Speaking as someone who is reasonably familiar with Kerberos and the
general concepts involved, I find both Microsoft/Kerberos technology
((constrained delegation/protocol transition) and the ws-trust text
horribly confusing and would recommend against all of the above as
examples of clarity.
I'm just catching up on this tread, but would appreciate an in-room
discussion on this topic that doesn't assume the adopted draft has the
agreed upon approach as I am not reading that there is consensus on that
approach in this thread at all.
Could we see presentations on Mike's draft and
Kathleen,
I agree that Brian’s approach covers the use case that drove my original draft
and effectively subsumes my approach.
My standing contention with the document as it stands is and has always been
that it’s lacking a general syntactical approach and it isn’t very OAuth-y. I
would love
] On Behalf Of Justin Richer
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:52 PM
To: Kathleen Moriarty
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Kathleen,
I agree that Brian’s approach covers the use case that drove my original draft
and effectively subsumes my approach.
My
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just catching up on this tread, but would appreciate an in-room
discussion on this topic that doesn't assume the adopted draft has the
agreed upon approach as I am not reading that there is consensus
] *On Behalf Of *Vivek
Biswas
-T (vibiswas - XORIANT CORPORATION at Cisco)
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* OAuth@ietf.org mailto:OAuth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf
-T (vibiswas - XORIANT CORPORATION at Cisco)
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* OAuth@ietf.org mailto:OAuth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All
...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com
Cc: oauth oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Stating specific action items resulting from the ad-hoc meeting in Dallas like
that suggests some clear
, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com
Cc: oauth oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Stating specific action items resulting from the ad-hoc meeting in Dallas
like that suggests some clear consensus was reached, which is not at all
: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com
Cc: oauth oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Stating specific action items resulting from the ad-hoc meeting
*Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Stating specific action items resulting from the ad-hoc meeting in Dallas
like that suggests some clear consensus was reached, which is not at all
the case. As I recall, several of us argued past one another for an hour or
so and decided
Campbell
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Yes unfortunately we haven’t made any progress on this since accepting Mike’s
first draft.
His proposal is basically for a new endpoint while Brian tired to fit it into
the existing token endpoint.
I think draft-ietf
Campbell
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Yes unfortunately we haven’t made any progress on this since accepting Mike’s
first draft.
His proposal is basically for a new endpoint while Brian tired to fit it into
the existing token endpoint.
I think draft-ietf
: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:13 AM
To: Brian Campbell
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Yes unfortunately we haven’t made any progress on this since accepting
Mike’s first draft.
His proposal
Bradley; oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Stating specific action items resulting from the ad-hoc meeting in Dallas like
that suggests some clear consensus was reached, which is not at all the case.
As I recall, several of us argued past one another for an hour or so
:* Monday, July 6, 2015 11:29 AM
*To:* Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com
mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com
*Cc:* oauth oauth@ietf.org mailto:oauth@ietf.org
*Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Stating specific action items resulting from the ad-hoc meeting in
Dallas like
...@microsoft.com; oauth oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
A natural usage of act-as or
impersonationhttp://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/impersonate
would suggest, to many people anyway, that the way you just used the terms is
reversed. The bold
,
-- Mike
From: Brian Campbell [mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: John Bradley; oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Stating specific action items resulting from the ad-hoc meeting in Dallas
like that suggests
]
*Sent:* Monday, July 6, 2015 2:33 PM
*To:* Anthony Nadalin tony...@microsoft.com
*Cc:* Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com; oauth oauth@ietf.org
*Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
A natural usage of act-as or impersonation
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us
)
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* OAuth@ietf.org mailto:OAuth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All,
I am looking to solve a use-case similar
] On Behalf Of Justin Richer
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 5:18 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
As it's written right now, it's a translation of some WS-* concepts into JWT
format. It's not really OAuth-y (since the client has to understand the token
format
Of *Vivek
Biswas
-T (vibiswas - XORIANT CORPORATION at Cisco)
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* OAuth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All,
I am looking to solve a use-case similar to WS-Security On-Behalf-Of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws
PM
*To:* OAuth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All,
I am looking to solve a use-case similar to WS-Security On-Behalf-Of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/v1.4/errata01/os/ws-trust-1.4-errata01-os-complete.html#_Toc325658980
with OAuth JWT Token
Biswas
-T (vibiswas - XORIANT CORPORATION at Cisco)
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* OAuth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All,
I am looking to solve a use-case similar to WS-Security On-Behalf-Of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/v1.4/errata01
- XORIANT CORPORATION at Cisco)
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* OAuth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All,
I am looking to solve a use-case similar to WS-Security On-Behalf-Of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/v1.4/errata01/os/ws
-exchange-01 is
about.
Cheers,
-- Mike
*From:*OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Vivek
Biswas
-T (vibiswas - XORIANT CORPORATION at Cisco)
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:20 PM
*To:* OAuth@ietf.org
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All
] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All,
I am looking to solve a use-case similar to WS-Security On-Behalf-Of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/v1.4/errata01/os/ws-trust-1.4-errata01-os-complete.html#_Toc325658980
with OAuth JWT Token.
Is there a standard claim which we can define
Hi All,
I am looking to solve a use-case similar to WS-Security
On-Behalf-Ofhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/v1.4/errata01/os/ws-trust-1.4-errata01-os-complete.html#_Toc325658980
with OAuth JWT Token.
Is there a standard claim which we can define within the OAuth JWT which
denote
Biswas -T
(vibiswas - XORIANT CORPORATION at Cisco)
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:20 PM
To: OAuth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Token on-behalf of Use case
Hi All,
I am looking to solve a use-case similar to WS-Security
On-Behalf-Ofhttp://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/v1.4/errata01/os
29 matches
Mail list logo
