lines.
John Zwinck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
unusual), why force them to always type in the
boilerplate independent=True to make it work?
John Zwinck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
is
1-d, it can simply be ignored.
John Zwinck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Sebastian Wagner se...@sebix.at wrote:
So, for non-structured arrays, the consens is an Exception. The question
is, which one.
AttributeError would be fully backwards compatible. Existing code checks
for the method and if it exists, the object has fields.
On 3 Oct 2014 07:09, T J tjhn...@gmail.com wrote:
Any bites on this?
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:23 PM, T J tjhn...@gmail.com wrote:
Python's round function goes away from zero, so I am looking for the
NumPy equivalent (and using vectorize() seems undesirable). In this sense,
it seems that
On 1 Oct 2014 04:30, Stephan Hoyer sho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn
hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com wrote:
On more careful reading of your words, I think we agree; indeed, if
keys() is present is should return an iterable; but I don't think it should
be
with NumPy
arrays, Python dicts, and other types like Pandas DataFrames, h5py
Files, and more. It's a fairly common thing to want to get the keys
of a container, where keys is understood to be a sequence of values
one can pass to __getitem__(), and this is exactly what I'm aiming at.
Thoughts?
John
