Hi,
> regarding missing license headers: would it be an option to run the check as
> part of the default build?
+1
This problem happened to me as well.
Locally, we need to build with the “rat” profile to check the license headers,
but because it disables the tests, we are forced to run
//github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-testing-paxexam
From: Robert Munteanu
Date: Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 17:44
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 16:38 +, Carlo Jelmini wrote:
> Up until now, I have used AEM Quickstart to ma
Re: Oak-it-osgi module
Hi Carlo
In the various security related modules I used
org.apache.sling.testing.osgi-mock to test the OSGi setup.
I never used oak-it-osgi as a base for tests.
Kind regards
Angela
____
From: Carlo Jelmini
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022
From: Carlo Jelmini
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 4:15 PM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Oak-it-osgi module
Hi,
I’m looking for a good place to add integration tests for the issue “Enable
configuration of more than one read-only mount in the composite node store“[0]
and I
Date: Monday, 17 January 2022 at 17:04
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module
Am 17.01.2022 um 16:15 schrieb Carlo Jelmini:
> Hi,
>
> I’m looking for a good place to add integration tests for the issue “Enable
> configuration of more than one rea
Hi,
I’m looking for a good place to add integration tests for the issue “Enable
configuration of more than one read-only mount in the composite node store“[0]
and I think the module “oak-it-osgi” is the best candidate.
However, I’m surprised to see that, with the current maven-failsafe-plugin
