[Oak origin/1.4] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1227 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1227) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1227/ to view the results. Changes: [reschke] OAK-4964: UpdateOp.set("_id", ...) should do a

Re: Builds timing out: ubuntu-2 extremely slow

Thanks, looks better now. The builds work again on ubuntu-2. Michael On 20.10.16 6:37 , Pono Takamori wrote: This node had some hung jobs, so I've rebooted it and hopefully it can be speedier now. Cheers, -Pono from Infra On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Michael Dürig

Re: Builds timing out: ubuntu-2 extremely slow

This node had some hung jobs, so I've rebooted it and hopefully it can be speedier now. Cheers, -Pono from Infra On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Michael Dürig wrote: > > Hi, > > Our builds regularly time out when assigned to the ubuntu-2 slave. Is there > anything wrong

Oak 1.5.13 release plan

Hello team, I'm planning to cut Oak 1.5.13 on Monday 24th. If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration. Thanks Davide

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak Segment Tar version 0.0.16

[X] +1 Approve the release On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Francesco Mari wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 19 issues in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK/fixforversion/12338072 > > There are still some outstanding issues: >

Re: On adding new APIs

On 20.10.16 2:21 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Michael Marth wrote: ...So I have a proposal: when a new public API is added the developer should drop an email with subject tag [REVIEW] onto the dev list, so that others are aware and can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak Segment Tar version 0.0.16

[X] +1 Approve the release Davide

Re: On adding new APIs

On 20/10/2016 13:02, Michael Marth wrote: > developer should drop an email with subject tag [REVIEW] ok for the email, but it should point to a ticket in jira where the discussion would happen. Davide

Re: On adding new APIs

Hi, I would prefer C-T-R (commit, then review), because it reduces bureaucracy. Except for changes just before a major release (when there is little time to und or change things). +1 to [REVIEW] emails. In my view, this should include new configuration and new features. Basically all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak Segment Tar version 0.0.16

+1 2016-10-20 14:17 GMT+02:00 Michael Dürig : > > > On 20.10.16 2:08 , Francesco Mari wrote: >> >> [X] +1 Approve the release > > > Michael

[Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1226 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1226) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1226/ to view the results. Changes: No changes Test results: 16 tests failed. FAILED:

Re: svn commit: r1765583 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk: oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/api/jmx/ oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/property/strategy/ oak-cor

> -@Version("4.0.0") > +@Version("5.0.0") > @Export(optional = "provide:=true") > package org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.jmx; I think we could get away with increasing this to 4.1.0 if we can annotate QueryEngineSettingsMBean with @ProviderType. I.e. we don't expect API consumers to implement

Re: On adding new APIs

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Michael Marth wrote: > ...So I have a proposal: when a new public API is added the developer should > drop an > email with subject tag [REVIEW] onto the dev list, so that others are aware > and can > chime in if needed... The Oak team can also

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak Segment Tar version 0.0.16

On 20.10.16 2:08 , Francesco Mari wrote: [X] +1 Approve the release Michael

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak Segment Tar version 0.0.16

Hi, We solved 19 issues in this release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK/fixforversion/12338072 There are still some outstanding issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK/component/12329487 Staging repository:

On adding new APIs

Hi all, I had a discussion with Michael Dürig about adding new Oak-specific APIs for public consumption. There is a concern that these might be too “ad-hoc” and might come back to bite us later. OTOH I would not like to add too much process or ceremony. So I have a proposal: when a new public

[Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1225 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1225) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1225/ to view the results. Changes: [frm] OAK-4958 - Remove unused method from DataStoreTestBase

[Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1224 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1224) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1224/ to view the results. Changes: No changes Test results: 1 tests failed. FAILED: