Re: Value types supported by the MicroKernel

2012-03-22 Thread Stefan Guggisberg
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The MicroKernel interface currently says: supported property types: string, number that's outdated, it now says: string, number, boolean In addition there's explicit support for binary blobs. For oak-core

Re: Value types supported by the MicroKernel

2012-03-22 Thread Stefan Guggisberg
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: For oak-core (see OAK-33 [1]) we'd need a

Re: Value types supported by the MicroKernel

2012-03-22 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Can we turn that into a harder API contract, i.e. one that should hold true for any MK implementation? If not, we need to

Value types supported by the MicroKernel

2012-03-21 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, The MicroKernel interface currently says: supported property types: string, number In addition there's explicit support for binary blobs. For oak-core (see OAK-33 [1]) we'd need a bit more detailed definition of the supported value types. A few questions: 1) Are boolean values (the true