A related issue however is the apparent lack of ownership over the wiki.
In terms of ownership, EveryCity is providing free hosting of various bits of
OpenIndiana physical infrastructure, but it's down to the OpenIndiana project
to determine who has ownership. There is a gulf here that nobody
Hi Randy,
Your best bet is to mail the illumos mailing list - none of the illumos
developers hang out on the oi-dev mailing list, this list is for distribution
work (i.e. packaging etc).
To test the patch on that issue, you'd have to rebuild illumos-gate and install
the resulting packages.
I'm not exactly sure. I've been using a UNIX-like operating systems for the
past 15 years personally and professionally in one form or another. I've
followed the free and open source movement for as long. I've always wanted to
contribute to a FOSS project but I've never had the time. Now, I
I never agreed with SFE shipping packages to the system namespace. Conflicts
and a general mess was inevitable.
They should have shipped to /opt/sfe or similar.
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:39:10 -0400
From: g...@genashor.com
To: a...@rsu.ru;
Hi Jim,
You're pretty much right on all of that - github.com/illumos/illumos-gate is
the main source for illumos.
Some OI stuff has made its way onto https://github.com/openindiana
However much of the legacy OI stuff is still on http://hg.openindiana.org
illumos-gate build instructions should
test
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Hey Alexander,
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:23:25 +0400
From: a...@rsu.ru
Hello.
It looks like mod_perl 2.0.8 for Apache 2.4 requires threaded perl. Do I
understand correctly that after rebuilding perl with -Duseithreads we
have to rebuild all perl 5.16-dependent binary modules (luckily,
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:59:04 +0400
From: a...@rsu.ru
snip
Good day.
I've been working on updates to several packages in /hipster which are
older than in /dev.
This work is necessary to allow /dev - /hipster updates.
Current status is shown here:
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:42:53 +0100
From: joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
snip
Well it would be great if some people at Illumos would not try to dictate
things but signal that there is an interest for a collaboration.
illumos is collaborative. In the past year there has been around 50
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:23:51 +
From: keith.wesolow...@joyent.com
snip
But I guess that's just me. Bluntly, leading with OI or treating it as
special is thoroughly and uncompromisingly insane. Pretending that, in
2014 no less, achieving desktop application parity with 1997 GNU/Linux
is
From: darth.seri...@gmail.com
snip
Thank you all for your response. I am driving you to re-think. It is
my personal dream to see our community finally take off and overcome
this heritage of missing collaboration from Sun in illumos and
OpenIndiana.
With all due respect Seth, you don't
Picciano___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
--
Alasdair Lumsden
http
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
--
Alasdair Lumsden
http://www.everycity.co.uk
EveryCity Managed Hosting
Studio 18 Bluelion Place
237 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PU
general: 020 7183 2800
support
/**mailman/listinfo/oi-devhttp://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
--
Alasdair Lumsden
http://www.everycity.co.uk
EveryCity Managed Hosting
Studio 18 Bluelion Place
237 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PU
general: 020 7183 2800
support: 020 7183 2801
email: a...@everycity.co.uk
Every City Limited
--
Alasdair Lumsden
http://www.everycity.co.uk
EveryCity Managed Hosting
Studio 18 Bluelion Place
237 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PU
general: 020 7183 2800
support: 020 7183 2801
email: a...@everycity.co.uk
Every City Limited
Registered in England and Wales, No. 5689474 Registered Office: Roper
Yard
@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
--
Alasdair Lumsden
http://www.everycity.co.uk
EveryCity Managed Hosting
Studio 18 Bluelion Place
237 Long Lane, London, SE1 4PU
general: 020 7183 2800
support: 020 7183 2801
email: a...@everycity.co.uk
Every City Limited
Hi Adam,
On 10/ 1/12 07:42 PM, Adam Števko wrote:
URL: https://www.illumos.org/issues/2324
Changeset:
https://bitbucket.org/xenol/oi-build-2324/changeset/e4324e058d735b541e1603ba97840b49cc407d9c
To sum up, oracle removed one patch, which was accepted by upstream. Package
can be compiled by
On 04/09/2012 23:45, g...@genashor.com wrote:
I've cleaned up and updated isc-dhcp to 4.2.4-R1. This already has the
updates provided by Oracle so I removed the patches which are not
required. I also removed duplicate items in the p5m file and fixed the
Makefile so the BIND sub-module gets built
On 09/09/2012 22:12, Adam Števko wrote:
Bump, anyone else?
LGTM!
I'll ship it to oi-build shortly.
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On 06/09/2012 20:27, Ken Gunderson wrote:
As for Alasdair having resigned as project lead, I would politely ask
if we could prevail upon him to re-don his lead hat for this one last
action. Why? In short; I feel he, likely more than anyone, has the
community's trust.
Hi Ken,
Sure I
On 07/09/2012 06:07, garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote:
There have been technical disagreements, and I've pointed out that there has
been in the past what I think represents a lack of clear vision for OI. But
that's *my* opinion, and I don't speak for illumos in this regard. (Nor can I
-- or
Hi Nick,
On 05/09/2012 18:49, Nick Zivkovic wrote:
Someone thought it would be a good idea to have a unified build system
across consolidations.
I think it's a pretty good idea to standardize on one build system.
I'm merely asking which one would be preferred by the community
(assuming the
On 05/09/2012 19:49, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The buildsystem for sfw is a nightmare:
- It only works if the whole set of tools has already been
installed in /usr on the compiling system before with exactly
the same version as the one that is going to be compiled.
On 05/09/2012 21:12, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Correct. Userland was designed from the ground up for IPS, since that was the
only packaging system in use when it was created.
Nexenta enhanced their fork of userland to support generating .deb
packages, so adding SVR4 probably wouldn't be too
On 05/09/2012 21:22, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
What do you suggest as a better replacement for this?
Oh it's easy - you strip most of them out after the file is generated.
Very easy to do with a post-install sed rule in the build recipe.
The bulk of them are pointless optimisations that aren't
On 05/09/2012 21:36, Andrew Stormont wrote:
These sorts of scripts are just broken. What it really should do is check the
value of CC before adding any compiler specific flags. Patching it to do that
would be my preferred way of solving the problem.
That works too.
The thing is they're
On 05/09/2012 21:58, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alasdair Lumsden alasdai...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that you missunderstand the problem.
The main issue is that the build system linked against /usr instead of linking
against something like: /home/user/proto/usr
userland-gate still links against
I've actually realised it would be really useful if there was a single
document explaining all this stuff, a kind of In the beginning there
was... style walk through of how things came to be.
I'll try to write one over the next few weeks and put it on the wiki, as
it would probably help new
Hi All,
I have committed libcaca to oi-build.
Cheers,
Alasdair
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
(Moving this to oi-dev)
On 27/05/2012 16:47, Jim Klimov wrote:
2012-05-27 4:15, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
As project lead I can tell you that we won't be doing SPARC
unless someone comes along and takes ownership of that project,
and we definitely won't ever be doing SVR4 packaging as long
On 26 May 2012, at 17:46, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
sysidtool (where this lives) is not part of illumos-gate. Its a part of
OpenIndiana. I'm having trouble locating the sources they used for this.
I'm not entirely certain the source for it *is* open. Evidently it was part
of the installer
Hi All,
I have a rather large changeset for review:
https://bitbucket.org/alasdairlumsden/illumos-userland-2682/compare/..illumos/illumos-userland
This abstracts a large amount of unnecessary common autoconf code out. The key
files are make-rules/configure.mk and make-rules/shared-macros.mk
I
FYI - location info for the hackathon.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com
Date: 21 May 2012 15:12:13 CEST
To: userl...@lists.illumos.org
Subject: [userland] hackathon info
Reply-To: userl...@lists.illumos.org
The hackathon will take place May 23rd at
Hi All,
I need to book flights for this as time is running out and I still don't
really have enough information in order to choose dates and times - can
someone please confirm:
1. What day the hackathon is on (22nd?)
2. What time of day the hackathon is (all day? just the evening?)
3. What
On 10 May 2012, at 01:41, Bayard Bell wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Gordon Ross gordon.w.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com
wrote:
It also lets us add $(WS_TOP)/archives to .hgignore and no longer have to
put up with
On 10 May 2012, at 00:42, Bayard Bell wrote:
I think this is better than setting ARCHIVE_MIRROR, which may be
useful for other purposes--it's even more handy for managing our
source archive if you can populate what's current with a global gmake
download to one directory and then rsync that to
Hi Jeff,
On 10 May 2012, at 04:46, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
I've been a bit too lazy about this, so at least I'll let you guys know
about a couple of things I've done for my test repo. Feel free to take them
and get them integrated:
Great! Thanks for posting these... Having a starting
On 6 May 2012, at 08:20, Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
slightly better:
http://www.opensolaris.cz/builds/new.pkg.log.txt
Best regards,
Milan
Alasdair Lumsden píše v so 05. 05. 2012 v 01:00 +0100:
Hi Milan,
Could you try now?
I haven't sucked in the new prestable version yet
On 5 May 2012, at 16:31, Andrew Stormont wrote:
Not a fan of the license but the changes LGTM.
Copied verbatim from the source. They're a strange bunch.
Does this require gcc-4.4 to build?
It won't build with Studio out of the box. It could be patched, but I don't
think it's worth doing for
Hi All,
In s10-userland, early on we abstracted a lot of commonly used macros up into
the shared-macros area. Unfortunately illumos-userland doesn't have this and it
has created a situation where a lot of Makefiles unnecessarily duplicate macros.
For example, in s10-userland we added the
Hi All,
One improvement we added to s10-userland, was to download archives to a single
top level archives directory instead of into the component directory.
We used:
$(WS_TOP)/archives
We did this by defining USERLAND_ARCHIVES?= $(WS_TOP)/archives in
shared-macros.mk and fixing up prep.mk.
On 5 May 2012, at 17:41, Andrew Stormont wrote:
I think this is a great idea.
Great - thanks for the feedback! Glad I'm not the only one that thinks it would
be useful.
I'll get on with a changeset that people can test.
Cheers,
Alasdair
___
oi-dev
Hi Sriram,
On 5 May 2012, at 17:53, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Assuming a spec file based approach, wouldn't the SOURCES folder
already take care of this ?
illumos-userland is more like pkgsrc/FreeBSD ports tree in its
layout/structure. It doesn't follow spec file conventions.
Cheers,
Alasdair
Hi All,
Changeset for review:
https://www.illumos.org/issues/2679
https://bitbucket.org/alasdairlumsden/illumos-userland-2679/changeset/d87c903444d1
Cheers,
Alasdair
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
Hi All,
2680 Extract source archives to a subdirectory
2681 Downloading archives to a common area
I decided to do these two as a single changeset since they're intertwined.
https://bitbucket.org/alasdairlumsden/illumos-userland-2680/changeset/34c2dff6cc0d
Cheers,
Alasdair
Hi Milan, All,
I haven't had a chance yet to fix the long list of issues with it yet, sorry
for taking a while.
The /experimental repo is literally just a dump of illumos-userland over a
pkgrecv of 0.151.1.3 from /dev (Plus the sfw incorporation adjusted).
There are some conflicts that need
Hi Milan,
Could you try now?
I haven't sucked in the new prestable version yet but I've resolved the
conflicts, so it should install.
Cheers,
Alasdair
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Hi All,
I have updated the /experimental repo available at:
http://pkg.openindiana.org/experimental
This now contains oi_151a3 overlayed with what was previously available in
/experimental, plus gcc-44 - all at version string 1.1
Please give this a go and report back any issues. To use it,
Hi Milan,
It comes from illumos-gate. We have our own patches applied to the tree, but
nothing major:
https://hg.openindiana.org/sustaining/oi_151a/illumos-gate/
Our last sync with illumos-gate was 5 weeks ago.
Cheers,
Alasdair
On 21 Apr 2012, at 14:11, Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
could
Hi Jim,
Did you mean to send this to the illumos developer list rather than the OI one?
Cheers,
Alasdair
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On 20 Apr 2012, at 00:56, Jim Klimov wrote:
2012-04-20 3:40, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi Jim,
Did you mean to send this to the illumos developer list rather than the OI
one?
Hmmm... yes, I guess so.
This was my first attempt after all ;)
I'll repost then. What is your estimate, how much
Hi Milan,
On 15 Apr 2012, at 11:52, Milan Jurik wrote:
Removal Phase73/3158
Warning - directory /tmp/tmppQR55O/usr/share/man/cat1m not empty or not
expected during operation - contents preserved
in /tmp/tmppQR55O/var/pkg/lost
Hi Milan,
I've just checked, and it's because the new OI prestable ships with a newer
version of pkg which no longer delivers the cat1m file.
The newer pkg version I believe is the S11 pkg version backport to S11X to
facilitate upgrading between the two versions. It looks like
On 15 Apr 2012, at 13:54, Bayard Bell wrote:
A version of 3.6.4 is pending for the illumos-userland head.
Hi Walter,
Unfortunately however the new version probably won't make the stable branch.
The stuff in illumos-userland will be destined for /experimental followed by
/dev.
Cheers,
Hi Martin,
On 15 Apr 2012, at 15:10, Martin Walter wrote:
snip
Unfortunately however the new version probably won't make the stable branch.
The stuff in illumos-userland will be destined for /experimental followed by
/dev.
pkg.openindiana.org/experimental is last updated at 2011-11-19 !?
On 15 Apr 2012, at 18:59, Martin Walter wrote:
Would it be not easier and better to just make the newest version available?
E.g. I would much more prefer just a samba-3.6.4 package than an updated
samba-3.5.5.
Yes, if we were on the new build system. So updating samba for /experimental
Hi Martin,
We've obtained the Debian security patches for 3.5.6 which should hopefully
apply fairly cleanly against our 3.5.5:
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/samba
We're looking into things.
Cheers,
Alasdair
___
oi-dev
On 15 Apr 2012, at 21:50, Milan Jurik wrote:
The reality is that I am flooded with several new BEs per day. My grub
list is increasing frequently. OK, I have to live with it :-)
There's also:
pkg --no-backup-be
:-D
___
oi-dev mailing list
Hi Bayard,
Fine for me!
Cheers,
Alasdair
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Hi Bayard,
I think your comments regarding VBox being not-fit-for-purpose for Illumos/OI
development are completely valid and worth mentioning.
What are the plans regarding recruiting students onto GSoC? I'm not familiar
with how the whole process works. Is this something we need to advertise
On 2 Mar 2012, at 05:48, Richard PALO wrote:
bad news, the latest binary update from
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/v9.1.3/solaris/solaris11/
requires OpenSSL 1.0.0.
Boo! That sucks.
(probably because Oracle compiled it)
Hmm, I have my doubts, as Oracle yanked all traces of Postgresql
Hi Jean-Pierre,
Would you have any interest in adding this to the illumos-userland build
framework so that it ships with the distribution in future releases?
Regards,
Alasdair
On 28 Feb 2012, at 09:58, Jean-Pierre André wrote:
Hi,
I am now releasing the fuse kernel module for
On 24/02/2012 22:48, Bayard Bell wrote:
I've run the test suite for python 2.6.4 and 2.6.7 with gcc 4.4 and
studio. It turns out that considerably more modules have problems under
studio than gcc, none fail on gcc that don't also fail on studio, but
one module (sys) seems to fail slightly
On 11 Feb 2012, at 14:11, Gordon Ross wrote:
There's also the difference that pkg is real source code, (right?)
where most other things in userland are just build recipes.
If I correctly understood the suggestion for a separate tools gate,
then I think that sounds helpful.
Well! There are
Hi Jean-Pierre,
Great work! I wonder if we could find a way to get these fixes applied
upstream.
We would also like to add ntfs-3g to oi-build (illumos-userland)
Cheers,
Alasdair
On 24/01/2012 14:16, Jean-Pierre ANDRE wrote:
Hi,
As a maintainer of ntfs-3g, I have received bug reports on
Nice work JT!
This is very promising indeed :-)
On 16 Jan 2012, at 19:58, Jon Tibble wrote:
Hi all,
Today I turned on the repo and made the tarball of said repo available for
the first prestable release. Depending on how we go porting security fixes
to this or the rest of the community
Hi Jeppe,
On 12/19/11 10:40 PM, Jeppe Toustrup wrote:
Could somebody please look through this change set, and see if
everything looks okay?
https://bitbucket.org/Tenzer/oi-build/changeset/7ca13070e339
Great stuff - thanks for doing this!
A few comments:
1. Could you replace the OpenSolaris
Hi All,
We should have a quick weekly meeting before the Christmas festive
period kicks in - I've set the time at 19:00 so igork from Nexenta can
join us, it will be 11pm for him then.
There is no fixed agenda, but I imagine it will revolve around
illumos-userland, Illumian and getting
Hi All,
Due to the high cost of hosting OpenIndiana's dlc.openindiana.org on the
CDN, I have decided to instead discontinue this in favour of getting
worldwide mirrors online.
As of now, dlc.openindiana.org points at the origin server in the UK
instead of the CDN. I have enabled mod_bw in
Hi Jeff,
Great work! I'm going to install this shortly and give it a go.
Can you just confirm where you built illumos-gate and whether it was a
vanilla oi_151a install or if it had been updated to /experimental?
I have one of those new Intel cards in my PC so I'm looking forward to
giving
Hi Jeff,
On 12/ 4/11 09:20 PM, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
snip
I built it on the 151 sustaining zone @ EC.
Perfect - just the answer I was looking for :-)
I have one of those new Intel cards in my PC so I'm looking forward
to giving this a spin :-D
It works! Hurrah! *rips out the
Hi Bart,
On 11/27/11 02:07 PM, Bart Coddens wrote:
Hi List,
Can this be reviewed ?
https://bitbucket.org/bcoddens/oi-build/changeset/06a34066db9b
it published fine on my machine and works without problems.
Many thanks for providing this. GNU themselves on the Autoconf website
say Autoconf
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone had any comments on how we go about doing this -
there are a considerable number of changesets to import, and RTI-ing them all
would take forever.
I was thinking we could do the userland-gate resync as one big RTI; clone
oi-build on bitbucket, sync with
Hi Colin,
On 11/19/11 10:00 PM, Colin Ellis wrote:
https://bitbucket.org/cellis_oidev/oi-build/changeset/d7b944645d37
Great stuff! You're going to hate me though... I have more work for you!
:-D If you don't have time or would prefer me to do it just say and I'll
do it.
In the Makefile,
Forgot to mention, your .p5m files need the opensolaris package
classifications being filled in. If you're not sure what to use, just
shout and we can collectively think up an answer.
On 11/19/11 10:00 PM, Colin Ellis wrote:
https://bitbucket.org/cellis_oidev/oi-build/changeset/d7b944645d37
Hi Damian,
Yes, very much. oi-build is probably the best place to stick it.
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Contribution+Process
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Building+with+oi-build
Cheers,
Alasdair
On 3 Nov 2011, at 08:58, Damian Wojsław wrote:
Hi
I would like to work on inclusion of
Hi John,
s10-userland is exactly for that purpose.
We have a bootstrap tarball you can extract to / from here:
http://svn.everycity.co.uk/public/solaris/misc/pkg5-s10-bootstrap-20110518.tar.gz
This will install the IPS package manager to /ec/bin/pkg which you can then use
to install packages
Hi Bayard,
Many thanks for picking that up - it's much appreciated!
Also a big big thanks to Andrzej Szeszo for the initial high quality work here;
it has been a large investment in his time and it'll be great to get these
packages integrated.
Cheers,
Alasdair
On 17 Oct 2011, at 21:38,
On 15 Oct 2011, at 18:33, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
Any issues with merging this?
http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-xmessage/rev/2a8d1caea18f
LGTM!
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Hi Jeff,
On 10 Oct 2011, at 02:58, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
First of all...very cool!
I hope to add the new repo to some of my systems to start benefiting from
the additional/updated software.
Remember to be careful - here be dragons etc ;-)
Now, the questions/issues... :)
The catalog
Hi All,
Behold: http://ci-master.uk.openindiana.org/
I have a bulk build of everything in progress, and after each successful
package install, it will publish to http://pkg.openindiana.org/experimental/
This is exactly what we have been after for some time now :-)
It should hopefully be very
Hi Jeff,
Looks good :-)
My only comment is you might want to drop:
file path=usr/lib/irssi/modules/libirc_proxy.a
But other than that it looks really good! :-D
Cheers,
Alasdair
On 8 Oct 2011, at 00:07, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
Here's attempt #2:
On 20 Sep 2011, at 17:46, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 19/09/2011 18:36, Peter Tribble wrote:
My notes say that gmake-3.82 broke my build of gstreamer. I found that
out pretty quickly and rolled back, so didn't
Hi Bayard,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 18:11, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 20:29 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
Any issues with merging this?
http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-gnupg/rev/6e09047a6043
(https://www.illumos.org/issues/1220)
If the bug report is agreed, I reckon
On 3 Oct 2011, at 21:14, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:56:26PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
Hi,
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek jef...@josefsipek.net [2011-10-02 02:29]:
Any issues with merging this?
http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-gnupg/rev/6e09047a6043
Hi Alex,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 22:08, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
snip
Is there some special reason why you are working on this package, given
that oi-sfe already delivers it and the Before adding new packages to
oi-build remark in
On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:31, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
bdb.
Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bdb-5.2)?
Hi Jeff, Bayard,
Bayard - nice review points!
On 3 Oct 2011, at 18:06, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
snip
2) is there any basis for thinking that bdb should only be built for
32-bit support, or would we reasonably expect that 64-bit binaries would
need to link against it?
For a library like bdb, we
Hi Guido,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:55, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
snip
Also the documentation should be delivered into
/usr/share/doc/package and not /usr/docs.
Good catch!
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
Hi Bayard,
On 4 Oct 2011, at 02:09, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
snip
If OI decides now is the time to start delivering, let's at least check
for other areas of overlap and make sure that we're standing solidly on
your shoulders. In particular, how about other questions raised, such as
delivering
On 4 Oct 2011, at 12:24, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek jef...@josefsipek.net [2011-10-02 02:59]:
Any issues with merging this?
http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
(https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
Thanks,
The Userland-gate mirror is back online,
Hi All,
http://alasdairrr.tumblr.com/post/10404734792/libreoffice
We've been joined by a LibreOffice developer in #oi-dev, who is willing
to help us with a port of LibreOffice to OpenIndiana.
Unfortunately all the usual suspects who might work on this are tied up
- so I'm mailing the lists
Awesome! Be great to have LibreOffice on OI, if only to snub Oracle :-P
Quite :-)
Last I poked around, the jury was still out on LibreOffice vs. Apache's
incarnation of OpenOffice as preferred office suite on OI. But I've
been being a fun hog and away from the 'puter for much of the summer
Hi Jeff,
On 19/09/2011 15:45, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
The current version of gmake is 3.81. That was released in 2006. There has
been bugfixes since, and version 3.82 was released in April 2010. This
change bumps the gmake version to 3.82. As far as testing is concerned, I
used it to
Hi Peter,
On 19/09/2011 16:52, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Alasdair Lumsdenalasdai...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Looks good to me! I'm not aware of any problems that might result from
upgrading to gmake 3.82 - does anyone on-list know of any?
I've had several build
Hi There,
On 09/10/11 04:34 PM, carlopmart wrote:
On 09/08/2011 09:41 AM, carlopmart wrote:
snip
Can somebody confirms that maybe exists a bug using exclude as ip-type
option under OpenIndiana oi_151's zones/crossbow??
Exclusive IP zones work fine. As far as I know there are no major bugs
On 09/10/11 05:36 PM, carlopmart wrote:
Thanks Alasdair, but using what build 148 or 151??
We've got boxes running 147, 148 and 151...
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
Hi Gary,
On 09/ 9/11 05:08 PM, Gary wrote:
some mod_rewrite redirects could fix the problem temporarily for the
mailing list link but with pkgdev.openindiana.org
http://pkgdev.openindiana.org you'd have to have DNS point somewhere
else for a redirect to work.
Yes that's probably a good idea -
Hi TJ,
On 10 Sep 2011, at 01:25, TJ Yang wrote:
Also, should we offer vm images by vmware and virtualbox for people to
download ?
I can volunteer myself for vmware image preparation.
That would be exceptionally useful - yes! Once the release is out please get in
touch :-)
Also thanks for
Hi TJ,
Was your grub issue with the Text Installer or the Live ISO?
It looks like the splashimage bits are missing so your bootfs line runs
on to the kernel line. I can't reproduce it with the Live ISO (gui
installer) so am wondering if you installed from the Text installer.
Cheers,
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
