On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan wrote:
3. I admit, my students are NOT using non-boolen fancy indexing on
multidimensional arrays. (As far as I know.) Are yours?
The only confusing case is mixing slices and integer array indexing
for ndim 2.
On Do, 2015-04-09 at 02:22 -0400, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
1. I use numpy in teaching.
I have never heard a complaint about its indexing behavior.
Have you heard such complaints?
Some observations:
1) There's an
Alan wrote:
3. I admit, my students are NOT using non-boolen fancy indexing on
multidimensional arrays. (As far as I know.) Are yours?
On 4/9/2015 2:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Well, okay, this would explain it, since integer fancy indexing is
exactly the confusing case:-) On the plus
On 4/9/2015 1:57 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Do you think there's anything we could be
doing to reduce this kind of adrenaline reaction while still allowing
for relaxed discussion about out-there ideas?
numpy3...@scipy.org
:-)
___
NumPy-Discussion
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
1. I use numpy in teaching.
I have never heard a complaint about its indexing behavior.
Have you heard such complaints?
Some observations:
1) There's an unrelated thread on numpy-discussion right now in which
a user is
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
To address in detail the list of Matthew you mention above:
* implement orthogonal indexing as a method arr.sensible_index[...]
That's
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Alan G Isaac alan.is...@gmail.com wrote:
That analogy fails because it suggests a private conversation. This list is
extremely public.
For example, I am just a user, and I am on it. I can tell you that as a
long-time numpy user
my reaction to the proposal to
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Apr 5, 2015 7:04 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Apr 4, 2015 4:12 AM, Todd toddr...@gmail.com wrote:
There was no
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Apr 5, 2015 7:04 AM, Robert Kern robert.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Apr
On 2015/04/08 8:09 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
That analogy fails because it suggests a private conversation. This list is
extremely public.
For example, I am just a user, and I am on it. I can tell you that as a
long-time numpy user
my reaction to the proposal to change indexing semantics was
That analogy fails because it suggests a private conversation. This list is
extremely public.
For example, I am just a user, and I am on it. I can tell you that as a
long-time numpy user
my reaction to the proposal to change indexing semantics was (i) OMG YMBFKM and
then
(ii) take a breath;
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
On 2015/04/08 8:09 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
That analogy fails because it suggests a private conversation. This list
is extremely public.
For example, I am just a user, and I am on it. I can tell you that as a
long-time
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Now, can we please get back to consideration of reasonable options?
Sure, but I recommend going back to the actually topical thread (or a new
one), as this one is meta.
--
Robert Kern
On 2015/04/08 9:40 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
Their proposal is not being discussed; instead that potentially useful
discussion is being completely derailed by insisting on wanting to talk
about changes to numpy's indexing behavior.
Good point. That was an unintended consequence of my message.
1. I use numpy in teaching.
I have never heard a complaint about its indexing behavior.
Have you heard such complaints?
2. One reason I use numpy in teaching is its indexing behavior.
What specific language provides a better indexing model,
in your opinion?
3. I admit, my students are NOT using
On 2015/04/08 10:02 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
3. I admit, my students are NOT using non-boolen fancy indexing on
multidimensional arrays. (As far as I know.) Are yours?
Yes, one attempted to, essentially by accident. That was in my original
message. Please refer back to that. The earlier
Trying to bring the meta back into this thread (sorry for Robert's PB :)...
The only thing I'd like to add, is that it's perhaps worth messaging that:
a PR is just (as the Github folks like to say) a conversation based on
code. It is NOT necessarily something intended explicitly for merging.
In
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
To address in detail the list of Matthew you mention above:
* implement orthogonal indexing as a method arr.sensible_index[...]
That's basically Jaime's PR.
* implement the current non-boolean fancy indexing
18 matches
Mail list logo
