From: bounce-122106516-3714...@list.cornell.edu
[mailto:bounce-122106516-3714...@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 2:55 PM
To: brian.whip...@gmail.com
Cc: Rick ; NYSBIRDS ; Shaibal Mitra
Subject: Re: [nysbirds-l] [NFBirds Report 3221] Snowy Owl, No
Well, for
Original Message-
>> From: bounce-122103624-3714...@list.cornell.edu
>> [mailto:bounce-122103624-3714...@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Shaibal
>> Mitra
>> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 10:22 PM
>> To: NYSBIRDS (NYSBIRDS-L@cornell.edu)
>> Subject: RE: [nysbirds-l] [NFBir
ssage-
> From: bounce-122103624-3714...@list.cornell.edu
> [mailto:bounce-122103624-3714...@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Shaibal
> Mitra
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 10:22 PM
> To: NYSBIRDS (NYSBIRDS-L@cornell.edu)
> Subject: RE: [nysbirds-l] [NFBirds Report 3221] Snowy Ow
lto:bounce-122103624-3714...@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Shaibal
Mitra
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 10:22 PM
To: NYSBIRDS (NYSBIRDS-L@cornell.edu)
Subject: RE: [nysbirds-l] [NFBirds Report 3221] Snowy Owl, No
As everyone so far has contributed in good faith, and given that this
listserv is de
Bay Shore
From: bounce-122103568-3714...@list.cornell.edu
[bounce-122103568-3714...@list.cornell.edu] on behalf of Rick [rc...@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 9:22 PM
To: 'Tim Dunn'; 'Frederick Kedenburg'
Cc: 'Michael Co
.
Suggestions?
Rick
From: bounce-122103507-3714...@list.cornell.edu
[mailto:bounce-122103507-3714...@list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Tim Dunn
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 8:37 PM
To: Frederick Kedenburg
Cc: Michael Cooper ; NYS BIRDS
Subject: Re: [nysbirds-l] [NFBirds Report 3221] Snowy Owl
I’m totally with Tim on this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 4, 2017, at 8:05 PM, Frederick Kedenburg
mailto:kedenb...@optonline.net>> wrote:
I don’t think Chris T-H needs to weigh in on this as it is a polite
conversation of an issue that we all know about.
Many of us have opinions that will not
I agree Fred, as to the context of the conversation. It’s not an easy issue for
birders and reasonable minds can differ on these issues.
I also have no problem with dealing with the “immigrant” swan population as
humanely as possible. To me, the most palatable solution would probably be to
pre
I don’t think Chris T-H needs to weigh in on this as it is a polite
conversation of an issue that we all know about.
Many of us have opinions that will not be changed. That is everyones right.
I have simply this one thing to say:
I know many out there wish to eliminate the Swans for what they bel
Well said Tim, but I think I hear the footsteps of
Chris T-H on the way, so I’m going to mention a bird in this post and “duck”
out of the way of the ban hammer!
Mike Cooper
Ridge LI NY
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 6:03 PM, Tim Dunn wrote:
>
> Fred and any others interested,
>
>
Fred and any others interested,
Two mute swans by you is no problem. Up to 65 can be seen on any given day on
Argyle Lake in Babylon. It is a pond that is less than 1/4 mile in
circumference. All other breeding waterfowl here have been eradicated by these
swans. Some migrant waterfowl use th
11 matches
Mail list logo