Re: [onap-discuss] Call for vCPE VNFs proposals

[Zhou, Danny]

The wiki 
page
 already lists preferred and usable open source VNFs like below, but the ONOS 
vBNG as open source vBNG and OpenWRT as open source vHGW does not make sense to 
me. Specifically, the ONOS vBNG is essentially a L3 NAT without the 
capabilities to address requirement such as session management, traffic 
aggregation and routing, etc., and in addition to OpenWRT acting as vHGW, VPP 
based high performance Home 
Gateway as well as 
vRouter should be better.

  *   vDHCP: ISC DHCP
  *   vDNS:   ISC Bind
  *   vAAA:   FreeRADIUS

-Danny Zhou
Intel

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 3:36 AM
To: KLUGER, YOAV ; onap-...@lists.onap.org; 
onap-discuss 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Call for vCPE VNFs proposals

I recommend that any available open source implementations of these VNFs also 
be included. I am aware of several potential VNFs as used in the R-CORD 
project, and as being collected through the similar ODL VCO (Virtualized 
Central Office) project. These are being collected and assessed for deployment 
on OPNFV reference platforms as part of the proposed "Edge" project: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Multi-Access+Edge intended to expand 
reference VNF options for edge-focused service deployments such as residential 
broadband. As a part of this project we will also be building reference 
blueprints (TOSCA based) for these VNFs and orchestrating them using ONAP 
components as well as other projects we are currently using for this in OPNFV 
(Cloudify, and OpenStack Tacker).

OPNFV is acquiring the necessary hardware (e.g. OLT devices) to have a 
fully-functional edge-focused lab environment in which to complete this 
integration. I'll add the related info to the ONAP wiki as the usability of the 
open source VNFs becomes clear.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of KLUGER, YOAV
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:23 PM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss 
>
Subject: [onap-discuss] Call for vCPE VNFs proposals

Dear ONAP community,

As we all know, the Residential Broadband vCPE use case is one of our two 
targeted use cases for R1.
Its wiki 
page
 has been significantly enriched recently, and more details are added on a 
daily basis.
A general residential broadband solution can be much more complex than what 
would be reasonably achievable by R1. We have narrowed down the description of 
the use case for R1, to something that should be both achievable and usable.
For the use case to work the following VNFs will be needed:

  *   vBNG
  *   vHGW
  *   vDHCP
  *   vDNS
  *   vAAA


In addition a simple hardware box with 802.1ad capabilities will be needed.

This is a call for vendors of such VNFs and/or such a box to join the activity. 
Would be great if by Beijing time the wiki will have at least one vendor name 
alongside every VNF, and also at least one vendor for the box.

Thanks,
Yoav Kluger
Amdocs Technology
+1(201)912-7294
+972-54-4850278
[amdocs-a]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] subscriber missed after docker image updated.

[Chenchuanyu]

Hi all,
   I update the images of ONAP(aai, sdc, portal vid etc) . And restart the 
service using /opt/xx_vm_init.sh.
   After that, the subscriber missed. Does anyone know why it happened?
   Is there any way to add a subscriber?

Thanks,
   Chuanyu Chen.

[cid:image001.png@01D2DAC1.3C924D50]

***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！
**

***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not   
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is  prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately 
and delete it!
***

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] demo.sh failing with ssl error

[Vikram Mukundamgari]

Hello,  sorry for the delay response,
I no more have the OpenStack environment where I had SSl issue.
Currently using a new Fuel Deployed Mitaka Openstack without SSL/TLS.
./demo.sh init script ran successfully today in new environment.

Thanks,
Vikram



From: "Lefevre, Catherine" 
Date: Monday, May 29, 2017 at 7:29 AM
To: Vikram Mukundamgari , "ROSE, DANIEL V" 
, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: RE: demo.sh failing with ssl error

Good morning Vikram,

There have been several threads regarding the demo.sh failing.
I would like to check with you if your problem has been solved or if you are 
still facing an issue?

Many thanks & regards
Catherine

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Vikram Mukundamgari
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 6:34 PM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] demo.sh failing with ssl error

Hi,

Even after changing the verify =False , I am still getting the same error .

Attached is the log.html file.

Thanks,
Vikram



From: "ROSE, DANIEL V" >
Date: Monday, April 24, 2017 at 2:25 PM
To: Vikram Mukundamgari 
>, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
>
Subject: RE: demo.sh failing with ssl error

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=testsuite.git;a=blob;f=robot/resources/openstack/keystone_interface.robot;h=6c48e12086ef0bd04aaa05f486b7aae4ae9aff7a;hb=refs/heads/release-1.0.0#l23

I believe verify has to be set to False and then you can rerun the test again 
and it will get past it.


Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Vikram Mukundamgari
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 5:07 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] demo.sh failing with ssl error

Hi ,

Running ./demo.sh init in robot vm is failing with ssl error shown below


SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed 
(_ssl.c:590)

Traceback (most recent call last): File 
"/var/opt/OpenECOMP_ETE/robot/library/RequestsLibrary/RequestsKeywords.py", 
line 421, in post_request timeout) File 
"/var/opt/OpenECOMP_ETE/robot/library/RequestsLibrary/RequestsKeywords.py", 
line 871, in _body_request cookies=self.cookies) File 
"/var/opt/OpenECOMP_ETE/robot/library/requests/sessions.py", line 535, in post 
return self.request('POST', url, data=data, json=json, **kwargs) File 
"/var/opt/OpenECOMP_ETE/robot/library/requests/sessions.py", line 488, in 
request resp = self.send(prep, **send_kwargs) File 
"/var/opt/OpenECOMP_ETE/robot/library/requests/sessions.py", line 609, in send 
r = adapter.send(request, **kwargs) File 
"/var/opt/OpenECOMP_ETE/robot/library/requests/adapters.py", line 497, in send 
raise SSLError(e, request=request)

Is there any workaround to bypass the verification or pass the path to 
certificate.

Also attached the log.html

Thanks,
Vikram
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [ONAP RELEASE MANAGER ELECTION] Call For Nominations

[Phil Robb]

Hello ONAP Community Members:

Please consider this email as the kickoff of the ONAP Release Manager
Election process.  A description of the role can be found on the ONAP
Release Manager Election (2017) page here:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6589452

Any member of the technical community is eligible to run for this
position.  It is not exclusively reserved for TSC Members.  However, only
TSC members are eligible to vote when choosing among the potential
candidates.  This position serves at the pleasure of the TSC.

There are two phases to the election process.  The first is the Nomination
Phase where community members may nominate themselves for the position of
"ONAP Release Manager".  Once the Nomination Phase has concluded, we will
enter the Election Phase, where all ONAP TSC Members are invited and
encouraged to vote on the candidates whom have been nominated.

Timing:
• Nominations open May 31st, 2017.
• Nominations close June 7th at 9:00pm Pacific Time
• Voting begins June 8th, 2017
• Voting Ends June 15th, 2017 at 9:00pm Pacific Time

If you wish to nominate yourself for the position of "ONAP Release
Manager", please respond-all to this email indicating your interest to
stand for election.

All nominees are invited to provide their Picture, Biography, and Statement
of Intent on the election wiki page so that members of the TSC, and the
community, can learn more about the candidate and their intentions for the
role of Release Manager. The nominee ordering on the election wiki page
will be in ascending alphabetical order by last name.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Best,

Phil.
-- 
Phil Robb
Executive Director, OpenDaylight Project
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

[ROSE, DANIEL V]

Yeah sorry I think its ICE. I get confused still at ll those related projects ☺

Steve Wright has mentioned they had some validation tools one could use the 
ONAP was going to get.

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: WEINSTOCK, ALAN M
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 4:59 PM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V ; Konstantin Dunaev ; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

Konstantin, Daniel

Maybe more the domain of the VNF Validation Program (ONAP ICE)  project?  The 
VNF Validation Program (ONAP ICE) project is now ready for review: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ICE

Konstantin –

2 YAML validation tools you can try are below.  We have used the first one to 
find “hidden” tab characters.

http://yaml-online-parser.appspot.com/
http://www.yamllint.com/

How were these “error messages” generated?  Were they part of the SDC 
on-boarding process?  MSO?   vf_module_name is optional in MSO.
---
Validate file aliagnment - heat validator cannot parse templates.
ECOMP parameters missing -  vf_module_name, vnf_name, and vnf_id

Parameter missing vm_type - any parameter associated with a VM must have a 
vm_type assigned.


---
Would you be willing to share your Heat template?

Regards,
Alan


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of ROSE, DANIEL V
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:44 AM
To: Konstantin Dunaev >; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Konstantin,

Such a thing would probably be the domain of 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VNF+SDK
 project but it doesn’t exist today.

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Dunaev
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:29 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

Hello ONAP Community,

we are using “VNF Heat Template Requirements for OpenEcomp” to prepare a Heat 
template, but we don't have running ONAP environment and I can't validate my 
files. We're in the process to install it, but it requires time and resources 
and make take longe time.
Is there any "offline" validation tool, which we can use to verify/validate 
Heat templates before we send them to ONAP environment (running at the customer 
site).
When we sent our current Heat files, the customer responded back with the 
information:

---
Validate file aliagnment - heat validator cannot parse templates.
ECOMP parameters missing -  vf_module_name, vnf_name, and vnf_id

Parameter missing vm_type - any parameter associated with a VM must have a 
vm_type assigned.


---
I could find and correct some problems with naming, but not sure if I see them 
all.
Best regards,
Konstantin
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

[WEINSTOCK, ALAN M]

Konstantin, Daniel

Maybe more the domain of the VNF Validation Program (ONAP ICE)  project?  The 
VNF Validation Program (ONAP ICE) project is now ready for review: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ICE

Konstantin –

2 YAML validation tools you can try are below.  We have used the first one to 
find “hidden” tab characters.

http://yaml-online-parser.appspot.com/
http://www.yamllint.com/

How were these “error messages” generated?  Were they part of the SDC 
on-boarding process?  MSO?   vf_module_name is optional in MSO.
---
Validate file aliagnment - heat validator cannot parse templates.
ECOMP parameters missing -  vf_module_name, vnf_name, and vnf_id

Parameter missing vm_type - any parameter associated with a VM must have a 
vm_type assigned.


---
Would you be willing to share your Heat template?

Regards,
Alan


From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of ROSE, DANIEL V
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:44 AM
To: Konstantin Dunaev ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Konstantin,

Such a thing would probably be the domain of 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VNF+SDK
 project but it doesn’t exist today.

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Dunaev
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:29 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

Hello ONAP Community,

we are using “VNF Heat Template Requirements for OpenEcomp” to prepare a Heat 
template, but we don't have running ONAP environment and I can't validate my 
files. We're in the process to install it, but it requires time and resources 
and make take longe time.
Is there any "offline" validation tool, which we can use to verify/validate 
Heat templates before we send them to ONAP environment (running at the customer 
site).
When we sent our current Heat files, the customer responded back with the 
information:

---
Validate file aliagnment - heat validator cannot parse templates.
ECOMP parameters missing -  vf_module_name, vnf_name, and vnf_id

Parameter missing vm_type - any parameter associated with a VM must have a 
vm_type assigned.


---
I could find and correct some problems with naming, but not sure if I see them 
all.
Best regards,
Konstantin
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Call for vCPE VNFs proposals

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L]

I recommend that any available open source implementations of these VNFs also 
be included. I am aware of several potential VNFs as used in the R-CORD 
project, and as being collected through the similar ODL VCO (Virtualized 
Central Office) project. These are being collected and assessed for deployment 
on OPNFV reference platforms as part of the proposed "Edge" project: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Multi-Access+Edge intended to expand 
reference VNF options for edge-focused service deployments such as residential 
broadband. As a part of this project we will also be building reference 
blueprints (TOSCA based) for these VNFs and orchestrating them using ONAP 
components as well as other projects we are currently using for this in OPNFV 
(Cloudify, and OpenStack Tacker).

OPNFV is acquiring the necessary hardware (e.g. OLT devices) to have a 
fully-functional edge-focused lab environment in which to complete this 
integration. I'll add the related info to the ONAP wiki as the usability of the 
open source VNFs becomes clear.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of KLUGER, YOAV
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:23 PM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss 
Subject: [onap-discuss] Call for vCPE VNFs proposals

Dear ONAP community,

As we all know, the Residential Broadband vCPE use case is one of our two 
targeted use cases for R1.
Its wiki 
page
 has been significantly enriched recently, and more details are added on a 
daily basis.
A general residential broadband solution can be much more complex than what 
would be reasonably achievable by R1. We have narrowed down the description of 
the use case for R1, to something that should be both achievable and usable.
For the use case to work the following VNFs will be needed:

  *   vBNG
  *   vHGW
  *   vDHCP
  *   vDNS
  *   vAAA


In addition a simple hardware box with 802.1ad capabilities will be needed.

This is a call for vendors of such VNFs and/or such a box to join the activity. 
Would be great if by Beijing time the wiki will have at least one vendor name 
alongside every VNF, and also at least one vendor for the box.

Thanks,
Yoav Kluger
Amdocs Technology
+1(201)912-7294
+972-54-4850278
[amdocs-a]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] Call for vCPE VNFs proposals

[Yoav Kluger]

Dear ONAP community,

As we all know, the Residential Broadband vCPE use case is one of our two 
targeted use cases for R1.
Its wiki 
page 
has been significantly enriched recently, and more details are added on a daily 
basis.
A general residential broadband solution can be much more complex than what 
would be reasonably achievable by R1. We have narrowed down the description of 
the use case for R1, to something that should be both achievable and usable.
For the use case to work the following VNFs will be needed:

* vBNG

* vHGW

* vDHCP

* vDNS

* vAAA


In addition a simple hardware box with 802.1ad capabilities will be needed.

This is a call for vendors of such VNFs and/or such a box to join the activity. 
Would be great if by Beijing time the wiki will have at least one vendor name 
alongside every VNF, and also at least one vendor for the box.

Thanks,
Yoav Kluger
Amdocs Technology
+1(201)912-7294
+972-54-4850278
[amdocs-a]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

[Ali, Shaheen]

Thanks very much.  I am downloading it now.  I could not find this tag when i 
was inspecting nexus3.

From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D [bf1...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 2:52 PM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V; Ali, Shaheen; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron

(after docker login)

docker pull nexus3.onap.org:10001/openecomp/sdnc-image:1.1.1-SNAPSHOT

pulls Boron-SR1 for me.

Brian


From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of ROSE, DANIEL V
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Ali, Shaheen ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Can you try with 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT?

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: Ali, Shaheen [mailto:shaheen@centurylink.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:50 PM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V >; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron

I got the same ODL version when I did the same command for sdnc-image.

From: ROSE, DANIEL V [dr6...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:54 AM
To: Ali, Shaheen; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron
Appc  may need to build or something? Someone from appc team will have to 
comment but theres no reason it should be running anything but boron

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: Ali, Shaheen [mailto:shaheen@centurylink.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:54 AM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V >; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron

What docker command should I use to make sure I pull the latest 1.1?

docker pull nexus3.onap.org:10001/appc-image:latest is running Beryllium.

Shaheen

From: ROSE, DANIEL V [dr6...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:49 AM
To: Ali, Shaheen; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron
The latest 1.1 image should have it

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Ali, Shaheen
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:47 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

Hello ONAP,

I pulled sdnc-image:latest from the docker repo nexus3.onap.org:10001, and 
found that was running ODL Beryllium.

That surprised me?  How can I pull docker images running running ODL Boron?

Thanks,

Shaheen

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Staging repo in settings.xml

[Gary Wu]

Hi Oliver,

There are definitely disadvantages to keeping all versions in sync, as you 
mentioned.

I think the main issue to decide on is this: To what degree will the ONAP 
community support a mix of different versions of different modules?  
If each module is independently versioned, then which specific version 
combinations will ONAP officially support for each ONAP release?  

* If we only support one canonical combination, then we might as well keep all 
versions in sync.
* If we support arbitrary version combinations, then the number of possible 
combinations becomes astronomical.
* Or maybe it's somewhere between the two, i.e. keep a small list of specific, 
supported version combinations, maybe corresponding to a few critical fixes 
only.

Any bug fix or version bump in any module has the potential to introduce a 
breaking change against some specific versions of another module, or even 
breaking compatibility with a VNF that had been certified against a particular 
"base release" of ONAP.  How should we address such issues?  How should we 
respond to people who are using a version combination that is not officially 
supported?

I can see pros and cons to either approach (sync all versions or not), which is 
why the TSC probably needs to weigh in on this.

Thanks,
Gary


-Original Message-
From: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) [mailto:spat...@research.att.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 6:22 AM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: CLOSSET, CHRISTOPHE ; Andrew Grimberg 
; Coquelin, Sebastien 
; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Staging repo in settings.xml


Gary,

thanks for the summary. 

I would NOT try to keep the version numbers in sync. Either way creates work 
and I believe keeping them in sync creates much more work.

E.g. if you apply a patch to a jar file (let’s say an emergency security patch 
which will come..) in a release branch does that mean everybody has to generate 
a jar file with the matching version number and push it out even if nothing 
changed? So that creates work for 31 projects (current count) when one project 
fixes a bug in one jar file. Does even the documentation projects have to bump 
the version number on there documentation because somebody edited a jar file? 
That either slows down patching or generates a lot of work for a lot of people.

Even keeping mayor version numbers in sync is questionable to me. E.g. if two 
years from now a new project is started and ONAP is on release 4.x.x does that 
mean a fairly new jar file should start out with release number 4.x.x ? That 
would indicate much more maturity then the jar file probably has at that point 
in time and is misleading to the user. 

So I would have an ONAP release number and version numbers of artifacts which 
tie into a release. I am not quite sure why that would be more work then above.

Oliver

> On May 30, 2017, at 6:49 PM  EDT, Gary Wu  wrote:
> 
> A quick summary of our call this morning with myself, Christophe, and 
> Sebastien:
>  
> The consensus is that we’re ok to move the Java artifacts back to SNAPSHOT 
> versioning (and thereby removing build dependencies on Staging repos) as long 
> as the docker images can continue with the current STAGING tags.  Christophe 
> will check back with AT teams to organize this effort, hopefully to be done 
> within a few days.
>  
> One big open issue for the TSC to decide is whether we want to keep all Java 
> artifact versions in sync across all modules/projects (i.e. version 1.0.0) 
> for each ONAP release, or if we want to support a mix of independent version 
> numbers and release cycles per project or even per jar file.  For reference, 
> Open-O decided on the former in order to minimize support and maintenance 
> costs.
>  
> Thanks,
> Gary
>  
>  
> From: Closset, Christophe [mailto:cc6...@intl.att.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 6:22 AM
> To: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER ; Andrew Grimberg 
> 
> Cc: Gary Wu ; Coquelin, Sebastien 
> ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] Staging repo in settings.xml
>  
> I’ll set up a call to discuss this further.
>  
> I think we need to have a TSC decision on :
> -  Do we want to freeze artifacts from seed code release 1.0.0 (the 
> stable one) and/or 1.1.0 (the enhanced and catch up code)  or not ?
> o   A mitigated action could be to just go and bless the Docker containers 
> from the stable build that we have – which is what people are trialing 
> against and rename the stable branch to something more meaningful (just keep 
> it for historical purpose and as an easy way for people to see the code they 
> are running their trial on), then for the current master we can probably move 
> away from staging and go to snapshots as suggested below.
> -  Do 

Re: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

[ROSE, DANIEL V]

Can you try with 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT?

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: Ali, Shaheen [mailto:shaheen@centurylink.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:50 PM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron

I got the same ODL version when I did the same command for sdnc-image.

From: ROSE, DANIEL V [dr6...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:54 AM
To: Ali, Shaheen; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron
Appc  may need to build or something? Someone from appc team will have to 
comment but theres no reason it should be running anything but boron

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: Ali, Shaheen [mailto:shaheen@centurylink.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:54 AM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V >; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron

What docker command should I use to make sure I pull the latest 1.1?

docker pull nexus3.onap.org:10001/appc-image:latest is running Beryllium.

Shaheen

From: ROSE, DANIEL V [dr6...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:49 AM
To: Ali, Shaheen; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron
The latest 1.1 image should have it

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Ali, Shaheen
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:47 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

Hello ONAP,

I pulled sdnc-image:latest from the docker repo nexus3.onap.org:10001, and 
found that was running ODL Beryllium.

That surprised me?  How can I pull docker images running running ODL Boron?

Thanks,

Shaheen

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

[Ali, Shaheen]

I got the same ODL version when I did the same command for sdnc-image.

From: ROSE, DANIEL V [dr6...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:54 AM
To: Ali, Shaheen; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron

Appc  may need to build or something? Someone from appc team will have to 
comment but theres no reason it should be running anything but boron

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: Ali, Shaheen [mailto:shaheen@centurylink.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:54 AM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron

What docker command should I use to make sure I pull the latest 1.1?

docker pull nexus3.onap.org:10001/appc-image:latest is running Beryllium.

Shaheen

From: ROSE, DANIEL V [dr6...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:49 AM
To: Ali, Shaheen; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron
The latest 1.1 image should have it

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Ali, Shaheen
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:47 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

Hello ONAP,

I pulled sdnc-image:latest from the docker repo nexus3.onap.org:10001, and 
found that was running ODL Beryllium.

That surprised me?  How can I pull docker images running running ODL Boron?

Thanks,

Shaheen

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

[ROSE, DANIEL V]

Appc  may need to build or something? Someone from appc team will have to 
comment but theres no reason it should be running anything but boron

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: Ali, Shaheen [mailto:shaheen@centurylink.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:54 AM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron

What docker command should I use to make sure I pull the latest 1.1?

docker pull nexus3.onap.org:10001/appc-image:latest is running Beryllium.

Shaheen

From: ROSE, DANIEL V [dr6...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:49 AM
To: Ali, Shaheen; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Looking for an appc image running Boron
The latest 1.1 image should have it

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Ali, Shaheen
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:47 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

Hello ONAP,

I pulled sdnc-image:latest from the docker repo nexus3.onap.org:10001, and 
found that was running ODL Beryllium.

That surprised me?  How can I pull docker images running running ODL Boron?

Thanks,

Shaheen

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

[ROSE, DANIEL V]

The latest 1.1 image should have it

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Ali, Shaheen
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:47 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Looking for an appc image running Boron

Hello ONAP,

I pulled sdnc-image:latest from the docker repo nexus3.onap.org:10001, and 
found that was running ODL Beryllium.

That surprised me?  How can I pull docker images running running ODL Boron?

Thanks,

Shaheen

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of the communication and any attachments.
--- Begin Message ---
I just wanted to confirm that SDN-C has pushed out the major updates that were 
planned for the 1.1 release.

The most significant changes in this release – all related – are:

1. Upgrade to OpenDaylight Boron release
2. Upgrade to Java version 1.8 (required for Boron)
3. Upgrade to Ubuntu 16.04 (required for Java 1.8)


Dan


--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning Wiki 
 for D2 
ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find key 
Release Planning Contact Information.


On 5/1/17, 1:31 PM, "onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org on behalf of ROSE, 
DANIEL V"  
wrote:

*** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***.
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

One clarification: the release 1.1 work is in the master branch if you are 
looking at gerrit!

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308


-Original Message-
From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of ROSE, DANIEL V
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 1:25 PM
To: Ahmad, Munir ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Major updates to ONAP code

*** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***.
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

A few components have pushed out their changes in the release 1.1 branch. 
MSO and SDNC I think are examples of that. Everyone else is on track for may 
5th as far as I know.

Thanks,
Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308


-Original Message-
From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Ahmad, Munir
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 1:00 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Major updates to ONAP code

Hello All,

Earlier last month there were conversations about large code drops to 
various ONAP components to be completed by May 5th 2017.

Is May 5th still the target? if so is this going to be a new release?

Also are there plans to release some documentations on what are those 
changes? If so it would be much appreciated if we can get our hands on the docs 
sooner.

Thanks
Munir


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss=DwICAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=2wwdGZ3YcpSivQ2Kio028A=GPufbk0H5bxhNgILmJTw_xTjRcqUjH-JMOnF2mJSfCM=MGvQnbAAmY7dMRpoKSUAf2FGlX-tWUY7qw-F6Qa-HrU=
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss=DwICAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=2wwdGZ3YcpSivQ2Kio028A=mWyLtWRbVNp4i2Ne6UNl227vbJYlp2MCNMv3liijF-w=B5yDljOi6WxDtOAprsnCDd25u6vCV01AeQAWf-o6uZw=
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss=DwICAg=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=qLcfee4a2vOwYSub0bljcQ=jrCN3HG4W2RuPbSnHOE-gGQnAg1Ekk8cZGg1fhygHc4=41fOmCAWn4WItrIkr1uhc-LCxfT5SDFEL2Qcawg46y4=


--- End Message ---
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

[ROSE, DANIEL V]

Konstantin,

Such a thing would probably be the domain of 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VNF+SDK project but it doesn’t exist today.

Thanks,

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Dunaev
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:29 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

Hello ONAP Community,

we are using “VNF Heat Template Requirements for OpenEcomp” to prepare a Heat 
template, but we don't have running ONAP environment and I can't validate my 
files. We're in the process to install it, but it requires time and resources 
and make take longe time.
Is there any "offline" validation tool, which we can use to verify/validate 
Heat templates before we send them to ONAP environment (running at the customer 
site).
When we sent our current Heat files, the customer responded back with the 
information:

---
Validate file aliagnment - heat validator cannot parse templates.
ECOMP parameters missing -  vf_module_name, vnf_name, and vnf_id

Parameter missing vm_type - any parameter associated with a VM must have a 
vm_type assigned.


---
I could find and correct some problems with naming, but not sure if I see them 
all.
Best regards,
Konstantin
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] is there any heat validator tool?

[Konstantin Dunaev]

Hello ONAP Community,

we are using “VNF Heat Template Requirements for OpenEcomp” to prepare a
Heat template, but we don't have running ONAP environment and I can't
validate my files. We're in the process to install it, but it requires time
and resources and make take longe time.

Is there any "offline" validation tool, which we can use to verify/validate
Heat templates before we send them to ONAP environment (running at the
customer site).
When we sent our current Heat files, the customer responded back with the
information:

---
Validate file aliagnment - heat validator cannot parse templates.
ECOMP parameters missing -  vf_module_name, vnf_name, and vnf_id

Parameter missing vm_type - any parameter associated with a VM must have a
vm_type assigned.


---

I could find and correct some problems with naming, but not sure if I see
them all.

Best regards,
Konstantin
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] VID VM , MariaDb docker does not remain running

[Arun Arora (c)]

Hi Joseph,



Thanks a lot for your suggestion.

For me also, renaming vid_openecomp_epsdk to vid_openecomp did the trick.



However, we had a different view of this that the DB name should be 
“vid_openecomp_epsdk”; so we didn’t make the name change.

We had this impression due to another similar issue being discussed in which 
the DB name was mentioned to be vid_openecomp_epsdk. 
(https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-discuss/2017-May/000911.html)



So, although the issue is fixed, a closure is required on whether the DB name 
should be vid_openecomp_epsdk or vid_openecomp so that the required changes can 
be merged in the master. Do let me know if I can submit the change.



Thanks & Regards,

Arun Arora





From: Josef Reisinger 
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:27:47 PM
To: Arun Arora (c)
Cc: [onap-discuss]
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] VID VM , MariaDb docker does not remain running



Arun,

could your issue be related to the one described 
here:https://wiki.onap.org/questions/5736012/answers/6586792.
 If yes, could you find a solution there? If not would you mind to record your 
issue with the VID database in 
https://wiki.onap.org/questions?
 I am running two instances of ONAP right now on v. Openstack and ith helped in 
the first instance.

I had some issues with exact the same database today in my second instance and 
in tried something different to what is provided as a solution in the above 
mentioned link (to give vidadmin rights to everything), I changed the script in 
/opt/vid_vm_init.sh and changed the DB name from vid_openecomp_epsdk to 
vid_openecomp. And VID worked too.

Btw, if you want to attach to one of the docker container, vid-mariadb needs to 
be running. "docker start vid-mariadb " gives you the database container back 
and you can exec to vid-server or/and vid-mariadb

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Josef Reisinger



From:"Arun Arora (c)" 
To:Elhay Efrat , "Lefevre, Catherine" 
, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 

Cc:"Kapil Gupta \(c\)" 
Date:30.05.2017 17:28
Subject:Re: [onap-discuss] VID VM , MariaDb docker does not remain 
running
Sent by:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org





FYI, some info regarding the VID VM and docker. It might be relevant if there 
is any fix done in the master branch which his not available in the 
release-1.0.0branch.

root@vm1-vid:/opt/config# cat artifacts_version.txt docker_version.txt 
gerrit_branch.txt
1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
1.0-STAGING-latest
release-1.0.0

Thanks,
Arun

From: Arun Arora (c)
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:48 PM
To: Elhay Efrat ; Lefevre, Catherine 
; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Kapil Gupta (c) 
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] VID VM , MariaDb docker does not remain running

HI Catherine, Efrat,

I am not able to find /opt/app/vid/logs/vidor /usr/local/tomcat/logs/ 
directories.
I am assuming these are in the VID VM and not in the docker container. Also, I 
am not able to log in the docker container as it is rendered unavailable even 
when I can see the vid-server container in docker ps list
Pls let me know what else can be done to understand the issue symptoms.

Thanks,
Arun

From: Elhay Efrat [mailto:elhay.efr...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 11:36 PM
To: Lefevre, Catherine >; Arun 
Arora (c) >; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Kapil Gupta (c) >
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] VID VM , MariaDb docker does not remain running

Please add also
Docker logs {mariadb-docker-id}




From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.orgon
 behalf of Lefevre, Catherine
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 5:59:59 PM
To: Arun Arora (c); 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Kapil Gupta (c)
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] VID VM , MariaDb docker does not remain running
Hi Arun,

Could you please provide some logs, traces in order to better understand your 
current MariaDB issue?

Logging/Diagnostic Information
Application logs:
/opt/app/vid/logs/vid

  *   audit.log 

Re: [onap-discuss] How modular is ONAP?

[Viswa KSP]

Thanks Catherine. I'll look forward for more details in this sub-group.

BR,
Viswa

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Lefevre, Catherine 
wrote:

> Good morning Viswa,
>
> ONAP is about to evolve drastically if you look at all the submitted
> proposals that are currently under review by the ONAP TSC.
> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposing+A+Project
>
> An ONAP architecture subcommittee has been recently formed.
> I believe it is a good start to understand not only what already exists
> but also where ONAP will go ...
> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Architecture+Subcommittee
>
> Best regards
> Catherine
>
> From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Viswa KSP
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:13 AM
> To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> Subject: [onap-discuss] How modular is ONAP?
>
> Dear All,
>
> I'm trying to study the architecture of ONAP from scalablity & modularity
> perspective.
> While most of ONAP components are dockerized, still the demo deployment is
> happening via VMs in example demo deployment.
>
> While I understand that the release HEAT file is just a demo and not to be
> taken for typical deployment use-case, I would like to understand how
> modular the contents are.
>
> For example, assume I have my own inventory mgmt system, what effort does
> it take for me to integrate that to ONAP, instead of using AAI? What if I
> wanna plug-in my own SA system etc.
>
> Please point me to some SMEs in ONAP, so that I can continue my
> discussions with them.
>
> BR,
> Viswa
>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Need ONAP webinar slides

[Lefevre, Catherine]

Hi Viswa,

This document has been released under AT IP
So your presentation must contain applicable copyright notices

Best regards
Catherine

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Viswa KSP
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:58 AM
To: ROSE, DANIEL V 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Need ONAP webinar slides

Thanks a lot Daniel. This suffice my requirement.

Could you confirm if I can re-use some portion of this document ?

BR,
Viswa

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:10 PM, ROSE, DANIEL V 
> wrote:
If you are talking about 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Intro+to+ONAP+Webinar
 I don’t seem to have the exact same ppt but here is a very similar one

Thanks,
Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org]
 On Behalf Of ROSE, DANIEL V
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:52 AM
To: Viswa KSP >; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Need ONAP webinar slides

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Can you give more details about who gave this so we can find the info you need?

Thanks,
Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Viswa KSP
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 6:05 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Need ONAP webinar slides

Dear All,

Could someone pls provide me webinar slides???

BR,
Viswa

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Viswa KSP 
> wrote:
Hello,

I would like to use the slides that was presented as part of ONOS Introduction 
webinar.
Could you please provide me the link to download the same?

I assume all the materials of ONAP are open-sourced and can be utilised by 
public. Please let me know if otherwise.

BR,
Viswa


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] How modular is ONAP?

[Viswa KSP]

Dear All,

I'm trying to study the architecture of ONAP from scalablity & modularity
perspective.
While most of ONAP components are dockerized, still the demo deployment is
happening via VMs in example demo deployment.

While I understand that the release HEAT file is just a demo and not to be
taken for typical deployment use-case, I would like to understand how
modular the contents are.

For example, assume I have my own inventory mgmt system, what effort does
it take for me to integrate that to ONAP, instead of using AAI? What if I
wanna plug-in my own SA system etc.

Please point me to some SMEs in ONAP, so that I can continue my discussions
with them.

BR,
Viswa
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Does ONAP support Multi-tenant Openstack deployment?

[Viswa KSP]

Thanks Daniel.

BR,
Viswa

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:19 PM, ROSE, DANIEL V  wrote:

> Sorry I was on my phone so I was recalling from memory. It is called
> cloud_config.json and here is how it is built:
>
>
>
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=mso/mso-config.git;a=
> blob;f=templates/default/mso-po-adapter-config/cloud_config.json;h=
> 41586c169961da6ec08a6da1008863e3c2f0d07d;hb=refs/heads/release-1.0.0
>
>
>
> It is not exposed as a gui right now. I imagine some enhancement to this
> mechanism to allow ease of addition and removal of regions will take place
> but all the functionalities you are requesting is there.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel Rose
>
> ECOMP / ONAP
>
> com.att.ecomp
>
> 732-420-7308
>
>
>
> *From:* Viswa KSP [mailto:kspviswa.git...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 30, 2017 6:04 AM
> *To:* ROSE, DANIEL V 
> *Cc:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] Does ONAP support Multi-tenant Openstack
> deployment?
>
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
>
> Thanks for heads-up. I tried to read more details about *lcp* in MSO here
> ( https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1015834
> 
> ) in architecture page, but I couldn't find any. Could you please point me
> to right resource?  Basically I'm looking for a config page, where I can
> add multiple cloud accounts and name it, such that I choose one during
> instantiation / deployment.
>
>
>
> I would like to try on-board a in-house VNF in ONAP in separate tenant
> space. Is there any working group / team working on this item?
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Viswa
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:07 AM, ROSE, DANIEL V  wrote:
>
> Onap supports multi tenant deployment as well as multisite. That is the
> onap franework can be installed in one tenant or site while the vnfs are
> deployed on another. We also have the ability to have regions and/or
> tenants for vnf deployement. This is defined by something call lcp in mso
> and there is a clouds.yaml that holds all these combinations. The heat
> template we put out for the demo does not however have the full
> capabilities exposed as its meant to be a simple tutorial
>
>
> On May 29, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Viswa KSP  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I would like to know if ONAP supports multi-tenant deployment model. If
> yes, please point me to configuration guide accordingly.
>
>
>
> *More details:*
>
>
>
> If you look at other ETSI compliant NFV-Os like OSM, OpenBaton, there is a
> specific configuration step, where-in we will have to specify a VIM account
> with tenant name, keystone URL. mgmt IP etc. This space will be used by the
> orchestra tor during deployment.
>
>
>
> While instantiating a NSD, we can dynamically at run-time specify which
> VIM account to use.
>
>
>
> While I understand that ONAP currently not multi-vim complaint ( only
> supported with Openstack ), I would like to know if multi-tenant model is
> supported.
>
>
>
> Assume I have 2 tenant spaces ( in 2 different openstack sites - to
> complicate the problem statement further ) and I would like to instantiate
> service 1 in tenant 1 and service 2 in tenant 2, how should I go about in
> realising this requirement?
>
>
>
>  BR,
>
> Viswa
>
> ___
> onap-discuss mailing list
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss=DwICAg=
> LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=2wwdGZ3YcpSivQ2Kio028A=8aOVDebX_cac4i_
> WaD2VI1ZaKYZWTLkLffNt5I5HUgo=MSoC0S256pAGmVajoRWmhow6Wr-
> 4B4vNBOr0W_ffXgE=
>
>
>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Need ONAP webinar slides

[Viswa KSP]

Thanks a lot Daniel. This suffice my requirement.

Could you confirm if I can re-use some portion of this document ?

BR,
Viswa

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:10 PM, ROSE, DANIEL V  wrote:

> If you are talking about https://wiki.onap.org/display/
> DW/Intro+to+ONAP+Webinar I don’t seem to have the exact same ppt but here
> is a very similar one
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel Rose
>
> ECOMP / ONAP
>
> com.att.ecomp
>
> 732-420-7308
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *ROSE, DANIEL V
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:52 AM
> *To:* Viswa KSP ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] Need ONAP webinar slides
>
>
>
> Security Advisory:* This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
>
> Can you give more details about who gave this so we can find the info you
> need?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel Rose
>
> ECOMP / ONAP
>
> com.att.ecomp
>
> 732-420-7308
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org ] *On Behalf Of *Viswa
> KSP
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 30, 2017 6:05 AM
> *To:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] Need ONAP webinar slides
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Could someone pls provide me webinar slides???
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Viswa
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Viswa KSP 
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I would like to use the slides that was presented as part of ONOS
> Introduction webinar.
>
> Could you please provide me the link to download the same?
>
>
>
> I assume all the materials of ONAP are open-sourced and can be utilised by
> public. Please let me know if otherwise.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Viswa
>
>
>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss