On 12/11/19 08:37 PM, Matt A. Tobin wrote:
BUT, that isn't what has happened this day. No, this day did not turn
out as hoped for by the young programmer. Something very different
happened. He, and by extension, all of us who work on the Unified XUL
Platform and the projects, Pale Moon
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Matt A. Tobin wrote:
So here we are, I am writing to all of you because someone I have come to
know and who worked very hard to bring his chosen software to his chosen OS
for all to use and enjoy has been crushed. What does this say about the Open
Source community and
The Pale Moon redistribution license is very clear
http://www.palemoon.org/redist.shtml . However, Jeremy Andrews
approached us to facilitate (re)introduction of Modern Solaris (and
flavors there of) support back into the Unified XUL Platform.
I understand how poor choice of words in the
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
Till Wegmüller writes:
I concur. Some politeness goes a long way. This problem with the license
requirements however stems from firefox originally. Only that in
firefox'es case they fought with the debian community and lost. It seems
like the
On 12/11/19 12:51 PM, Jeremy Andrews wrote:
This is an interesting discussion, and I did want to address some
additional comments...
Actually, the restrictions they have are on the use of the official
branding. They are saying you have to build it a specific way if you
want to use their
This is an interesting discussion, and I did want to address some
additional comments...
Actually, the restrictions they have are on the use of the official
branding. They are saying you have to build it a specific way if you
want to use their official branding, and they have very specific
Till Wegmüller writes:
> I concur. Some politeness goes a long way. This problem with the license
> requirements however stems from firefox originally. Only that in
> firefox'es case they fought with the debian community and lost. It seems
> like the Palemoon community needs to have the same
I concur. Some politeness goes a long way. This problem with the license
requirements however stems from firefox originally. Only that in
firefox'es case they fought with the debian community and lost. It seems
like the Palemoon community needs to have the same experience. Sadly
Anyhow.
Hi.
I was a bit of uncomfortable to point to this issue, but as others already
mention this, let this be settled. We will not distribute Pale Moon via OI
infrastructure. If someone has free cycles, I'd advice him to look at FF
component, which needs some love.
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Thanks Michal for pointing that out. I wasn’t aware of that. Additional reason
to avoid it then :)
> On 11 Dec 2019, at 09:22, Michal Nowak via oi-dev
> wrote:
>
> On 12/11/19 07:38 AM, Jeremy Andrews wrote:
>> I ported UXP to illumos and Solaris recently, and I got them to take the
>> code
Thanks for your answers, Gary. One point of clarification below:
On 11/27/19 03:58 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
* we don't test that changes build the less work on SPARC
I don't understand this condition.
"It's not required to test update (PR) on SPARC for it to be merged."
Is this wording
On 12/11/19 07:38 AM, Jeremy Andrews wrote:
I ported UXP to illumos and Solaris recently, and I got them to take the
code upstream. I'm pretty anxious about the process now honestly, and
really want everything to work out. There are a few things I'm worried
about, though.
1. I'm not very
12 matches
Mail list logo
