+1 it makes sense. Tommaso
Il giorno ven 13 ott 2017 alle ore 17:01 Matt Ryan <o...@mvryan.org> ha scritto: > Hi, > > Makes good sense to me. Cutting the next release as a major version > reflects the high amount of change in dependencies that the downstream > should expect. > > -MR > > > On October 13, 2017 at 8:58:38 AM, Angela Schreiber ( > anch...@adobe.com.invalid) wrote: > > hi > > given the fact that the m12n topic is quite an effort and has major > consequences for oak, i would like to propose that we discuss the option > of making the next stable release from trunk a 2.0 instead of just a next > 1.8. > > imho it would better reflect the changes if we compare it to a minor step > from 1.4 to 1.6. > > wdyt? > > kind regards > angela >
