Stephen,
I'm working on updating these drafts and as I look again at the text that's
in §5. Interoperability Considerations and the requirement in §3 Assertion
Format and Processing Requirements to compare these values using the Simple
String Comparison (absent an application profile specifying
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Thanks for your review and feedback, Stephen. Replies are inline below...
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
wrote:
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: No Objection
When responding, please
Hiya,
Mostly fine just a couple of notes.
On 16/10/14 20:28, Brian Campbell wrote:
Thanks for your review and feedback, Stephen. Replies are inline below...
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
wrote:
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
wrote:
Some stuff needs to be exchanged out-of-band for this to work.
Entity/issuer/audience identifiers are part of that. This need is
discussed
in the Interoperability Considerations at
