On 2008@17:21, Carn� Draug wrote:
> 2011/11/8 Michele Martone :
> > On 2008@15:15, Carnļæ½ Draug wrote:
> ...
> >> If you give me your SF account name I can give you write access to the
> >> repo so everyone else can look into it and chip in.
> >
2011/11/8 Michele Martone :
> On 20111108@15:15, Carnļæ½ Draug wrote:
>> On 8 November 2011 12:00, Michele Martone wrote:
>> > I am an enthusiastic (occasional) Octave user since some good 5 years.
>> > This is my first post to this mailing list; here I would like to
On 2008@16:37, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM, c. wrote:
> >
> > On 8 Nov 2011, at 16:07, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> This looks good.
> >> I am just giving my coin in regard to the licencing.
> &
On 2008@15:15, Carn� Draug wrote:
> On 8 November 2011 12:00, Michele Martone wrote:
> > I am an enthusiastic (occasional) Octave user since some good 5 years.
> > This is my first post to this mailing list; here I would like to
> > propose a contrib
On 8 November 2011 13:11, Alberto Cuadrado wrote:
> Hello Jeff,
>
> thank you for answering. And Carnë, thank you too.
>
> I don't realize what's the problem with the number of coefficients at the
> moment. Please, let me think about it.
>
> However, you are right about that sentence about Matlab'
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM, c. wrote:
>
> On 8 Nov 2011, at 16:07, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This looks good.
>> I am just giving my coin in regard to the licencing.
>> GPLv3 is a non-commercial licence (people can not use this code in
>> programs user needs to pay for)
>> LGPL is
On 8 Nov 2011, at 16:07, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
> Hi,
> This looks good.
> I am just giving my coin in regard to the licencing.
> GPLv3 is a non-commercial licence (people can not use this code in
> programs user needs to pay for)
> LGPL is very similar but allows commercial use.
> Before dec
On 8 Nov 2011, at 15:41, Michele Martone wrote:
> As far as I know, LGPL is more appropriate for libraries, while GPL for full
> programs.
> For this reason, the "librsb" source archives can be distributed separately
> under the LGPL (it's slightly more permissive than GPL, as far as I
> understa
On 8 Nov 2011, at 15:52, Michele Martone wrote:
> Yes indeed: I did not give you yet instructions for librsb :)
>
> It's at http://home.rzg.mpg.de/~mima/librsb.tar.gz
>
> Once unpacked, the intended "happy path" is:
>
> ./configure # many configure options, not all straightforward
> make
> m
On 8 November 2011 12:00, Michele Martone wrote:
> I am an enthusiastic (occasional) Octave user since some good 5 years.
> This is my first post to this mailing list; here I would like to
> propose a contribution to Octave-forge.
>
> [...]
>
> For all these reasons I ask you, the Octave/Octave-Fo
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Michele Martone
wrote:
> On 20111108@15:38, Carlo de Falco wrote:
>> On 8 Nov 2011, at 15:12, Carlo de Falco wrote:
>> ...
>> Also, when I try to install with "pkg install sparsersb.tgz "
>> I get a n error for a missing heade
On 2008@15:38, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> On 8 Nov 2011, at 15:12, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> ...
> Also, when I try to install with "pkg install sparsersb.tgz "
> I get a n error for a missing header:
>
> >> pkg install sparsersb.tgz
> skipping line
&g
Michele,
This sounds indeed like a nice contribution!
I might try to help check the code but currently
I really have very little spare time, so if someone else
jumps in it would defenitely make things happen faster.
Anyway here is a few quick comments:
I see in the DESCRIPTION file:
License:
On 2008@15:12, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> Michele,
>
> This sounds indeed like a nice contribution!
>
> I might try to help check the code but currently
> I really have very little spare time, so if someone else
> jumps in it would defenitely make things happen faster.
On 8 Nov 2011, at 15:12, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> Michele,
>
> This sounds indeed like a nice contribution!
>
> I might try to help check the code but currently
> I really have very little spare time, so if someone else
> jumps in it would defenitely make things happen faster.
>
> Anyway here
Hello Jeff,
thank you for answering. And Carnë, thank you too.
I don't realize what's the problem with the number of coefficients at the
moment. Please, let me think about it.
However, you are right about that sentence about Matlab's normalization.
Matlab's help on fir1 says so. But in fact that
Dear Octave/Octave-forge developers,
I am an enthusiastic (occasional) Octave user since some good 5 years.
This is my first post to this mailing list; here I would like to
propose a contribution to Octave-forge.
I am writing now after a three years PhD experience, during which I've
designed, ana
On 8 November 2011 09:00, Paul Dreik wrote:
> 2011-11-07 23:33, Juan Pablo Carbajal skrev:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Paul Dreik wrote:
>>> Yes, should be there too. I tested on ubuntu 11.10 (octave
>>> 3.2, gcc 4.6.1) and it compiles without , so it does not seem
>>> to be necessary but
2011-11-07 23:33, Juan Pablo Carbajal skrev:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Paul Dreik wrote:
>> Yes, should be there too. I tested on ubuntu 11.10 (octave
>> 3.2, gcc 4.6.1) and it compiles without , so it does not seem
>> to be necessary but it should definitely be there, as free is used.
>>
19 matches
Mail list logo
