Re: [OMPI packagers] Does anyone care about 32-bit Open MPI?
Just for info : Cygwin dropped 32bit support I doubt we had any OpenMPI 32bit user. On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:13 PM Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via ompi-packagers wrote: > > I'm bringing this topic back (from nearly two years ago): does anyone care > about 32 bit support for Open MPI >= v5.0.0? > > I ask because we disabled 32 bit builds on main and v5.0.x about 2 weeks ago > (by making configure fail when it is building in a 32-bit environment). > A few days ago, we some pushback from the Debian community: > https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/11282#issuecomment-1416364660. > > Alistair / Debian: did this March 2021 message here on the packagers list fly > under your radar? Does Debian actually care about 32 bit support for Open > MPI? > > From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) > Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:40 AM > To: Open MPI Packagers > Subject: Does anyone care about 32-bit Open MPI? > > Open MPI packagers -- > > We're seriously contemplating dropping 32 bit support for Open MPI v5.0 > (32-bit support will continue in Open MPI series prior to v5.0.x -- for > example, the v4.1.x series will continue to have 32-bit support). > > Will this be a problem for the downstream Open MPI packagers? > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > > ___ > ompi-packagers mailing list > ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers ___ ompi-packagers mailing list ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers
Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI v5.0 packaging change: require pandoc
Am 14.04.2020 um 21:35 schrieb Marco Atzeri: Am 14.04.2020 um 20:22 schrieb Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via ompi-packagers: On Apr 14, 2020, at 12:23 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: Open MPI packagers -- We would like to require "pandoc" for building Open MPI >=v5.0.x from a git clone, at least version v1.12. Is this ok with all of you? give me time to try build it. Currently is not available on cygwin Ok. It may be a little annoying, because it is written in Haskell, so you have to also have the GNU Haskell compiler. that also is missing on cygwin. Let me see if I can come with something usable, but is seems on the complex side. Regards Marco very complex https://www.joachim-breitner.de/blog/748-Thoughts_on_bootstrapping_GHC It is one of the cases where a new system will be almost impossible to bootstrap. I saw something similar in GO build system so for me Pandoc seems a no go. Regards Marco ___ ompi-packagers mailing list ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers
Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI v5.0 packaging change: require pandoc
Am 14.04.2020 um 20:22 schrieb Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via ompi-packagers: On Apr 14, 2020, at 12:23 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: Open MPI packagers -- We would like to require "pandoc" for building Open MPI >=v5.0.x from a git clone, at least version v1.12. Is this ok with all of you? give me time to try build it. Currently is not available on cygwin Ok. It may be a little annoying, because it is written in Haskell, so you have to also have the GNU Haskell compiler. that also is missing on cygwin. Let me see if I can come with something usable, but is seems on the complex side. Regards Marco ___ ompi-packagers mailing list ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers
Re: [OMPI packagers] Open MPI v5.0 packaging change: require pandoc
Am 14.04.2020 um 18:02 schrieb Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via ompi-packagers: Open MPI packagers -- We would like to require "pandoc" for building Open MPI >=v5.0.x from a git clone, at least version v1.12. Is this ok with all of you? give me time to try build it. Currently is not available on cygwin Regards Marco ___ ompi-packagers mailing list ompi-packagers@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/ompi-packagers
