On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, jh wrote:
Kevin M. Agard wrote:
I believe the answer to your question is yes, it is illegal.
The question, actually, was: is there any case law, convictions, or
anything indicating that this is illegal in any manner?
IANAL suppositions, while I tend to agree, are
was mostly
commercialized (no nsfnet, etc).
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
they want, and let consumers
choose wisely.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
make a decision.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
finally got a Trader Joe's. Anything
can happen!
i second that. first time I was at Fry's in Vegas, I thought this is a
geek's heaven...
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Dana Spiegel wrote:
Content providers (who are only 1 aspect of people who provide
information/service on the net) already pay for their pipe. ATT and
Verizon's concept of freedom isn't freedom at all. Its double taxation.
You would have a content provider pay for their
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
Alex, I have been working on: http://www.nycwireless.net/unwireapt
I didn't know what to put in for a realistic estimate on cabling costs
per AP. $300-$1000 is too large of a range to be useful. What do you
think the average would be?
Because
:
a) enclosures etc to make sure stuff doesn't get jacked.
b) pay for labor to run the wire around. It could be 300-1000$ for that.
c) non-ghetto APs. I encourage competitors to build their business based
on wrt54g and unofficial firmware
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un
and Japan,
you have absolutely no guarantee you will be able to do that 24/7, nor
recourse if you can't.
Internet is based on best effort service. Congestion is a *normal* and
*expected* condition.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman
you intentionally misread what I want to do. I'll repeat, for
posterity, 'If a monopoly carrier chooses not to allow others to have
access to its network for resale, it should be bound by the neutrality'.
Please stop cc'ing the posts to your private mailing list.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Ruben Safir wrote:
As a result, you are entirely wrong about backbones 'processing' IP ToS
tagged frames - no carrier that I know does respect user-set IP ToS tags
with regard to queueing. All IP transit is best effort. (exceptions are
certain carriers offering
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Ruben Safir wrote:
No Alex, nor someone like myself becomes a common carrier when some
purchases service from us. The common part in question for us is the
copper and fiber plant the public has paid for. Not the access
hardware nor the service infrastructure ISP's
not the zaniness of your opinions that
get me, but the bravado that you state them with!
Another non-sequitur.
BTW Alex, please do SOMETHING about the spam emulating from your
network.
Uh huh. Please stop beating your wife. Oh, and get a dictionary.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http
of Vonage without any new laws).
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
.
Which is it Alex. Can we regulate them (and you) or not? Not this
bogus conversation your having about customer requested QOS and the
generalized choosing of service grades for clients. The business
practice of using your common carrier business to discriminate against
other businesses
? Strengthen what?
Devil's in details. Given the fact that NYCWireless historically supports
the more extreme positions, I find it important to emphasize that not all
Neutrality is a good thing.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo
as it doesn't damage the
routing of other packets. In the case of pilosoft, Alex, this means that
you certainly can provide pilosoft VOIP service, and the packets that
carry that service should be optimized appropriately. But, by putting
into place equipment that provides this functionality, you must
is
that ILEC would have to choose between providing access to competitors
like us, or to be bound by net neutrality provisions.
--
Alex Pilosov| DSL, Colocation, Hosting Services
President | [EMAIL PROTECTED]877-PILOSOFT x601
Pilosoft, Inc. | http://www.pilosoft.com
--
NYCwireless - http
Arguing with Ruben as about as pointless as arguing with someone whose
bills are being paid by telcos. ;)
Hint hint.
-alex
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Jim Henry wrote:
No. Check the stats. Do you read any business publications?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
to the dangers Bruce has been fighting
against for a decade.
Anything Kushnick writes should be read with a bucket of salt. Not to say
that he's right on many things, but there just as many things on which
he's nuts.
Currently he's financed by CWA, which is far more corrupt than VZ itself.
-alex
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Frank Coluccio wrote:
As for Verizon going bankrupt, that's another discussion, possibly
another several discussions, entirely. If the consumer wireline side
ever did become distressed due to the misadventures of FiOS, then you
might see something occurring similar to
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats the longest DSL run that you have ever provisioned, anyone?
VZ limit is 18000 for any kind of DSL. Above that, they won't do it.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Michael Stearne wrote:
I figured wireless people do have a lot of experience with wires also.
A friend of wants to wire a new construction house and says he is using
coaxial cable instead of Cat5/6 ethernet. Is there an advantage to using
coaxial (I'm sure speed) but
is that
you need more expensive CPE and termination gear.
But, if I assumed correctly, its a private house - it makes no sense.
C'mon, its 21st century, rock out with ribbon single-mode cable! ;)
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
I am not sure what rocket you had to strap to this article to make the
leap from public policy that promotes broadband to socialism. But it
must have been large! Is NYC's water tunnel number 3 socialism or smart
public policy? What the rural
a little bit on the conference ;) I think he's
on his list too...
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
there, evdo will too.
for a conference booth, I doubt he'll have problems with wifi propagation
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
be in
the red..
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
(less than 10$
new), it's the ongoing costs that are hard to swallow.
New York City won't be a world-class city until it can provide
affordable Internet access.
That's a stretch of imagination. Affordable should not mean subsidized.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
The Cooperative Wholesale model being pursued in Philly does *not*
require tax payer dollars for funding and does *not* compete with
private enterprise. In fact it encourages competition and provides
mechanism for non-profits to offer affordable
is reasonable.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
also have 78% yes.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Yury Gitman wrote:
2) Your Signature to the Devil Called Verizon and Sprint: [I'm just
kidding I love these guys, just some good 'ole teasing] As Alex pointed
out there is only ONE thing preventing anyone from doing this. And that
your signature on the terms of service
/news_dtl.do?id=7261]
Looks to be in NYC already. Has anyone got this service?
Read. It says it *will* be in NYC (sometime). No, it isn't in NYC yet.
(In fact, NYC is in the second round of rollouts).
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman
= by the clueless, for the
clueless.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Mailing Lists wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm a grad student at Parsons looking to do a project that
would involve intercepting cell phone conversations and was hoping some
one who had experience doing it could point me in the right direction.
I would need it to have a range
.
On other hand, if you are planning to provide access for free, what's the
point of joining something like boingo? Or I misunderstood?
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Dana Spiegel wrote:
There's no free reliable wifi anywhere in the market area, so this
question *now* is premature. I'll tell you that we both will lose a
large portion of our market if free reliable wifi becomes standard.
This is a misrepresentation, Alex. Right now
- there are absolutely no guarantees or
recourse for customers who use that service.
If 90% of your town was covered by free wifi provided by people like you,
trust me, they'd care.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo
that cannot
be done easily by outside company, and let competing internet providers
provide end-user service (such as internet bandwidth, email, customer
service, etc).
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http
.
Alex Pilosov| DSL, Colocation, Hosting Services
President | [EMAIL PROTECTED]877-PILOSOFT x601
Pilosoft, Inc. | http://www.pilosoft.com
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http
is about poor people not being able to afford internet,
provide monetary contribution to them, so they can buy access from anyone
else. Or not buy, if the intarweb isn't their thing. But, preserve the
choice of providers.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http
.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Joe Plotkin wrote:
role of government and our tax dollars in a way I hadnt thought of it
before. Which is: is there only one correct model for muni wifi?
Unfortunately, I think you want to have it both ways, which I do find
problematic. What I mean is this: if a
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor wrote:
Alex... hit me off list will ya :o) ...
Guys.. i dont know if this thing is a typo or not.. but the word around
the campfire is that verizon is looking into getting into the CABLE
market... they are in negotiations
that.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
it unless Vonage or internet based vendors are getting referral fees or
this is some regulatory setup any ideas?
a) FCC WNP regulations
b) VoiceWing
ktnxbye
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... VoiceWing being Verizon's VoIP solution, I doubt that. This is
the 1st I've even heard of it. As per Wireless Number Portability,
that's very interesting. Can landline #'s switch over to cell phones? If
so, that makes sense since many folks
line (UNE-P or resale for you
telecom geeks).
Yes you can.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# finding a really small DSL modem (are there any soekris-able PCMCIA ones
out there)
No.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http
doubt mlppp is enabled
there.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
can make you a soekris box that would do that. [and I'm sure many others
on this list would too]
Do you have a quantity in mind?
Also, if they are getting 110kbps per card, they are *lucky*.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman
a stable IP from, that won't
block port 80 and others, etc. And of course one that won't break my
wallet. :) This is for personal use. I'm not starting a business.
We do that, for 49.95$/mo, up to 3000/768 speeds with a static IP. No
ports blocked, etc, etc.
--
Alex Pilosov| DSL
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Anthony Townsend wrote:
yes it was announced about a year and a half ago. they required a $5000
(i think) deposit to bid, which pretty much ruled NYCwireless out from
the get-go.
this is the Parks Dept, like every other NYC agency, trying to whore
itself out to any
you recommend a voip and
isp combo i'm all ears. not looking for anything fancy or too tech.
easy of use is an issue. DSL Reports seems to favor packet 8.
I think we are on the fancy side, but hey, you get what you pay for ;)
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe
you recommend a voip and
isp combo i'm all ears. not looking for anything fancy or too tech.
easy of use is an issue. DSL Reports seems to favor packet 8.
I think we are on the fancy side, but hey, you get what you pay for ;)
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe
Depends. Doing g.729 its possible to do 15 lines in ~300kbit with tiny
degradation of voice quality. Doing 32kbit (plus 10kbit overhead) channels
(no noticeable degradation) you will fit all into ~700kbit.
-alex
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Jonathan Greene wrote:
I thought I read (maybe with Vonage
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Rob Kelley wrote:
only if its something that they can show has no commercial value
(otherwise the city would get sued by the people who
paid for franchises).
Anthony:
That's a hard one. What product of benefit to a community does not have
some commercial value?
Heya
Is there a place in the city that would sell N-female to MMCX (or N-female
to RP-TNC) adapter?
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
? Amplifier?
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
In addition to previous email:
If anyone here has a spare pair of high-gain antennas and/or amps, and is
willing to let me borrow it for a test (and if test works, for about a
month of use), please give me a shout.
Will pay 200$ for a month ;)
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http
Hi Alex
Have you looked into powerline ethernet adaptors? I bought a couple
Belkin units to experiment with in my building and they worked fine for
my needs; no software needed, I just plugged them in to the wall and
then plugged the CAT5 into them. That's it. As usual, there are some
number. The
resulting signal could, for example, pulse a relay to turn off power for
30 seconds.
Get a PC, remote reboot device and callerid-supporting modem. Done/done.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless
, and probably faster. Oh,
and feel free to refer my account (starfox) if you go this route.
When there's no copper - you are screwed one way or the other. The only
way VZ will pull new copper is by SDSL or T1 order.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http
Yes - that's why ghetto-rigged is not a good idea.
To do it proper, you need to buy flex/reflex chips (motorola over-the-air
paging protocol), and design your own circuit boards/etc. Not cheap. I
haven't seen 'pager as a module' for flex/reflex, but i did see POCSAG
modules (which interface to
.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
Yeah that is the idea, to use it for back hall. They are working on a
2.4 version. They hope it will come out by summer 2004
Back hall is where the fun is in the frat house.
backhaul is how you aggregate access circuits.
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http
the above, what will you say?
Sorry, your honour, I know that one of my customers is a criminal but I
have no idea which one, because I protect their privacy?
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http
colors together, your 3 6
will definitely not be on same pair.
=alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
yourself. If you don't have a way to identify your
customer, you can't very well be disabling their access for distributing
copyright-infringing material, can you?
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http
authentication record either.
Joe, what exactly do you do when you get a DMCA infringement notice?
What will you do when Secret Service knocks on your door and says that one
of your users emailed a threat to the president?
--
Alex Pilosov| DSL, Colocation, Hosting Services
President | [EMAIL
charge for 1$, or
face-to-face authentication by one of participating operators, or
similar).
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
places to go (and good times), please do
so.
I like Tunnel, Twilo and Vinyl...
Oh you meant wireless hot spots? Can't help you there :)
-alex
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http
Pawn them on ebay?
-alex
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Don Montalvo wrote:
...couldn't tell ya...all the wifi phone booths in hell's kitchen
have been cracked open to remove the devices...i can't for the life
of me think of how a homeless person will have use for a device like
that. ;)
Don
Conflict of interest between what and what, precisely?
Verizon's contract with NYC is to provide services to NYC government.
(Empire City Subway is a separate issue, but there's no conflict either).
-alex
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Don Montalvo wrote:
Wouldn't that be a serious conflict
You too can put up a phone booth (by buying sidewalk rights from the
city).
There are a lot of non-VZ phone booths around manhattan, mostly owned by
TCG (now ATT LS), setup near their fiber rights-of-way.
-alex
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Don Montalvo wrote:
Just wondering if there was a conflict
76 matches
Mail list logo
