Re: [OctDev] doubled pgmres in the linear-algebra package

2011-11-02 Thread Carnë Draug
2011/11/2 Carnë Draug : > 2011/10/21 c. : >> On 21 Oct 2011, at 19:28, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> Hmm you think it's really worth keep it in octave-forge if the >>> difference in speed is that small? >> >> Your're right I'm not sure it's worth the effort of maintaining an extra >> function, so it'

Re: [OctDev] doubled pgmres in the linear-algebra package

2011-11-02 Thread Carnë Draug
2011/10/21 c. : > On 21 Oct 2011, at 19:28, Carnë Draug wrote: >> Hmm you think it's really worth keep it in octave-forge if the >> difference in speed is that small? > > Your're right I'm not sure it's worth the effort of maintaining an extra > function, so it's OK if you remove it > >> And i

Re: [OctDev] doubled pgmres in the linear-algebra package

2011-10-21 Thread c.
On 21 Oct 2011, at 19:28, Carnë Draug wrote: > Hmm you think it's really worth keep it in octave-forge if the > difference in speed is that small? Your're right I'm not sure it's worth the effort of maintaining an extra function, so it's OK if you remove it > And if we were to remove it (a

Re: [OctDev] doubled pgmres in the linear-algebra package

2011-10-21 Thread Carnë Draug
2011/10/21 c. : > On 21 Oct 2011, at 13:13, Carnë Draug wrote: >> 2011/10/20 c. : >>> the C++ version has the same functionality but is (very slightly) faster so >>> you might want to keep it. >> >> If it has the same functionality but works faster, why not use it in >> octave-core too? >> Is ther

Re: [OctDev] doubled pgmres in the linear-algebra package

2011-10-21 Thread c.
On 21 Oct 2011, at 13:13, Carnë Draug wrote: > 2011/10/20 c. : >> On 20 Oct 2011, at 17:13, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> I noticed that you have implemented 2 versions of the pgmres function >>> in the linear-algebra package, one in C++ and another in octave. >>> Should we remove one of them? If so, wh

Re: [OctDev] doubled pgmres in the linear-algebra package

2011-10-21 Thread Carnë Draug
2011/10/20 c. : > On 20 Oct 2011, at 17:13, Carnë Draug wrote: >> I noticed that you have implemented 2 versions of the pgmres function >> in the linear-algebra package, one in C++ and another in octave. >> Should we remove one of them? If so, which? > > the m-file version was included in Octave-co

Re: [OctDev] doubled pgmres in the linear-algebra package

2011-10-20 Thread c.
On 20 Oct 2011, at 17:13, Carnë Draug wrote: > Hi Carlos > > I noticed that you have implemented 2 versions of the pgmres function > in the linear-algebra package, one in C++ and another in octave. > Should we remove one of them? If so, which? > > Carnë the m-file version was included in Octav

[OctDev] doubled pgmres in the linear-algebra package

2011-10-20 Thread Carnë Draug
Hi Carlos I noticed that you have implemented 2 versions of the pgmres function in the linear-algebra package, one in C++ and another in octave. Should we remove one of them? If so, which? Carnë -- The demand for IT netw