Re: [OctDev] Trouble with jhandles--installation issue?

On 10 August 2010 13:11, Martin Helm wrote: > Am Dienstag, 10. August 2010 19:44:15 schrieb Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso: >> 2010/8/10 Judd Storrs : >> > 2010/8/10 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso >> > >> >> I just noticed that there is a packaging request for Debian

Re: [OctDev] Trouble with jhandles--installation issue?

On 9 August 2010 01:33, Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Jonathan Kimball > wrote: >> I have another computer that is working correctly. It has Octave 3.0.1, >> which I installed from an Octave Forge package some time ago.  It includes >> java 1.2.4 and jhandles 0.3.3.  

Re: [OctDev] Trouble with jhandles--installation issue?

2010/8/10 Judd Storrs : > 2010/8/10 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso >> I just noticed that there is a packaging request for Debian for >> jhandles, and I *did* mean to get around to it. >> >> Is it impossible to work around the GPL issue? Is there any code that >>

Re: [OctDev] wiki.octave.org: Use (workaround) users.isr.ist.utl.pt/~etienne/cgi-bin-etienne/wiki.pl

On 9 October 2010 19:35, wrote: >   Unfortunately, this problem goes beyond my web competence, so if > anyone has an idea of how this problem has arisen, please let us know. If you need help next time, I can help. I've configged my share of httpd's and LAMPs in general in my day. --

Re: [OctDev] rpm packaging of octave packages

On 21 December 2010 16:50, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm starting to take a look at creating a standard method of building rpms > of octave packages for Fedora.  I'm starting with the old octave-forge > package as a starting point. Did you see these already? http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-oct

Re: [OctDev] is memory leak of figure

On 30 March 2011 21:32, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > On 03/30/2011 09:57 PM, Ben Abbott wrote: > >>> Should I propose a new feature for gnuplot that will cause an exit if an >>> interactive window is closed? >> >> I don't think that is a good idea. >> >> (1) There is no synchronous communication betwe

Re: [OctDev] PulseAudio "backend" for PulseAudio

On 12 July 2011 15:58, Søren Hauberg wrote: > Currently, audio handling does not work very well in Octave and it is > great to see new people taking their stabs at getting this into shape. I > think working with pulseaudio on Linux most likely makes sense. I do not > know if we should try to find

Re: [OctDev] Revived: Bug report: COM errors in Windows package

On 13 July 2011 10:15, Philip Nienhuis wrote: > Hi Michael: > > ([email protected] cc'ed) > > Michael Goffioul wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Philip Nienhuis   >> wrote: >>> Michael Goffioul wrote: The backtrace is weird, it looks like polymorphism isn't use, a

[OctDev] Fwd: Bug in __getlegenddata__.m

Can anyone confirm or deny this Savannah problem? I haven't ever seen it. -- Forwarded message -- From: Max Date: 13 July 2011 15:14 Subject: Re: [OctDev] Bug in __getlegenddata__.m To: Søren Hauberg Cc: [email protected] On 12.07.2011 22:55, Søren Hauberg wrote

Re: [OctDev] Reporting bugs

2011/7/21 Carnë Draug : > some e-mails to the mailing list reporting bugs (and some with > patches or suggested changes), seem to never have a response. I > myself have a couple of such e-mails, marked as unread, for when I > have the time to do something about them. I feel that these bugs > will j

Re: [OctDev] Matlab compatibility

On 22 July 2011 14:55, Claudio Olmi wrote: > Is Octave development targeting full Matlab compatibility? Almost always, yes. We do not attempt bug-for-bug compatibility unless replicating Matlab bugs is crucial. > If yes, is it okay to point out (or fix) all the functions that do > not match the

Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge bugs in the tracker?

2011/7/24 c. : > > On 24 Jul 2011, at 17:12, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> 2011/7/24 Thomas Weber : >>> For the record, I disagree with a lot of things that people here >>> seem to take for granted: >> >> My bad. Forget I said anything. There

[OctDev] Octave-Forge code swarm

I made another code swarm, this time for Octave-Forge's repository: http://jordi.platinum.linux.pl/movies/forge-swarm-2011.ogg Should play on Firefox or Chrome out of the box or the VLC media player. Another code swarm, for Octave itself since October 2008: http://jordi.platinum.linux

Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge bugs in the tracker?

2011/8/1 Philip Nienhuis : > Lastly I'm fairly happy with the -let's say: fairly relaxed- svn > setup of OF. I find the stricter workflow of Mercurial a bit > daunting Huh, that's odd. I feel exactly the opposite way. I find hg gives me a lot more freedom try out stuff, to move patches, to keep my

Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge bugs in the tracker?

On 7 August 2011 05:41, Søren Hauberg wrote: > Has it been determined if it is easy to move bugs between > Savannah trackers? Yes, it is. I'm not sure what sort of access level is necessary, but you can move bugs around. I see a "reassign this item" thing at the bottom of bug reports that lets me

[OctDev] [bug #34010] octave-symbolic installed but not working

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #34010 (project octave): Sigh... The symbolic package is unmaintained, and even if it were maintained, it's not a core Octave package, supposedly maintained by a different team than the present one to which you are reporting the bug. Nobody in Ubuntu, as far as I know,

[OctDev] Bugfix (or update) for signal package

25,6 +25,9 @@ ## 1983. ## Author: Paulo Neis +## 2011-08-14: Updated call to fminbnd to correspond to new version in +## Octave core -- Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso + function ws=__ellip_ws(n, rp, rs) ## ## @@ -34,7 +37,7 @@ ql0=int(1); q0=int(2); x=n*ql0/q0; -kl=fminbnd('__ellip_ws_min

Re: [OctDev] http://wiki.octave.org/wiki.pl?CategoryUserInterface: broken link

011/8/14 Frederick Finkelstein : > Hi, > > the link > > https://github.com/jacobdawid/Quint > > seems to be broken. No alternative found. This is the alternative: https://bitbucket.org/jordigh/gnu-octave We're working on integrating this into Octave itself. With some luck, it should be the

[OctDev] Reminder: Second Octave code sprint

Save the date: September 3, 2011 at 10:00 EST (UTC -05:00), we will be having our second Octave code sprint: http://www.octave.org/sprint.html First one was very fun: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Code-Sprint-Results-td3672698.html Hope to see you there for round 2! - Jordi G.

Re: [OctDev] matlab incompatibility: mex CFLAGS=... unsupported

On 24 August 2011 15:35, Kris Thielemans wrote: > [suggestions to improve mkoctfile] I had similar thoughts not long ago. See this thread: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/I-think-I-quot-broke-quot-mkoctfile-for-3-4-1-td3608378.html In particular, notice what jwe said at the end. There

Re: [OctDev] Octave fails to draw on first plot

On 26 August 2011 09:35, Dov Kruger wrote: > Octave 3,2,4 is failing to plot the first time on 64 bit windows 7 on HP > 630s with Intel graphics. Do you have oct2mat installed? - Jordi G. H. -- EMC VNX: the world's simp

[OctDev] Octave code sprint this Saturday!

Reminder! We're having our second code sprint this Saturday: http://octave.org/sprint.html It should be fun, come and mingle while we write tests for Octave. All you need is a working Octave installation and working knowledge of the Octave language. No other experience necessary. - Jordi G.

Re: [OctDev] problems to start octave

On 31 August 2011 11:20, robson Paul wrote: > recently i downloaded the octave 3.4.2 > but i can not start it. > after  the promt and inserting pkg install octave-3.4.2.tar.gz the message > this file does not exist. > what can i do? Er... pkg install is for installing Octave packages, after Oct

[OctDev] Final reminder: Code sprint tomorrow!

Just a last reminder that tomorrow is our code sprint in IRC! http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/sprint.html Hope to see you there! - Jordi G. H. -- Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a wo

Re: [OctDev] differences with matlab in control package

Hola. :-) On 6 September 2011 07:58, Jordi Burguet Castell wrote: > There are a few differences from matlab in the behavior of the control > package, that bite me when running some codes. I don't know if they > exist by design or it would be nice to make them disappear. Almost always, difference

Re: [OctDev] Bugfix (or update) for signal package

On 8 September 2011 11:00, Carnë Draug wrote: > 2011/8/14 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso : >> Patch for signal package. I'm not sure if the first hunk should go there. >> >> Could I get write access to the 'Forge packages? I promise to be good >> and ask first if

Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge bugs in the tracker?

2011/9/8 Carnë Draug : > On 8 September 2011 22:50, c. wrote: >> On 8 Sep 2011, at 23:39, Carnë Draug wrote: >> >>> If we do stay in sourceforge, then we >>> should at least start using its bug tracker (which some users do use >>> to report bugs but no one checks. There must be a way to have a mai

[OctDev] [bug #34260] bwdist macro igiving incorrect result on x86_64 systems

Update of bug #34260 (project octave): Status:None => Octave Forge Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Sigh... You're repo

[OctDev] ocframe for adoption?

How about this package for adoption as an Octave-Forge package? http://ocframe.sourceforge.net/ I might attempt the adoption myself if someone else doesn't want to do it. - Jordi G. H. -- Doing More with Less: The N

Re: [OctDev] [PKG Specfun] Function submission

On 15 September 2011 10:08, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > Dear all, > > I have added to the features tracker a small set of functions that I > think they could go into the specfun package. > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3409993&group_id=2888&atid=352888 > Below is a much bett

Re: [OctDev] [PKG Specfun] Function submission

2011/9/16 Juan Pablo Carbajal : > 1. Is it ok if I keep the name "multinomExp" for the function or is > there a naming convention in octave (I like camelCase)? Almost no Octave functions use CamelCase or camelCase. Certainly none in core do. Matlab sometimes does this (e.g. onCleanUp), particularl

Re: [OctDev] [PKG Specfun] Function submission

editorial decisions, I think I do want my name on this thing. Thank you for that. ;-) HTH, - Jordi G. H. %% Copyright (c) 2011 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso %% Copyright (c) 2011 Juan Pablo Carbajal %% %%This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify %%it under the terms

Re: [OctDev] octave-forge: nnet: plenary documentation not located

On 19 September 2011 17:18, J A Stephen Viggiano wrote: > I am interested in using the nnet package from force. We have of course > found the function reference. Unfortunately, this is not sufficient for > using the package. Why not? What more do you need to know? Can you mention specific gaps in

Re: [OctDev] sub2ind for Upper triangular matrices

On 24 September 2011 17:33, JuanPi wrote: > Hi > > >From a discussion in the IRC channel concerning this post > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/242711/algorithm-for-index-numbers-of-triangular-matrix-coefficients/3148414#3148414 > > JordiGH improved the algorithm and include it in sprandsym, th

Re: [OctDev] Reading Nastran .pch files

2011/9/27 Philip Nienhuis : > Second: I noted that on ML Central the author (Bilen) posted similar code. > As on ML Central only BSD licenses are accepted, and now the code has a > GPL licence, perhaps in the header a comment should be made about dual > licensing? NB: AFAIU, BSD and GPL are not fu

Re: [OctDev] Reading Nastran .pch files

On 27 September 2011 16:10, Philip Nienhuis wrote: > So, what BSD version does TMW require? This is a bit of a history lesson, but there are a bunch of "BSD licenses". The MIT and X licenses are sometimes also confused for the BSD licenses, because their wording is similar. The first one had an a

[OctDev] Matlab Central's license and terms of use

Not a lawyer either, etc. On 28 September 2011 13:17, Joe Vornehm Jr. wrote: > The Mathworks cannot sue anyone for copyright infringement for using > your code, no matter where they got it from. No, but they can attempt to take action for breaking the terms of use of their website. I don't know

Re: [OctDev] Octave symbolic package

On 18 October 2011 05:20, Daniel McInnes wrote: > I have been trying to install the package "symbolic-1.0.9.tar.gz " in > octave-3.4.3 but am getting error messages about the function > "symbols.cc". See below for the octave terminal output: > > octave:1> pkg install ~/Downloads/symbolic-1.0.9.tar

Re: [OctDev] Use octave in classical programming language

On 19 October 2011 11:15, Johan Beke wrote: > I'd like to use my octave functions for calculation in an other > project. However, there is not such a gui package as with matlab This may "soon" change. Maybe next year. We're using Qt now for creating a native GUI for Octave, including the uifoo fu

Re: [OctDev] Use octave in classical programming language

On 19 October 2011 12:13, Johan Beke wrote: > From: [email protected] >> On 19 October 2011 11:15, Johan Beke wrote: >> > I'd like to use my octave functions for calculation in an other >> > project. However, there is not such a gui package as with matlab >> >> This may "soon" change. Maybe nex

[OctDev] FYI: Octave being used for gigantic online course

As you may already know, Octave is being used for the online machine learning class given at Stanford: http://www.ml-class.org/course/resources/index?page=course-info This is probably the biggest exposure Octave has ever had all at once amongst students. Expect to see students enrolled in th

Re: [OctDev] FYI: Octave being used for gigantic online course

2011/10/20 Doug Stewart : > 2011/10/20 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso >> >> As you may already know, Octave is being used for the online machine >> learning class given at Stanford: >> >>     http://www.ml-class.org/course/resources/index?page=course-info >> &

Re: [OctDev] Help install

On 27 October 2011 18:33, Luke Higdon wrote: > Im having trouble downloading octave. I cant install it and attached > is the message it gives me when i try and run octave. my system is a > 64 bit nd not sure if that would cause a problem with your software. You seem to not have attached anything.

Re: [OctDev] Authorization to add package

On 10 November 2011 11:42, Henrik Alsing Friberg wrote: > I have been developing on a Octave-to-MOSEK Optimization Interface > for a while, and have reached a point where I would like to put it > on Octave-forge and share the package with other users of MOSEK. > Though free academic and trial lice

Re: [OctDev] Stable poles handed to "filter" can result in unstable filter

On 11 November 2011 03:01, Jerry wrote: > There is a bug in filter which is part of the signals add-on package > which, when given stable poles, can generate an unstable impulse > response. I don't know much about the topic, but is the following bug related? https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?34

Re: [OctDev] "librsb"+"sparsersb" packages proposal for octave-forge

On 12 November 2011 18:18, Carlo de Falco wrote: > > On 12 Nov 2011, at 16:04, c. wrote: > >> >> On 12 Nov 2011, at 12:17, Alexander Barth wrote: >> >>> Dear Filippone, >>> >>> Also an iterative parallel solver would be very useful for me. >>> Currently, I'm using either a direct solver (the \ ope

Re: [OctDev] Installing packages in Mac OS 10.7 Lion

On 14 November 2011 16:41, McCue-Weil, Leigh wrote: > I had some issues with package installation after upgrading to Lion > that was all traceable (eventually) to the make file.  I've attached > here the relevant make file in hopes of saving someone else a > headache. Yeah, this was a known regre

Re: [OctDev] octproj installation problem

On 14 November 2011 22:20, Frank Willett wrote: > I'm having a problem installing the package on my Mac. > > Mac OS X 10.7.2 > Octave 3.4.0 > >>>pkg install octproj-1-1.0.2.tar > mkoctfile: unrecognized argument -fPIC I broke mkoctfile on 3.4.0, but it got fixed in later versions. Are you able to

Re: [OctDev] Authorization to add package

2011/11/17 Henrik Alsing Friberg : > With respect to legal matters of the OctMOSEK package, I can assure > you that everything is in order. OctMOSEK will be distributed under > the Lesser GPL license, with explicit permissions from the copyright > holder (me) to allow dependence on the GPL-incompat

[OctDev] Non-free packages in CRAN

Hello. This is in relation to the discussion below: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CAPHS2gwmxJGF9Cy8%3DSEGasQcVRg_Lqu-ndCdVhO-r1LJsRQGuA%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=octave-dev If this is the wrong place to discuss this issue, I would be thankful for a redirection t

Re: [OctDev] [Rd] Non-free packages in CRAN

2011/11/18 Simon Urbanek : > I think you are misunderstanding a few things here. First, "R" > doesn't endorse anything - it is a program, It is also an organisation and that organisation has a website. Someone is responsible for the contents of that website and the views espoused in it. Saying tha

Re: [OctDev] [Rd] Non-free packages in R-Forge

I'm sorry about the tone of my previous email. Let me try again in a cleaner way. The problem is: R or the organisation behind R via its infrastructure seems to be endorsing R-Forge, and R-Forge is hosting at least one project whose sole purpose is to link R with non-free software. This looks like

Re: [OctDev] future of non-free in octave-forge

On 18 November 2011 12:51, Robert T. Short wrote: > I understand that.  If it isn't available from the website, at the very > least it creates an obstacle to using it, and therefore is a suppression > of freedom. That obstacle is meant to discourage the creator of the non-free software and to enc

Re: [OctDev] future of non-free in octave-forge

On 18 November 2011 14:14, Robert T. Short wrote: > Martin's point makes a lot of sense.  However, I still don't see the > problem with hosting non-free software in the forge project. > > Personally, I think the notion that non-free software is somehow bad is > ludicrous. You really don't think t

Re: [OctDev] future of non-free in octave-forge

2011/11/18 Martin Helm : > Am 18.11.2011 20:39, schrieb Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso: >> You really don't think that license managers, software patents, NDAs, >> non-competition agreements, hidden source code, secret algorithms, and >> forbidding your users from doing w

[OctDev] Deleting/deprecating apply.m

The apply.m function in the miscellaneous package seems to be a poor reimplementation of arrayfun and cellfun. Any objections to deleting this function? Or a suggestion to properly deprecating it? - Jordi G. H. -- All the

Re: [OctDev] [Rd] Non-free packages in CRAN

2011/11/20 Joris Meys : > I am very much pro open source and I have my own ideological ideas > about a lot of things. I am personally not so much in favour of open source. Open source is ok, but it's not enough. Free (vrije) is a lot more important than open. > And as much as I'm pro open source,

Re: [OctDev] Authorization to add package

2011/11/26 Carnë Draug : > As for releases, since the likely users of the package will also be > users of the MOSEK library, I'm sure they would expect it to be > released first on your own website too. Despite this, I'd like to > encourage you to still release the package under a free license. Le

Re: [OctDev] Deleting/deprecating apply.m

On 28 November 2011 12:48, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 19 November 2011 21:41, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> The apply.m function in the miscellaneous package seems to be a poor >> reimplementation of arrayfun and cellfun. Any objections to deleting >> this function? Or a s

Re: [OctDev] Deleting/deprecating apply.m

On 28 November 2011 13:45, Paul Dreik wrote: > 2011-11-28 19:39, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso skrev: >> On 28 November 2011 12:48, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> On 19 November 2011 21:41, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso >>> wrote: >>>> The apply.m function in the m

[OctDev] Help with wiki, please

Joanna Cheng has spent considerable effort porting this page from the old wiki: http://octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=Code There's lots of really outdated stuff there... "With a recent version of the OctaveForge installed (version 20030602 or later),"... I think OF contributors would know b

Re: [OctDev] Help with wiki, please

2011/11/30 Andy Buckle : > 2011/11/30 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso : >> Joanna Cheng has spent considerable effort porting this page from the old >> wiki: >> >>    http://octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=Code >> >> There's lots of really outdated stu

Re: [OctDev] Help with wiki, please

On 30 November 2011 11:35, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 30 November 2011 16:12, Etienne Grossmann wrote: >> I'm not sure about removing pages, but maybe you can just add a big >> "obsolete" sign at the top, so no-one ports it to the new wiki? > > Ok. I always assumed it was needed admin rights. But no

Re: [OctDev] Error in __scatter__.m code

On 4 December 2011 08:06, Frank Willett wrote: > I looked through the developer list email archive and didn't find > this problem listed so, I thought I should submit it. > > In version 3.4.3 obtained with Macports (fink) on my Mac at line 200 > of __scatter__.m the line is: > >        for i = 1:

Re: [OctDev] [PATCH] fix colored scatter plot

On 4 December 2011 09:31, Clemens Buchacher wrote: > The patch below fixes a problem with the following use of > scatter(): I believe I have addressed this already: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?34936 - Jordi G. H. --

Re: [OctDev] GPC wrapper for octave - being removed from octave-forge

2011/12/5 Carnë Draug : > On 5 December 2011 15:43, Toby Howard wrote: >> On 05/12/2011 15:22, Carnė Draug wrote: >>> Of course, we see releasing the GPC library under a free software >>> license as the ideal solution, and if that ever happens we will >>> gladly accept the package back in the pro

Re: [OctDev] ind2sub and sub2ind

On 9 December 2011 09:56, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > What is the status of ind2sub and sub2ind extension to triangular matrices? > > Are we going to extend ind2sub and sub2ind or we just add ind2sub_tril > and sub2ind_tril (and unvech) to the linear-algebra package? I've been lazy/busy about do

Re: [OctDev] bug in deriv.m (optim package)

n 22 December 2011 01:10, c. wrote: > It seems any code you insert in your posts disappears, I don't know > why, but it is impossible to help if we do not see the code. Looks like a Nabble bug. If you click on the URLs at the bottom of his emails and read it from Nabble, you can read the code. -

Re: [OctDev] Fwd: K means

On 22 December 2011 07:33, Arno Onken wrote: > Should kmeans be backward compatible with 3.2.4? I don't think it should be. And Søren's fix to replace [~, foo] = bar() with [tmp, foo] = bar() isn't quite equivalent. Although I don't think min does this, a function can know if an output parameter

Re: [OctDev] Fwd: K means

2011/12/22 Søren Hauberg : > tor, 22 12 2011 kl. 09:24 -0500, skrev Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso: >> On 22 December 2011 07:33, Arno Onken wrote: >> >> > Should kmeans be backward compatible with 3.2.4? >> >> I don't think it should be. And Søren's fix

[OctDev] [bug #35163] 'Cluster' function not present in octave

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #35163 (project octave): Divya, to be clear: you reported this feature request in Octave core but it should be discussed in Octave-Forge's mailing lists (http://octave.sf.net). Either way, the function should be written, and we would appreciate it very much if you were ab

[OctDev] [bug #35191] aviread does not obey video time scale

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #35191 (project octave): To the Octave-Forge project: while we handle the merging of the two projects, please consider this bug report. ___ Reply to this item at: _

Re: [OctDev] to contribute code in octave

On 30 December 2011 11:39, vaseem ahmed khan wrote: > thanks for your reply i will be contributing soon in this open source > project .i mean will i get name in credits or stuff(a letter of appreciation > etc ) which i can refer to somebody that i am contributor of this project. There is no forma

Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge Statistics Function Submission

On 2 January 2012 11:27, Kyle N Winfree wrote: > The second function performs a principal component > analysis akin to that provided by SPSS. Were you unaware of this other function when you wrote that? http://octave.sourceforge.net/statistics/function/princomp.html - Jordi G. H. -

Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge Statistics Function Submission

2012/1/2 Kyle N Winfree : > On 01/02/2012 01:36 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> >> On 2 January 2012 11:27, Kyle N Winfree  wrote: >>> >>> The second function performs a principal component >>> analysis akin to that provided by SPSS. >> >

[OctDev] [bug #35245] tf2zp and zp2tf missing in control-2.2.3

Update of bug #35245 (project octave): Status:None => Octave Forge Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: This looks like a pr

[OctDev] Who uses Octave?

Who uses Octave? We haven't asked this question in a while, so I'm curious to see if answers have changed significantly recently. It would be much appreciated if you could answer here in the mailing list or edit our wiki page on the matter: http://www.octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=Who_Uses

Re: [OctDev] removing zscore and strtrim that were moved to core

2012/1/19 Arno Onken : > On 01/19/2012 05:38 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >> I have just removed the strtrim funtion from the string package. >> >> I want to do the same for the zscore function from the statistics >> package. Is there any reason not to so? > > Removing the zscore function from the statis

Re: [OctDev] install fltk - package is missing

2012/1/22 Ioannis Papaioannou : > The ubuntu11.1's repository doesn't include a package for fltk. Sure it does: http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/libfltk1.1-dev HTH, - Jordi G. H. -- Try before you buy = See our ex

Re: [OctDev] Octave for Win 7 64 bit

On 22 January 2012 00:49, sonali gandhi wrote: > I am unable to find the Compatible version of Octav with My system. > > I have Window's 7  with 64 bit Processer. Try these: http://sourceforge.net/projects/octave/files/Octave_Windows%20-%20MinGW/Octave%203.4.3%20for%20Windows%20MinGW%20Inst

[OctDev] [bug #35360] margin.m error: `Ts' undefined near line 300 column 62 for discrete systems

Update of bug #35360 (project octave): Status:None => Octave Forge Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: This looks like a pr

Re: [OctDev] Installing communication package for octave on OS x Lion

On 25 January 2012 11:35, OYEDAPO OLUFEMI wrote: > Hi, i seem to have been struggling for 2 days now. i have installed > octave version 3.4.0 for Mac Os x and it is running properly togther > with gnuplot. But my problem is i cannot run a script file (.*m > files). The error is it does not unders

Re: [OctDev] Installing communication package for octave on OS x Lion

2012/1/25 Marius Schamschula : > > 2012/1/25 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso : >> On 25 January 2012 11:35, OYEDAPO OLUFEMI >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, i seem to have been struggling for 2 days now. i have installed >>> octave version 3.4.0 for Mac Os x and it is runn

[OctDev] OctConf 2012: Invitation and call for abstracts

We have confirmed scheduling of an Octave conference for users and developers on July 16-20 in Montréal, Canada: http://www.octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=OctConf_2012 There will be several sessions in course. The first two days are dedicated to users, setting up with Octave and the basics o

[OctDev] Adding a link to OctConf from the Octave-Forge page?

I want to advertise OctConf from the Octave-Forge download page, somewhere near the top. Would this be OK? - Jordi G. H. -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning libr

Re: [OctDev] Adding a link to OctConf from the Octave-Forge page?

On 6 February 2012 15:48, c. wrote: > > On 4 Feb 2012, at 15:15, Carnë Draug wrote: > >> On 1 February 2012 21:29, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >>> I want to advertise OctConf from the Octave-Forge download page, >>> somewhere near the top. >>>

Re: [OctDev] Cell array iteration à la Smalltalk (Ruby?)

On 14 February 2012 08:52, Dr. Alexander Klein wrote: > I've finally managed to complete a number of functions that all > iterate over cell arrays and perform some action with cellfun. They > can be used for sorting out or finding elements (reject, select, > detect), These all seem like very tri

Re: [OctDev] Cell array iteration à la Smalltalk (Ruby?)

On 14 February 2012 10:35, Dr. Alexander Klein wrote: > >> accumulating results of repeated function evaluations (inject_into), > > > > accumarray? > Will this do something like > inject_into (@(x, y){x{:},rand(y)},num2cell(1:10),{}) No, I suppose I misunderstood what you meant with "accumulate

Re: [OctDev] Cell array iteration à la Smalltalk (Ruby?)

On 14 February 2012 10:55, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 14 February 2012 10:35, Dr. Alexander Klein > wrote: >> >> accumulating results of repeated function evaluations (inject_into), >> > >> > accumarray? > >> Will this do something like >

[OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

As part of our application for Google Summer of Code 2012 application, http://octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=GSoC_2012_application we ought to create a good-looking suggestion page for students that says what projects are good for students and who might mentor them: http://octave.org/wi

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

On 14 February 2012 17:58, Michael Goffioul wrote: > 2012/2/14 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso : >> As part of our application for Google Summer of Code 2012 >> application, >> >>    http://octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=GSoC_2012_application >> >> we ought to cr

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

2012/2/14 c. : > > On 14 Feb 2012, at 23:15, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> As part of our application for Google Summer of Code 2012 application, >> >>    http://octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=GSoC_2012_application >> >> we ought to create a good-lo

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

2012/2/15 Juan Pablo Carbajal : > I was reading the application. What about adding, under the question > What steps will you take to encourage students to interact with your > project's community before, during and after the program? > Depending on their interests and code submitted, students will

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

2012/2/15 c. : > > On 15 Feb 2012, at 16:53, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> Sure. Do you want to edit the wiki yourself to record this change? >> That's why it's a wiki, so it's fast and easy to edit by anyone. > that's OK, do I need a password to

Re: [OctDev] New releases of NaN- and TSA - toolbox

On 16 February 2012 02:29, Alois Schloegl wrote: > If you are tired of these nagging warnings, ask the developers of octave > to fix it. And I do not mean turning off the warning on shadowing > functions, but to implement the NaN-skipping behavior within the > existing core functions. NaN-skippin

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

Hi, Lukas. 2012/2/16 Lukas Reichlin : > On 14.02.2012, at 23:15, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> Note that I think we should also consider Octave-Forge projects. >> Please add Octave-Forge projects to the wiki as you deem appropriate. > I do have an idea for an Octave-F

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

2012/2/16 Ben Abbott : > My impression is some significant work is needed to accommodate > octave packages that depend upon libraries that Octave does not. > Perhaps this is another good project for GSoC? I think we have indeed already proposed these projects in the page: http://octave.org/w

[OctDev] [bug #35546] imresize produces memory exhausted error

Update of bug #35546 (project octave): Status:None => Octave Forge Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: This looks like a pr

Re: [OctDev] Google Summer of Code 2012: Call for projects and mentors

2012/2/16 Nir Krakauer : > I added my name to the numerical section and proposed another small > possible project. Excellent! I removed my name from the Numerical section and added it to the GUI section so that at least each general subject area has a potential mentor. I repeat that mentoring is

Re: [OctDev] New releases of NaN- and TSA - toolbox

2012/2/17 Alois Schloegl : > On 02/16/2012 01:52 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> I think it's ok to change the meaning of "NaN" for statistical >> convenience, but it's not a solution to use it in this way if you're >> solving a PDE and yo

  1   2   3   >