On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Stéfan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.zawrote:
that the main thing missing at this point is fixing the datetime
problems.
What needs to be done, and what is the plan forward?
I'm not sure that's quite been decided, but my take:
1) remove the existing time zone
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
The question has come up as to how much effort we should spend backporting
fixes to 1.8.x. An alternative would be to tag 1.9.0 early next year,
aiming for a release around April. I think there is almost
Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers at gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at
gmail.com wrote:
and think that the main thing missing at this point is fixing the datetime
problems.
Is anyone planning to work on this? If yes, you need a rough
On 9 Nov 2013 03:22, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
that the main thing missing at this point is fixing the datetime problems.
What needs to be done, and what is the plan forward? Is there perhaps an
issue one can follow?
Thanks
Stéfan
Hi All,
The question has come up as to how much effort we should spend backporting
fixes to 1.8.x. An alternative would be to tag 1.9.0 early next year,
aiming for a release around April. I think there is almost enough in
1.9-devel to justify a release. There is Sebastian's index work, Julian's
