try to install numpy from >> http://gith

[Numpy-discussion] please test/review: Scipy on OS X with Python 2.7

Hi, If you had an issue recently trying to compile scipy on OS X, can you please try to install numpy from http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/commits/farchs and then compile scipy? A quick review from a numpy.distutils expert would also be very welcome. Related (long) discussion at http://projects.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1 release candidate 1

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > 2010/11/1 Ralf Gommers : >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ralf Gommers >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Friedrich Romstedt >>> wrote: >>>> I found som

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1 release candidate 1

Hi Friedrich, On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Friedrich Romstedt > wrote: >> I found some issues on Mac OS X 10.5 ppc in py2.5.4: Can you please check if this takes care of all test failures you reported: http://github.com/rg

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Including fix for #1637 in 1.5.1 ?

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:46 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > Hi, > > I just committed a quick fix for > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1637. I did want to include it > for 1.5.x branch as it is already in RC stage, but it may still be > useful to do so if the release managers think it is app

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1 release candidate 1

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > I found some issues on Mac OS X 10.5 ppc in py2.5.4: > > See here: > > http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/numpy/tree/release%2F1.5.1rc1%2Fpy2.5-python.org-macosx10.3/release/logs/osx105rh/ The inf/exp failures should be marked as known

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1 release candidate 1

file left over from an install of the master branch. Cheers, Ralf > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Darren Dale wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Ralf Gomme

Re: [Numpy-discussion] clearing after build; Some directories missing in .gitignore?

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > I was tearing my hear out yesterday evening with trying to find out > and to understand how this directories occur in the build process and > what role they play: > > build_doc/ This is just where the generated pdf's are copied to, see

Re: [Numpy-discussion] tests fails when run $nosetests numpy, but not from python prompt

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > 2010/10/25 Vincent Davis : >> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:29 PM,   wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Ralf Gommers >>> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Vincent Davis >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Build Process and Version Control

Hi Friedrich, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > Hi, > > here is a summary of what we got so far with the Mac OS X build process: Thanks for the detailed info on what you are doing. First maybe a general comment: the current release scripts work quite well, so it's prob

Re: [Numpy-discussion] tests fails when run $nosetests numpy, but not from python prompt

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > python2.7 10.5, osx 10.6, numpy 1.5.1rc1 > Test pass when run from python prompt (see bottom) but fail when run > from $nosetests numpy. That is expected, see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/40781. Cheers, Ralf

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1 release candidate 1

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Vincent Davis wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release >> candidate of NumPy 1.5.1. This is a bug-fix release with no new

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

2010/10/17 Stéfan van der Walt : > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> IIRC, they recommended pushing from local branches to master on github and >> not merging master to the development branches. That doesn't sound right to >> me, but perhaps I misunderstood... > > T

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: NumPy 1.5.1 release candidate 1

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of NumPy 1.5.1. This is a bug-fix release with no new features compared to 1.5.0. Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/. A note on the available binaries for OS

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > 2010/10/17 Stéfan van der Walt : >> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >>> >>> IIRC, they recommended pushing from local branches to master on github and >>> not mergin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please help a newbie install NUMPY

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Jonathan Rocher wrote: > Hi, > > You might want to try using easy_install >> sudo easy_install numpy > > For some doc about it, see > http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall > easy_install really does not help to do a numpy install from source, and ma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sorry, probably postponing Binary Release [urgent]

Hi Friedrich, On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working the past few days usually to somewhen between 1 and > 7 in the morning on the numpy build, but I feel at the end of my > power. Thanks for working so hard, but please don't burn yourself out - w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X installers - naming scheme and 2.7 annoyance

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org >> (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > 2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : >> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Friedrich Romstedt >> wrote: >>> 2)  I noticed that the paver at some late point tried to switch from >>> py2.5 to py2.6, what is rather s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X installers - naming scheme and 2.7 annoyance

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > 2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : >> With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org >> (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming >> scheme is needed for the numpy binarie

[Numpy-discussion] OS X installers - naming scheme and 2.7 annoyance

Hi all, With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming scheme is needed for the numpy binaries. That's assuming we provide two corresponding installers with the same arches. I propose the following: "num

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Tesing of the numpy 1.5.1 dmgs

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Friedrich Romstedt < friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I just poked around the newly created files, and here they are: > > The dmg: > > http://friedrichromstedt.org/numpy/Release/10-10-16/01-numpy-2.0.0.dev-py2.5-python.org.dmg > (just to be sure: PREL

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Friedrich Romstedt < friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/10/15 Christopher Barker : > > On 10/15/10 10:54 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > >> I have a 10.4 Intel machine I keep around > >> for the sole purpose of building backward-compatible binary installers >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Friedrich Romstedt < friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote: > One more question: Do we support any external library in the official > binaries? I've heard the names MKL and BLAS, LAPACK, ... all stuff I > don't know really tbh, but do we have to install them? > > No,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: > On 10/13/10 8:30 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > For what it's worth, the posted binary seems to work fine on my OS-X > > 10.5 PPC system (python2.6), so maybe the PPC part works, the Intel > part > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] installing different tag or branches from git source

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > Ok so this is more of a git question but and I think it might be > simple I just don't get it. > Lets say I get a copy of numpy, > $git clone http://github.com/numpy/numpy.git > and now I what install the 1.4.1 release which is a "tag" > or >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: > Vincent Davis wrote: > > Ok, Friedrich and I are working on setting up a machine for building > > on 10.5 and hope (I do) to have that going for 1.5.1rc1 > > I hope to do a 10.6 for 1.5rc1 also. > > why have a separate 10.6 build? > > A

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Christopher Barker wrote: > Ralf Gommers wrote: > > Yes I got one response at http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1322, a > > negative one unfortunately. > > For what it's worth, the posted binary seems to work fine on my OS-X > 10

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Vincent Davis wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > Hi Friedrich, > > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Friedrich Romstedt > > wrote: > >> > >> 2010/10/9 Vincent Davis : > &g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

Hi Friedrich, On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Friedrich Romstedt < friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/10/9 Vincent Davis : > > Did you get any responses on this? I can install 10.5 and help out > > with some testing. I have a macbookpro that does not turn of (Hardware > > issue) but it i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

bot.scipy.org/, but it does not build/install binaries. I also just noticed it has not been updated for the switch to git - perhaps an indication of how much attention we're paying to it. Ralf > Vincent > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > Hi, > &

Re: [Numpy-discussion] known failure test decorator not treated as expected by nose

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Jonathan March wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jonathan March > wrote: > >> It appears that the numpy testing decorators for skipping and for > >> known failure should behave similarly to each other, at least f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] DEV_README.txt update, SVN -> git

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Peter < numpy-discuss...@maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > Just FYI: > > The DEV_README.txt file needs a trivial update to talk about git not SVN > > Thanks, fixed in commit a8441313. Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Schedule for 1.5.1?

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 10/ 6/10 12:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that > > would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series: > > > > Any Python versions: > > > > - #1605 (Cython vs

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >