hi all
recent the ContentSession interface got a new method
Blob createBlob(InputStream inputStream) throws IOException;
this there is no TODO comment associated with it i assume
that is intended to stay... however, it feels a bit odd to
me having that method on the content session interface
The purpose of that method is to allow the API consumer to create Blob
instances which are immediately streamed down to the BlobStore in the
Microkernel. This way the API consumer can control at what point
streaming takes place when setting values of Type.BINARY on a Tree: blob
instances
hi michael
thanks for the info
Note that createBlobd() is very much the same as the
getCoreValueFactory() method, which it replaced.
yes, i am aware of this... the reason why i don't like
the method on contentsession has nothing to do with the
'what-it-does' but rather the fact i IMO it
On 19.10.12 10:36, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi michael
thanks for the info
Note that createBlobd() is very much the same as the
getCoreValueFactory() method, which it replaced.
yes, i am aware of this... the reason why i don't like
the method on contentsession has nothing to do with the
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building ASF
Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/829
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: osiris_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source Stamp:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:04 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
BUILD FAILED: failed compile
Sorry about that, I already fixed the problem in revision 1400143.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As you may have noticed from my work in OAK-352, we now have pretty
clean and simple mechanism for constructing repositories with
different combinations of pluggable components. Here's a quick guide
on how to
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
However in the case of a move operation I think this would cause the above
test case to fail, since x.getParent() would then still point to the root.
Yes, the test case would need to be adapted. I filed OAK-391 [1] to
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for sharing this, good stuff! I think this write up would best go
into another .md file in /doc. WDYT?
Michael
On 19.10.12 16:25, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
As you may have noticed from my work in OAK-352, we now have pretty
clean and simple mechanism for constructing
