Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.13.6
On 2016-12-14 07:40, Julian Reschke wrote: A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.13.6 release is available at: ... Sorry - wrong mailing list.
[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.13.6
A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.13.6 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.13.6/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/jackrabbit-2.13.6/ The SHA1 checksum of the archive is 999f0d82091f751727e97c88f542c5dc5792bd36. A staged Maven repository is available for review at: https://repository.apache.org/ The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is: $ sh check-release.sh 2.13.6 999f0d82091f751727e97c88f542c5dc5792bd36 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.13.6. The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.13.6 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Best regards, Julian
Re: SegmentNodeStoreService vs. SegmentNodeStoreFactory
Technically SegmentNodeStoreFactory is superset. If no role is defined it can register a NodeStore directly instead of registering it as NodeStoreProvider Only downside with using factory way is that its tricky to override default OSGi config (something to be checked and confirmed) In general it would be good to have only factory mode ... just that we need to see if all required usage modes can be done with that or not Chetan Mehrotra On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Francesco Mari wrote: > After reviewing and applying the patch for OAK-4978, I found myself > wondering if we need to make a distinction between > SegmentNodeStoreService and SegmentNodeStoreFactory. IIUC, the only > difference between the two seems to be the presence of a "role" > configuration property. The SegmentNodeStoreService seems to be a > special case of SegmentNodeStoreFactory where the "role" property is > unspecified. Should we remove SegmentNodeStoreService in favour of > SegmentNodeStoreFactory?
SegmentNodeStoreService vs. SegmentNodeStoreFactory
After reviewing and applying the patch for OAK-4978, I found myself wondering if we need to make a distinction between SegmentNodeStoreService and SegmentNodeStoreFactory. IIUC, the only difference between the two seems to be the presence of a "role" configuration property. The SegmentNodeStoreService seems to be a special case of SegmentNodeStoreFactory where the "role" property is unspecified. Should we remove SegmentNodeStoreService in favour of SegmentNodeStoreFactory?
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.11
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.11 Regards Julian On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2016-12-12 13:05, Davide Giannella wrote: >> >> ... > > > [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.11 > > Best regards, Julian >
