Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase seb.ha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that technically not possible ? You're not being dense, there are no 2.5 scipy binaries. I did not succeed in building them. The scipy 0.7 branch is so old (from Jan 2009) that it has never been compiled on OS X 10.6, and I did not yet find a way to get it to work. For Windows I also had problems, there it should be compiled against numpy 1.2 while the 2.6 binaries are compiled against numpy 1.3. The variations in numpy, python and OS just added up to make it unworkable. I can give it another try after the final release, but first priority is to finally release. To remind myself of the issue I tried building it again, and managed to build a 2.5 binary against numpy 1.3 on OS X at least. Can anyone tell me why 2.5 binaries are supposed to be built against numpy 1.2 and 2.6 binaries against numpy 1.3? It seems I've crawled a bit further up the learning curve since last time I tried. Scipy binaries for python 2.5 (built against numpy 1.2) are now on Sourceforge, please test them. What does built against numpy 1.2 actually mean exactly ? Is that just a building time thing and they actually work together (at run time) with numpy 1.4.1 ? That would be all fine then ... what platform(s) are you talking about ? (What about Windows?) - Sebastian ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy list. I had a round of segfaults in the SciPy/NumPy interlink, which I eventually tracked down to a leftover _dotblas.so from an older NumPy version lying in site-packages (apparently that file is gone in the newer NumPy, but would still be imported under some circumstances, and I foolishly just installed over the old version and subsequently forgot that I had done so). This could have been avoided with a warning about removing any old numpy lying around first (though perhaps others are not as stupid as I was). -- Dag Sverre ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: Ralf Gommers wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy list. I had a round of segfaults in the SciPy/NumPy interlink, which I eventually tracked down to a leftover _dotblas.so from an older NumPy version lying in site-packages (apparently that file is gone in the newer NumPy, but would still be imported under some circumstances, and I foolishly just installed over the old version and subsequently forgot that I had done so). Sorry for the noise, the segfault was due to something else, I only thought I had fixed it. But it's my own MKL-specific mess causing it, so nothing to worry about. -- Dag Sverre ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Sebastian Haase seb.ha...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: It seems I've crawled a bit further up the learning curve since last time I tried. Scipy binaries for python 2.5 (built against numpy 1.2) are now on Sourceforge, please test them. What does built against numpy 1.2 actually mean exactly ? Is that just a building time thing and they actually work together (at run time) with numpy 1.4.1 ? That would be all fine then ... what platform(s) are you talking about ? (What about Windows?) Correct, and it's the same for Windows and OS X binaries. Some scipy modules include a numpy header file (mostly arrayobject.h). This is now forward-compatible, so scipy compiled against numpy 1.2 works with 1.3 and 1.4.1 as well. It won't work with numpy 2.0 though, and was the reason for the issues with numpy 1.4.0. In 1.4.0 the layout of the ndarray object in memory changed (hence this minor release to undo that change), causing segfaults when used with scipy or other extensions compiled against older numpy. Cheers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase seb.ha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that technically not possible ? You're not being dense, there are no 2.5 scipy binaries. I did not succeed in building them. The scipy 0.7 branch is so old (from Jan 2009) that it has never been compiled on OS X 10.6, and I did not yet find a way to get it to work. For Windows I also had problems, there it should be compiled against numpy 1.2 while the 2.6 binaries are compiled against numpy 1.3. The variations in numpy, python and OS just added up to make it unworkable. I can give it another try after the final release, but first priority is to finally release. To remind myself of the issue I tried building it again, and managed to build a 2.5 binary against numpy 1.3 on OS X at least. Can anyone tell me why 2.5 binaries are supposed to be built against numpy 1.2 and 2.6 binaries against numpy 1.3? It seems I've crawled a bit further up the learning curve since last time I tried. Scipy binaries for python 2.5 (built against numpy 1.2) are now on Sourceforge, please test them. Cheers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
Hi, Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that technically not possible ? Thanks, Sebastian Haase On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy list. Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/ Changes from RC2 == SciPy: warnings about possible binary incompatibilities with numpy have been suppressed NumPy: - fixed compatibility with Python 2.7b1 - marked test for complex log as a known failure NumPy 1.4.1 == The main change over 1.4.0 is that datetime support has been removed. This fixes the binary incompatibility issues between NumPy and other libraries like SciPy and Matplotlib. There are also a number of other bug fixes, and no new features. Binaries for Python 2.5 and 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. SciPy 0.7.2 = The only change compared to 0.7.1 is that the C sources for Cython code have been regenerated with Cython 0.12.1. This ensures that SciPy 0.7.2 will work with NumPy 1.4.1, while also retaining backwards compatibility with NumPy 1.3.0. Note that the 0.7.x branch was created in January 2009, so a lot of fixes and new functionality in current trunk is not present in this release. Binaries for Python 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. Due to the age of the code no binaries for Python 2.5 are available. On behalf of the NumPy and SciPy developers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
Hi, I'm trying to compile scipy with ICC (numpy got through correctly), but I have issue with infinites in cephes: icc: scipy/special/cephes/const.c scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */ ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ compilation aborted for scipy/special/cephes/const.c (code 2) scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */ ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ compilation aborted for scipy/special/cephes/const.c (code 2) Matthieu 2010/4/19 Sebastian Haase seb.ha...@gmail.com: Hi, Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that technically not possible ? Thanks, Sebastian Haase On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy list. Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/ Changes from RC2 == SciPy: warnings about possible binary incompatibilities with numpy have been suppressed NumPy: - fixed compatibility with Python 2.7b1 - marked test for complex log as a known failure NumPy 1.4.1 == The main change over 1.4.0 is that datetime support has been removed. This fixes the binary incompatibility issues between NumPy and other libraries like SciPy and Matplotlib. There are also a number of other bug fixes, and no new features. Binaries for Python 2.5 and 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. SciPy 0.7.2 = The only change compared to 0.7.1 is that the C sources for Cython code have been regenerated with Cython 0.12.1. This ensures that SciPy 0.7.2 will work with NumPy 1.4.1, while also retaining backwards compatibility with NumPy 1.3.0. Note that the 0.7.x branch was created in January 2009, so a lot of fixes and new functionality in current trunk is not present in this release. Binaries for Python 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. Due to the age of the code no binaries for Python 2.5 are available. On behalf of the NumPy and SciPy developers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
BTW, there still is an error with ifort, so scipy is still incompatible with the Intel compilers (which is at least very sad...) Matthieu 2010/4/19 Matthieu Brucher matthieu.bruc...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm trying to compile scipy with ICC (numpy got through correctly), but I have issue with infinites in cephes: icc: scipy/special/cephes/const.c scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */ ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ compilation aborted for scipy/special/cephes/const.c (code 2) scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */ ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ compilation aborted for scipy/special/cephes/const.c (code 2) Matthieu 2010/4/19 Sebastian Haase seb.ha...@gmail.com: Hi, Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that technically not possible ? Thanks, Sebastian Haase On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy list. Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/ Changes from RC2 == SciPy: warnings about possible binary incompatibilities with numpy have been suppressed NumPy: - fixed compatibility with Python 2.7b1 - marked test for complex log as a known failure NumPy 1.4.1 == The main change over 1.4.0 is that datetime support has been removed. This fixes the binary incompatibility issues between NumPy and other libraries like SciPy and Matplotlib. There are also a number of other bug fixes, and no new features. Binaries for Python 2.5 and 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. SciPy 0.7.2 = The only change compared to 0.7.1 is that the C sources for Cython code have been regenerated with Cython 0.12.1. This ensures that SciPy 0.7.2 will work with NumPy 1.4.1, while also retaining backwards compatibility with NumPy 1.3.0. Note that the 0.7.x branch was created in January 2009, so a lot of fixes and new functionality in current trunk is not present in this release. Binaries for Python 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. Due to the age of the code no binaries for Python 2.5 are available. On behalf of the NumPy and SciPy developers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase seb.ha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that technically not possible ? You're not being dense, there are no 2.5 scipy binaries. I did not succeed in building them. The scipy 0.7 branch is so old (from Jan 2009) that it has never been compiled on OS X 10.6, and I did not yet find a way to get it to work. For Windows I also had problems, there it should be compiled against numpy 1.2 while the 2.6 binaries are compiled against numpy 1.3. The variations in numpy, python and OS just added up to make it unworkable. I can give it another try after the final release, but first priority is to finally release. Cheers, Ralf On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy list. Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/ Changes from RC2 == SciPy: warnings about possible binary incompatibilities with numpy have been suppressed NumPy: - fixed compatibility with Python 2.7b1 - marked test for complex log as a known failure NumPy 1.4.1 == The main change over 1.4.0 is that datetime support has been removed. This fixes the binary incompatibility issues between NumPy and other libraries like SciPy and Matplotlib. There are also a number of other bug fixes, and no new features. Binaries for Python 2.5 and 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. SciPy 0.7.2 = The only change compared to 0.7.1 is that the C sources for Cython code have been regenerated with Cython 0.12.1. This ensures that SciPy 0.7.2 will work with NumPy 1.4.1, while also retaining backwards compatibility with NumPy 1.3.0. Note that the 0.7.x branch was created in January 2009, so a lot of fixes and new functionality in current trunk is not present in this release. Binaries for Python 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. Due to the age of the code no binaries for Python 2.5 are available. On behalf of the NumPy and SciPy developers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Matthieu Brucher matthieu.bruc...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, there still is an error with ifort, so scipy is still incompatible with the Intel compilers (which is at least very sad...) Is this true for trunk as well? Scipy 0.7 branch has hardly been touched for a year so it's not surprising that there's no progress on this. If you're compiling, I don't see much of a point in going for the 0.7 branch. Cheers, Ralf Matthieu 2010/4/19 Matthieu Brucher matthieu.bruc...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm trying to compile scipy with ICC (numpy got through correctly), but I have issue with infinites in cephes: icc: scipy/special/cephes/const.c scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */ ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ compilation aborted for scipy/special/cephes/const.c (code 2) scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */ ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ compilation aborted for scipy/special/cephes/const.c (code 2) Matthieu 2010/4/19 Sebastian Haase seb.ha...@gmail.com: Hi, Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that technically not possible ? Thanks, Sebastian Haase On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy list. Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/ Changes from RC2 == SciPy: warnings about possible binary incompatibilities with numpy have been suppressed NumPy: - fixed compatibility with Python 2.7b1 - marked test for complex log as a known failure NumPy 1.4.1 == The main change over 1.4.0 is that datetime support has been removed. This fixes the binary incompatibility issues between NumPy and other libraries like SciPy and Matplotlib. There are also a number of other bug fixes, and no new features. Binaries for Python 2.5 and 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. SciPy 0.7.2 = The only change compared to 0.7.1 is that the C sources for Cython code have been regenerated with Cython 0.12.1. This ensures that SciPy 0.7.2 will work with NumPy 1.4.1, while also retaining backwards compatibility with NumPy 1.3.0. Note that the 0.7.x branch was created in January 2009, so a lot of fixes and new functionality in current trunk is not present in this release. Binaries for Python 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. Due to the age of the code no binaries for Python 2.5 are available. On behalf of the NumPy and SciPy developers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
On 04/19/2010 04:45 PM, Matthieu Brucher wrote: Hi, I'm trying to compile scipy with ICC (numpy got through correctly), but I have issue with infinites in cephes: icc: scipy/special/cephes/const.c scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */ ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ compilation aborted for scipy/special/cephes/const.c (code 2) scipy/special/cephes/const.c(94): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double INFINITY = 1.0/0.0; /* 99e999; */ ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ scipy/special/cephes/const.c(99): error: floating-point operation result is out of range double NAN = 1.0/0.0 - 1.0/0.0; ^ compilation aborted for scipy/special/cephes/const.c (code 2) All those have been fixed in scipy 0.8, and cannot be backported to scipy 0.7.x (because it requires the new math library as available from numpy 1.4.0). I know for sure that scipy trunk + numpy 1.4.x work with ifort + MSVC on windows 64 (more exactly it worked in december 2009), cheers, David ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.comwrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Sebastian Haase seb.ha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Congratulations. I might be unnecessarily dense - but what SciPy am I supposed to use with the new numpy 1.4.1 for Python 2.5? I'm surprised that there are no SciPy 0.7.2 binaries for Python 2.5 - is that technically not possible ? You're not being dense, there are no 2.5 scipy binaries. I did not succeed in building them. The scipy 0.7 branch is so old (from Jan 2009) that it has never been compiled on OS X 10.6, and I did not yet find a way to get it to work. For Windows I also had problems, there it should be compiled against numpy 1.2 while the 2.6 binaries are compiled against numpy 1.3. The variations in numpy, python and OS just added up to make it unworkable. I can give it another try after the final release, but first priority is to finally release. To remind myself of the issue I tried building it again, and managed to build a 2.5 binary against numpy 1.3 on OS X at least. Can anyone tell me why 2.5 binaries are supposed to be built against numpy 1.2 and 2.6 binaries against numpy 1.3? Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
[Numpy-discussion] Release candidate 3 for NumPy 1.4.1 and SciPy 0.7.2
Hi, I am pleased to announce the third release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2 and NumPy 1.4.1. Please test, and report any problems on the NumPy or SciPy list. Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/ Changes from RC2 == SciPy: warnings about possible binary incompatibilities with numpy have been suppressed NumPy: - fixed compatibility with Python 2.7b1 - marked test for complex log as a known failure NumPy 1.4.1 == The main change over 1.4.0 is that datetime support has been removed. This fixes the binary incompatibility issues between NumPy and other libraries like SciPy and Matplotlib. There are also a number of other bug fixes, and no new features. Binaries for Python 2.5 and 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. SciPy 0.7.2 = The only change compared to 0.7.1 is that the C sources for Cython code have been regenerated with Cython 0.12.1. This ensures that SciPy 0.7.2 will work with NumPy 1.4.1, while also retaining backwards compatibility with NumPy 1.3.0. Note that the 0.7.x branch was created in January 2009, so a lot of fixes and new functionality in current trunk is not present in this release. Binaries for Python 2.6 are available for both Windows and OS X. Due to the age of the code no binaries for Python 2.5 are available. On behalf of the NumPy and SciPy developers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
