After upgrading disk performance dropped from avg. 60MB/s to 17MB/s when
copying over the network to a windows vm.Booting back to pre-upgrade and
performance is restored
Would this be resolved if the pool is upgraded?
performance r151012
From: t...@oetiker.ch
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 07:02:05 +0200
CC: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com
To: gearbo...@outlook.com
On 03.10.2014, at 06:51, Machine Man gearbo...@outlook.com wrote:
After upgrading disk performance dropped from avg. 60MB/s to 17MB/s when
copying over
Hello,We experience slow network performance after upgrading for virtual
machines.
Copying from a system (physical machine) to the VM the copy speed drop from
85MB/s on release 10 to between 9 and 14MB/s. Both systems I upgraded
experience the exact same symptom and use the igb driver.Both have
Correct. The copy would also stall quickly and pool utilization would be at 10%.
I have not tested NFS for example, but I am sure that would have been discussed
if that was happening. I did have to do zfs send/recv between two nodes on the
same subnet and did not notice any performance issue
Experience slow network performance after upgrading.
Copying from another windows system (physical machine) it drops form the 85MB/s
on R10 to between 9 and 14MB/s. Two systems experience the exact same symptom.
Both make use of igb driver.
Copy tests are done between windows 8.1 and Windows
Hi,
Are there any pointers for
create the underlying ZFS volume for the windows disk.
Currently I am using block
volume created at 4k.
The servers have LSI 2308
controllers in IT mode and I am seeing high disk queue lengths with the system
not doing really anything. The system was just
I am on r14 LTS on all of my systems.
Installing pfSense I see the following in the system log; 1000's of them on all
interfaces:
em0: a looped back NS message is detected during DAD for
fe80:1::8:20ee:fed2:125. Another DAD probes are being sent.
The only posts I could find date back to 2013
I'm looking to deploy an all NVMe system, 2x 400GB for rpool and 4x 800GB for
the data pool.
I have had poor performance for virtual machines using either 10k or 15k drives
and also adding mirrored ZIL and L2 cache SSD. All SAS of course. This got
expensive fast and only striped mirror vdevs
I am looking to build an all NVMe system using:
SYS-1028U-TN10RT+
OS will be on a mirror pair of 400GB and there will be a data pool of 4x 800GB
in striped mirror pair. (there will be one 2x small VMs on rpool)
The system will run 7 virtual machines (most will be Windows 2012R2 and one a
Can the smartmontools be used on OmniOS to collect JBOD enclosure status, FANs
voltages etc. ?
Thanks
___
OmniOS-discuss mailing list
OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com
http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
McDonald <dan...@omniti.com>
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 9:34:11 AM
To: Machine Man
Cc: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com; Dan McDonald
Subject: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] stmfproxy ALUA RSF-1
> On Mar 5, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Machine Man <gearbo...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> I see the fo
ell...@richardelling.com>
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:15:32 PM
To: Machine Man
Cc: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com
Subject: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ZeusRAM - predictive failure
On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:00 PM, Machine Man
<gearbo...@outlook.com<mailto:gearbo...@outlook.com>> wrote:
To
I am in the process of deploying RSF-1 and running into trouble with ALUA.
Access is slow or most of the time it does not work.
Disabling ALUA access instantly works, but requires a rescan on the VMware
nodes when failing over.
I see the following on both nodes:
[ID 602194 daemon.warning]
Currently I have a few of deployments of OmniOS at remote sites hosing 2 - 7
VMs per site and replicate snapshots of the VMs to a central server at a
hosting location.
My customers are starting to get pressure that the local and backup data is not
encrypted at rest and its becoming critical for
mniti.com>;
Machine Man<mailto:gearbo...@outlook.com>;
omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com<mailto:omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com>
Subject: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Encryption options
On August 3, 2017 5:50:32 PM GMT+02:00, Machine Man <gearbo...@outlook.com>
wrote:
>Curr
When I add a USB disk from an image it always shows up as the 1st disk so the
boot order using "c" will always select USB.
How do I boot from the 1st hard drive without disconnecting USB?
-device piix3-usb-uhci,id=uhci \
-drive file=$HDD1,if=virtio,index=0 \
-drive file=$HDD2,if=virtio,index=1
I removed the data disks and installed on 2x 512 disks then added the 4k disks
again boot fails.
I'm not sure that this can be the expected behavior with 4k disks almost being
the norm these days.
Getting error panic bd_strategy 512 bytes I/O not multiple of block size.
I downloaded the latest
Ok doing a search I see this a known issue. I will install release 14 instead.
From: Machine Man<mailto:gearbo...@outlook.com>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 18:33
To: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com<mailto:omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com>
Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] Release 22 un
Is this still online? I am not able to update my last two machines by change
over to OpenSSH before upgrading to OmniOS CE r22.
Are there any other hosted repos I can point to just to get the change over to
openssh completed?
Is there a workaround?
I just updated a machines this past Sunday
The system does have internet access and proper DNS resolution.
I can do wget of http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/r151014/omnios
From: Dan McDonald <dan...@kebe.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 3:31:47 PM
To: Machine Man
Cc: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.co
Hmmm I just tried it again and its working
Not waiting around again.
Thanks
From: Machine Man <gearbo...@outlook.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 10:30:39 AM
To: Dan McDonald
Cc: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com; Dan McDonald
Subject: RE: [OmniOS-discuss] R
21 matches
Mail list logo
