Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0

2017-10-14 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 it makes sense. Tommaso Il giorno ven 13 ott 2017 alle ore 17:01 Matt Ryan ha scritto: > Hi, > > Makes good sense to me. Cutting the next release as a major version > reflects the high amount of change in dependencies that the downstream > should expect. > > -MR > > > On

BUILD FAILURE: Jackrabbit Oak - Build # 874 - Still Failing

2017-10-14 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Jackrabbit Oak (build #874) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/874/ to view the results. Changes: [reschke] OAK-6829: ExternalPrivateStoreIT/ExternalSharedStoreIT.testSyncBigBlob failures -