dastew and tamacchant answered this off-line. After an interchange with Dave,
it appeared that use of the AOL browser could be causing the download to
terminate abnormally. After I switched to the MS I/E browser things worked
well. It is finished downloading and installing, and I'm reading
mikegockel wrote:
> I'm a newbie. I started at the Octave site for instructions on
> getting Octave downloaded and installed, and got overwhelmed by the
> choices and some of the notation. If I state where I'm starting and
> what I hope to do, if someone could give me a trail through the
> do
Hello
Please see below
http://wiki.octave.org/wiki.pl?OctaveForWindows
GNU Octave, version 3.0.3 (i686-pc-msdosmsvc) or Octave (3.0.2) Forge MinGW
Windows will be recommendes to use.
If you would like to use GUI interface, please see the part of QtOctave in the
above page.
Regards
Tatsuro
I'm a newbie. I started at the Octave site for instructions on getting Octave
downloaded and installed, and got overwhelmed by the choices and some of the
notation. If I state where I'm starting and what I hope to do, if someone
could give me a trail through the document list that gets me on t
Citi, Luca wrote:
> Dear David Bateman,
> I am an octave user. I write you because you committed a change to the
> filtfilt function lately.
> I found a problem with filtfilt. I posted a message to the octave-dev mailing
> list on Nov 3rd.
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name
Michael Goffioul wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Jaroslav Hajek
> wrote:
> >
> > Why not? There is no problem writing an interface to a proprietary
> > library, provided that the interface itself will be GPL'ed.
> > Writing such an interface certainly does not make the library a
> > deriv
Hi,
lør, 13 12 2008 kl. 20:04 +0900, skrev Dongik Shin:
> I found a bug in subpixel refinement of local maxima by parabolic
> interpolation.
> The amount of shift to each direction is same to that to the first
> direction.
>
> I suggest a solution:
I've made the suggested change. This will be in
Hi
I found a bug in subpixel refinement of local maxima by parabolic
interpolation.
The amount of shift to each direction is same to that to the first
direction.
I suggest a solution:
in line 82,
w = 1;
ws = w*cumprod([1; s(:)]); ## newly added
in line 89,
indminus1 = max(ind-ws(d),1); ## repla
