Intent to backport OAK-6637

2017-09-20 Thread Chetan Mehrotra 
I would like to backport OAK-6637 which improves the resilience of
locking and ensures any exception should not cause the lock to be lost
preventing further index updates

Chetan Mehrotra

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 767 - Still Failing

2017-09-20 Thread Apache Jenkins Server 
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #767)

Status: Still Failing

Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/767/ to 
view the results.

Changes:
[adulceanu] OAK-6667 - Refactor StandbyDiff for better clarity and 
understandability

 

Test results:
3 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.shouldContainCustomInitializerContent

Error Message:
already shut down

Stack Trace:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: already shut down
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.upgradeRepository(RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.java:67)


FAILED:  
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.shouldContainUpgradeInitializedContent

Error Message:
Privilege definition with name 'test:privilege' already exists.

Stack Trace:
javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Privilege definition with name 'test:privilege' 
already exists.
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.upgradeRepository(RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.java:57)


FAILED:  
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.shouldReflectSourceAfterModifications

Error Message:
Privilege definition with name 'test:privilege' already exists.

Stack Trace:
javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Privilege definition with name 'test:privilege' 
already exists.
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.upgradeRepository(RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.java:57)

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 766 - Failure

2017-09-20 Thread Apache Jenkins Server 
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #766)

Status: Failure

Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/766/ to 
view the results.

Changes:
[frm] OAK-6193 - Implement a safe, responsive shutdown protocol in FileStore

 

Test results:
3 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.shouldContainCustomInitializerContent

Error Message:
already shut down

Stack Trace:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: already shut down
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.upgradeRepository(RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.java:67)


FAILED:  
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.shouldContainUpgradeInitializedContent

Error Message:
Privilege definition with name 'test:privilege' already exists.

Stack Trace:
javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Privilege definition with name 'test:privilege' 
already exists.
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.upgradeRepository(RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.java:57)


FAILED:  
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.shouldReflectSourceAfterModifications

Error Message:
Privilege definition with name 'test:privilege' already exists.

Stack Trace:
javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Privilege definition with name 'test:privilege' 
already exists.
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.upgradeRepository(RepeatedRepositorySidegradeTest.java:57)

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6685

2017-09-20 Thread Vikas Saurabh 
+1 for backport.

I've added a comment to the issue that we should probably also make
background update a little more resilient.

Thanks,
Vikas

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Marcel Reutegger
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to backport OAK-6685 to the maintenance branches. The fix is simple
> and I consider the risk as very low.
>
> Regards
>  Marcel

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6685

2017-09-20 Thread Matt Ryan 
+1


On September 20, 2017 at 7:41:08 AM, Marcel Reutegger (
mreut...@adobe.com.invalid) wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to backport OAK-6685 to the maintenance branches. The fix is
simple and I consider the risk as very low.

Regards
Marcel

Intent to backport OAK-6685

2017-09-20 Thread Marcel Reutegger 

Hi,

I'd like to backport OAK-6685 to the maintenance branches. The fix is 
simple and I consider the risk as very low.


Regards
 Marcel