- Original Message -
> From: Sergei Steshenko
> To: Lukas Reichlin ; Octave Forge
>
> Cc: help-octave
> Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2012 10:45 PM
> Subject: Re: control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload
> - Original Message -
>> From: Lukas Reichlin
>> To: Octave
On 6/5/12 10:14 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 6/5/12 10:00 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> On 6/4/12 10:16 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>>> On 04.06.2012, at 22:46, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>>>
On 6/3/12 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>> On 6/3/
On 6/5/12 10:00 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 6/4/12 10:16 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>> On 04.06.2012, at 22:46, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/3/12 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>
>>
On 6/4/12 10:16 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
> On 04.06.2012, at 22:46, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> On 6/3/12 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>>> On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> in the changelog among other thin
On 05.06.2012, at 11:35, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 6/5/2012 11:06 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>> On 05.06.2012, at 10:28, marco atzeri wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/5/2012 7:16 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>>>
Marco, Alexander
Could it be that you are using BLAS from ATLAS and LAPACK from
On 05.06.2012, at 12:06, c. wrote:
>
> On 5 Jun 2012, at 11:34, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>
>> Well, the sign IS relevant. But the two state-space models are equivalent if
>> you can find a diagonal transformation matrix T with entries -1 and 1 such
>> that
>>
>> Aexp = T \ Aobs * T
>>
On 5 Jun 2012, at 11:34, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
> Well, the sign IS relevant. But the two state-space models are equivalent if
> you can find a diagonal transformation matrix T with entries -1 and 1 such
> that
>
> Aexp = T \ Aobs * T
> Bexp = T \ Bobs
> Cexp = Cobs * T
>
On 6/5/2012 11:06 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
On 05.06.2012, at 10:28, marco atzeri wrote:
On 6/5/2012 7:16 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
Marco, Alexander
Could it be that you are using BLAS from ATLAS and LAPACK from Reference LAPACK
3.4.1?
What I meant was using no ATLAS at all (and no Acceler
On 05.06.2012, at 07:31, c. wrote:
>
> On 4 Jun 2012, at 23:56, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
>> Eh no, not quite. We usually look at the errors and decide. But here we
>> are talking about a factor of 1 between expected and actual result.
>> That's a bug.
>
> As far as I understand from Lukas' exp
On 05.06.2012, at 10:28, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 6/5/2012 7:16 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>
>>
>> Marco, Alexander
>>
>> Could it be that you are using BLAS from ATLAS and LAPACK from Reference
>> LAPACK 3.4.1?
>> What I meant was using no ATLAS at all (and no Accelerate/Veclib). There is
>>
On 6/5/2012 7:16 AM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
Marco, Alexander
Could it be that you are using BLAS from ATLAS and LAPACK from Reference LAPACK
3.4.1?
What I meant was using no ATLAS at all (and no Accelerate/Veclib). There is a BLAS included in
Reference LAPACK 3.4.1. You have to specify "make
On 4 Jun 2012, at 23:56, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Eh no, not quite. We usually look at the errors and decide. But here we
> are talking about a factor of 1 between expected and actual result.
> That's a bug.
As far as I understand from Lukas' explanation, the sign in the result is not
relevant
On 04.06.2012, at 22:46, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 6/3/12 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>>> On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
Hello,
in the changelog among other things I've read the following:
"
Add a
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 07:19:14PM +0200, c. wrote:
> Lukas,
> Thanks for your great work!
>
> I ran the tests on OSX 10.6 with Apple's vecLib and get the failures below [1]
> which you already said should be considered as "no problem".
>
> On 4 Jun 2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote:
> > I expe
On 6/3/12 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>> On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> in the changelog among other things I've read the following:
>>>
>>> "
>>> Add a few remarks to the help text regarding the severity of failing
On 04.06.2012, at 19:19, c. wrote:
> Lukas,
> Thanks for your great work!
>
> I ran the tests on OSX 10.6 with Apple's vecLib and get the failures below [1]
> which you already said should be considered as "no problem".
>
> On 4 Jun 2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote:
>> I expect a package test
- Original Message -
> From: Lukas Reichlin
> To: marco atzeri
> Cc: Sergei Steshenko ; Octave Forge
> ; help-octave ;
> Alexander Hansen
> Sent: Monday, June 4, 2012 9:16 PM
> Subject: Re: control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload
>
>
> On 04.06.2012, at 18:56, ma
On 04.06.2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 6/4/2012 5:37 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>> On 03.06.2012, at 21:45, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I would not call your ATLAS defective. For various reasons, results from
>> ATLAS and Reference BLAS/LAPACK can differ. Remember that ATLAS
Lukas,
Thanks for your great work!
I ran the tests on OSX 10.6 with Apple's vecLib and get the failures below [1]
which you already said should be considered as "no problem".
On 4 Jun 2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote:
> I expect a package test function to behave reasonable correctly
> for most
On 6/4/2012 5:37 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
> On 03.06.2012, at 21:45, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
>
>
> I would not call your ATLAS defective. For various reasons, results from
> ATLAS and Reference BLAS/LAPACK can differ. Remember that ATLAS stands for
> _Automatically_ _Tuned_ Linear Algebra Soft
On 03.06.2012, at 21:45, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: Lukas Reichlin
>> To: Octave Forge ; Carnë Draug
>>
>> Cc: help-octave
>> Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2012 6:11 PM
>> Subject: control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've
On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> in the changelog among other things I've read the following:
>>
>> "
>> Add a few remarks to the help text regarding the severity of failing tests.
>> ".
>>
>> Please see my test failures below
On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> in the changelog among other things I've read the following:
>
> "
> Add a few remarks to the help text regarding the severity of failing tests.
> ".
>
> Please see my test failures below - do they mean my linear algebra stuff
> (e.g. ATL
- Original Message -
> From: Lukas Reichlin
> To: Octave Forge ; Carnë Draug
>
> Cc: help-octave
> Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2012 6:11 PM
> Subject: control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've just posted control-2.3.51 (SVN Revision 10559) in the pac
On 3 June 2012 16:11, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
> I've just posted control-2.3.51 (SVN Revision 10559) in the package forum
> [1]. Please upload it to the server.
Done.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live eve
Hi all,
I've just posted control-2.3.51 (SVN Revision 10559) in the package forum [1].
Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the NEWS file [2].
The notice for
http://octave.sourceforge.net/
June 3, 2012
control-2.3.51 released
Best regards
Lukas
[1]
http://sourceforge.
26 matches
Mail list logo
