On 02/07/20 06:46 AM, Marcel Telka wrote:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 01:28:12PM +0100, Michal Nowak via oi-dev wrote:
On 02/02/20 08:15 AM, Marcel Telka wrote:
I noticed that rsync at dlc-origin stopped to work about 4 days ago:
rsync: failed to connect to dlc-origin.openindiana.org
On 02/02/20 08:15 AM, Marcel Telka wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that rsync at dlc-origin stopped to work about 4 days ago:
rsync: failed to connect to dlc-origin.openindiana.org (91.194.75.37):
Connection timed out (145)
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(127)
We came across this problem before and therefor added
COMPONENT_BUILD_ENV += GOCACHE="$(SOURCE_DIR)/gocache"
to golang-11{2,3} packages.
Any idea why this still failed?
Michal
On 01/27/20 09:37 AM, Till Wegmüller wrote:
Hi Aurelien
Yes you must define GOCACHE. Go modules requires this
On 01/12/20 04:03 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
I'm attempting to build openjdk-8-162 with gcc-6 on SPARC hardware. I
finally got a successful gmake build, but a failure with gmake
install. The error was this one:
Error occurred during initialization of VM
java.lang.StackOverflowError
On 12/12/19 03:13 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:34:03AM +0100, Michal Nowak via oi-dev wrote:
Thanks for your answers, Gary. One point of clarification below:
On 11/27/19 03:58 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
* we don't test that changes build the less work on SPARC
I don't
On 12/11/19 08:37 PM, Matt A. Tobin wrote:
BUT, that isn't what has happened this day. No, this day did not turn
out as hoped for by the young programmer. Something very different
happened. He, and by extension, all of us who work on the Unified XUL
Platform and the projects, Pale Moon
On 12/11/19 12:51 PM, Jeremy Andrews wrote:
This is an interesting discussion, and I did want to address some
additional comments...
Actually, the restrictions they have are on the use of the official
branding. They are saying you have to build it a specific way if you
want to use their
Thanks for your answers, Gary. One point of clarification below:
On 11/27/19 03:58 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
* we don't test that changes build the less work on SPARC
I don't understand this condition.
"It's not required to test update (PR) on SPARC for it to be merged."
Is this wording
On 12/11/19 07:38 AM, Jeremy Andrews wrote:
I ported UXP to illumos and Solaris recently, and I got them to take the
code upstream. I'm pretty anxious about the process now honestly, and
really want everything to work out. There are a few things I'm worried
about, though.
1. I'm not very
