[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.10

Hello Team, the vote passes as follows: +1 Julian Reschke +1 Amit Jain +1 Davide Giannella +1 Andrei Dulceanu +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Vikas Saurabh +1 Tommaso Teofili Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. -- Davide

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.7.10 released

The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --

Intent to backport: OAK-6878

Hello, I plan to backport the OAK-6878 to 1.6 branch today, so it’ll be included in the Monday release. It allows to set the S3DataStore configuration fields using a properties file. It’s requested by the customer - without this patch it’s impossible to set the cacheSize for the S3 migration.

Re: Intent to backport: OAK-6878

On 27/10/2017 13:39, Tomek Rękawek wrote: > Hello, > > I plan to backport the OAK-6878 to 1.6 branch today, so it’ll be included in > the Monday release. It allows to set the S3DataStore configuration fields > using a properties file. It’s requested by the customer - without this patch > it’s

Build fails at oak-lucene

Hi all, I am currently trying to build oak from master. When doing mvn clean install I get an error in the oak-lucene module. It looks like the referenced adobe granite parent pom is missing. I guess this error does not occur when someone builds using the Adobe vpn. So I think we need to publish

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 919 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #919) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/919/ to view the results. Changes: [frm] OAK-6829 - Make the configuration of NetworkErrorProxy immutable [frm] OAK-6829 - Let the

Re: Build fails at oak-lucene

On 2017-10-27 14:46, Davide Giannella wrote: On 27/10/2017 14:28, Christian Schneider wrote: Hi all, I am currently trying to build oak from master. When doing mvn clean install I get an error in the oak-lucene module. It looks like the referenced adobe granite parent pom is missing. I guess

Re: Build fails at oak-lucene

On 27/10/2017 14:28, Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi all, > > I am currently trying to build oak from master. When doing mvn clean > install I get an error in the oak-lucene module. > It looks like the referenced adobe granite parent pom is missing. I guess > this error does not occur when someone

Re: BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 919 - Failure

Fixed the test now with 1813536 Chetan Mehrotra On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #919) > > Status: Failure > > Check console output at

Re: BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 919 - Failure

Hi Chetan, there are more similar failures. The build then breaks for me at oak-upgrade. .e.g: [*INFO*] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.*Jcr2ToSegmentTest* [*ERROR*] *Tests **run: 2*, Failures: 0, *Errors: 2*, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.657 s* <<< FAILURE!* - in

Re: BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 919 - Failure

Oops ... Looks like this impacts whole build. Would look into that Chetan Mehrotra On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi Chetan, > > there are more similar failures. The build then breaks for me > at oak-upgrade. > > .e.g: > > [*INFO*] Running

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 921 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #921) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/921/ to view the results. Changes: [chetanm] OAK-6873 - UserInitializer should not use hard coded QueryIndexProvider Adapt

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 920 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #920) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/920/ to view the results. Changes: [thomasm] OAK-6807 Query Recorder Test results: 1 tests failed. FAILED:

Re: BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 919 - Failure

Now build should pass post 1813545 Chetan Mehrotra On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > Oops ... Looks like this impacts whole build. Would look into that > Chetan Mehrotra > > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Christian Schneider >

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 923 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #923) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/923/ to view the results. Changes: [thomasm] OAK-6875 Lucene index: the query read limit is ignored Test results: 46 tests

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 922 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #922) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/922/ to view the results. Changes: [thomasm] OAK-3371 Wrong evaluation of NOT clause: test case [reschke] OAK-6869: oak-http and

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 924 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #924) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/924/ to view the results. Changes: [chetanm] OAK-6873 - UserInitializer should not use hard coded QueryIndexProvider Have a

Re: [CompositeDataStore] Should we refactor AbstractDataStoreService and create AbstractDataStoreFactory?

Hi, I updated the PR today with AbstractDataStoreService and an implementation for it (FileDataStoreService). @Tomek (and anyone else) please take a look and see if this is heading in the direction you had in mind. -MR On October 26, 2017 at 4:20:56 PM, Matt Ryan (o...@mvryan.org) wrote: Hi,