Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-04-09 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Thank you for Michael Regards --- Michael Goffioul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have complete misled the matter yesterday. > > I found it was very easy this morning. > > I would like to cry

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-04-09 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I have complete misled the matter yesterday. > I found it was very easy this morning. > I would like to cry how silly I was !!! :-( > > BTW: The following Patch is OK for src/Makefile for mingw/cygwin.

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-04-09 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello This is a minor correction. Regards, Tatsuro --- Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I have complete misled the matter yesterday. > I found it was very easy this morning. > I would like to cry how silly I was !!! :-( > > BTW: The following Patch is OK for src/Makef

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-04-09 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello I have complete misled the matter yesterday. I found it was very easy this morning. I would like to cry how silly I was !!! :-( BTW: The following Patch is OK for src/Makefile for mingw/cygwin. *** Makefile.orgThu Apr 10 08:28:11 2008 --- MakefileThu Apr 10 08:31:30 2008 *

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-04-08 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Sorry. I have tried this morning, but it has not work well yet. Please wait a while. Regards Tatsuro --- Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > --- David wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:44:33AM +0900, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > > Hello Michael > > > > Every one

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-04-06 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello --- David wrote: On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:44:33AM +0900, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > Hello Michael > > Every one waits you to comes back. > I understand that this is a mere file name handling problem of file. > Hi, David. I would like to octave in windows platform treat problem in the >

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-04-06 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Michael Every one waits you to comes back. I understand that this is a mere file name handling problem of file. Hi, David. I would like to octave in windows platform treat problem in the sameframe work. I think you are already proceed to this issue on mingw. Can I consider the patch to th

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-04-06 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael>This import lib is automatically generated by MSVC when there > Michael>are exported symbols. This is not the case for MinGW, you need some > Michael>additional compile flags. > > You need some additional com

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-29 Thread dbateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA-2 wrote: > > After one day rest, my condition rather better so that I can think about > this with cool head. > Some good news :-) > Cannot src/Makefile in the fixed package come back before for mingw/cygwin > pat without affective for > Unix build ? > > My previous patch

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-29 Thread dbateman
Michael Goffioul-2 wrote: > > I think you need to create the import library for fixed.oct (something > like > libfixed.a). This import lib is automatically generated by MSVC when there > are exported symbols. This is not the case for MinGW, you need some > additional compile flags. > > Michael

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-29 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello David After one day rest, my condition rather better so that I can think about this with cool head. Cannot src/Makefile in the fixed package come back before for mingw/cygwin pat without affective for Unix build ? My previous patch works correctly. Using previous the Makefile that I made

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-29 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:48 AM, dbateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The idea was to try and link against the fixed.oct file rather than a > separate library. That is what Michael did under MSVC, so I suspect there is > some way to do it under mingw/cygwin. How do you tell gcc that "oct" is a

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-28 Thread dbateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA-2 wrote: > > Main problem is that new Makefile by you did not give a > liboctave_fixed.dll.a > so that the link seeme to be failed. > The idea was to try and link against the fixed.oct file rather than a separate library. That is what Michael did under MSVC, so I suspect th

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-28 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello I felt bad in the morning so that I canceled today's work. In the afternoon my situaion rather became better so I tried the be below. I have down loaded the SVN today by langus (an alias comand by me to set locale to US for avoiding character traslation mistakes) svn co https://octave.svn

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Sorry for my delay will slow things. If other people will not appear, I will come back to this topic approximately a week later. However I strongly hope that some power users will appear on the octave for windows maintaining activities. Regards Tatsuro --- David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-27 18:05]: > >> then the error disappears but I get: > >> > >> warning: autoload: `./fixed.oct' is not an absolute file name > >> > That error seems to indicated that this is not Octave 3.0.0 or later. Nope, I am positive here: $ octave --ver

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-27 12:41]: > > >> If we can do the same under mingw, cygwin and msvc, then I'd suggest the >> attached patch.. [snip] >> > > Thanks, your patch works on Debian for me, at least for the build/install. > However, I am st

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-27 12:41]: > If we can do the same under mingw, cygwin and msvc, then I'd suggest the > attached patch.. [snip] Thanks, your patch works on Debian for me, at least for the build/install. However, I am stiil having a problem at run time: octave:1>

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > Hello > > Although I vote this issuse here again, I cannot have an enough time to > contribute it > at the moment. I have an immediate work on my university activity. > Thefore I cannot committe the isusse at the moment. > Please give a moment to try to build and test

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Although I vote this issuse here again, I cannot have an enough time to contribute it at the moment. I have an immediate work on my university activity. Thefore I cannot committe the isusse at the moment. Please give a moment to try to build and test what David have advised. Are there

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:26 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ok, then if you can link against the oct-file, then that doesn't change >> anything except the need to add "-L../src -lfixed" when building the >> example oct-files.. I committed another

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:26 PM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, then if you can link against the oct-file, then that doesn't change > anything except the need to add "-L../src -lfixed" when building the > example oct-files.. I committed another patch to do that.. Tatsuro, > you'

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The problem I had with cygwin is that at the time the example oct-files >> were build it wanted the symbols to be resolved, and thus linked against >> fixed.oct. If the OCTAVE_FIXED

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem I had with cygwin is that at the time the example oct-files > were build it wanted the symbols to be resolved, and thus linked against > fixed.oct. If the OCTAVE_FIXED_API macro doesn't address that issu

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, but can we do the same with cygwin and mingw? >> > > I guess you can. oct-files are just DLL's, whether you compile with MSVC, > mingw or cygwin. Moreover, mingw and cygwin expo

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but can we do the same with cygwin and mingw? I guess you can. oct-files are just DLL's, whether you compile with MSVC, mingw or cygwin. Moreover, mingw and cygwin export all symbols by default, so the OCTAVE_FIXED_

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, but that breaks the use of the fixed type in other oct-files.. See >> the examples directory in the fixed package.. I don't really understand >> Windows builds.. Might it be possib

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, but that breaks the use of the fixed type in other oct-files.. See >> the examples directory in the fixed package.. I don't really understand >> Windows builds.. Might it be possib

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but that breaks the use of the fixed type in other oct-files.. See > the examples directory in the fixed package.. I don't really understand > Windows builds.. Might it be possible to flag the OCTAVE_API macro in >

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It doesn't have to be.. Under Linux the symbols are exported from the >> oct-file and you can resolve the symbols at run-time from the oct-file >> itself.. Therefore there is no need fo

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't have to be.. Under Linux the symbols are exported from the > oct-file and you can resolve teh symbols at run-time from the oct-file > itself.. Therefore there is no need for an external library file under >

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello David Thanks for your explanation. Regards Tatsuro --- David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > > Hello > > > > Please see the long discussions about the fixed package. > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Creating-library-file-in-fixed-package-for-mingw-to1456293

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > Hello > > Please see the long discussions about the fixed package. > > http://www.nabble.com/Creating-library-file-in-fixed-package-for-mingw-to14562936.html#a14562936 > > In the discussion Michael wrote, > My modidication of mingw/cygwin is based on the following Michael'

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Please see the long discussions about the fixed package. http://www.nabble.com/Creating-library-file-in-fixed-package-for-mingw-to14562936.html#a14562936 In the discussion Michael wrote, My modidication of mingw/cygwin is based on the following Michael's advise. The following the 3rd optio

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * dbateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-22 05:49]: > > >> Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson wrote: >> >>> Hey .. it seems that the fixed package fails to build on debian with >>> the following error messages: >>> >>> >> I believe its fixed in the SVN. This was a fail

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* dbateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-22 05:49]: > Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson wrote: > > > > Hey .. it seems that the fixed package fails to build on debian with > > the following error messages: > > > > I believe its fixed in the SVN. This was a failed attempt for a fix for the > cygwin/mingw pl

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-22 Thread dbateman
Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson wrote: > > Hey .. it seems that the fixed package fails to build on debian with > the following error messages: > I believe its fixed in the SVN. This was a failed attempt for a fix for the cygwin/mingw platform that had other consequences.. D. -- View this message i

[OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-22 Thread Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson
Hey .. it seems that the fixed package fails to build on debian with the following error messages: /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '--out-implib=liboctave_fixed.dll.a' /usr/bin/ld: use the --help option for usage information collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [liboctave_fixed.dll] Erro